Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:33:24.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Architects and the reinforced concrete specialist in Britain 1905–08

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Patricia Cusack
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The reinforced concrete specialist in Britain in the early 1900s was of recent vintage and essentially foreign (French) origin and it was as something of a ‘parvenu’ that he was criticized by British architects from the time that he became properly established. Reinforced concrete then existed as a multitude of patented ‘systems’, or methods of disposing reinforcement, controlled by patentees. Among these, the most prolific was François Hennebique’s French-Belgian system. Hennebique’s success was due not only to the system itself; it depended largely on the specialist commercial-technical organization which he evolved, and extended worldwide, to control both the design and construction of his reinforced concrete works (and which was imitated by others). When Louis Gustave Mouchel became Hennebique’s agent in Britain, from 1897–98, his business organization followed Hennebique’s model with specially trained regional engineers to execute working drawings (after initial designs by an architect or engineer), contractors ‘licensed’ to execute them in return for royalties, and nationwide expansion. By 1905, most reinforced concrete works and all framed buildings in Britain were in Hennebique’s system. It was from about this date that growing criticism of the ‘system specialist’, and of Mouchel personally, was voiced there. Three institutions were initiated, which were intended both to curtail the ‘specialist monopoly’ of reinforced concrete in Britain and to promote the knowledge and use of the material among architects in particular. These were: the RIBA Committee on Reinforced Concrete (1905–07), a journal, Concrete and Constructional Engineering (1906) and the Concrete Institute (1908).

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 29 , 1986 , pp. 183 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

Abbreviations

1 This article is based on a chapter from Cusack, Patricia, ‘Reinforced Concrete in Britain: 1897-1908’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1981), 351-94Google Scholar.

2 By 1904 there were over fifty different systems or methods of reinforcement available. Marsh, Charles F., Reinforced Concrete (London, 1904), 2 Google Scholar.

3 Cusack, Patricia, ‘François Hennebique: The Specialist Organisation and the Success of Ferro-Concrete 1892-1909’, Transactions of the Newcomen Society, 56 (1984-85), 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Mouchel and his agency in Britain are discussed in Cusack, thesis, 291–349.

5 Paper to Royal Sanitary Institute, Cardiff, in C&CE, 3, no. 4 (September 1908), 263-64.

6 Charles F. Marsh to CI, in C&CE, 3, no. 6 (January 1909), 474.

7 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 4.

8 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 13 (28 April 1906), 339; ‘The British Attitude to Ferro-Concrete Construction’, Building Industries, 17 (15 June 1906), 34.

9 Hennebique, F., ‘Note sur les brevets et travaux de la maison Hennebique’, Le Béton Armé (September 1900), 4 Google Scholar; Christophe, Paul, ‘Le béton armé et ses applications’, Le Béton Armé (April 1900), 1 Google Scholar.

10 G. P. Manning, M.ENG., FICE, letter to P. Cusack, 9 October 1980; Manning, G. P., ‘A Hennebique Bridge’, letter to editor, Concrete, 11, no. 10 (October 1977), 20 Google Scholar.

11 Dunn, William, FRIBA, ‘Reinforced Concrete Floors’, letter to editor, JRIBA, 12 (8 April 1905), 373 Google Scholar.

12 Editor’s note, C&CE, 1, no. 4 (September 1906), 275; ‘The Progress of Reinforced Concrete in Great Britain during 1906’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 8, 11.

13 Mouchel, L. G., ‘Discussion on Reinforced Concrete’, JRIBA, 12 (10 December 1904), 85 Google Scholar.

14 ‘Report of the Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 2, no. 3 (July 1907), 176. ‘Editorial Notes: The Late Mr. L. G. Mouchel’, C&CE, 3, no. 3 (July 1908), 180.

15 See: Cusack, thesis, 322, 335, 337.

16 Dunn, op. cit., 373.

17 Surtees, R. T., ‘A Few Experiments and Tests with Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 43 Google Scholar.

18 For example see Scott, A. H. Alban, MSA, discussion at CI, C&CE, 4, no. 1 (March 1909), 54 Google Scholar; Dunn, op. cit., 373.

19 SirTanner, H., ‘Discussion on the Report of the Joint Reinforced Concrete Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (1 June 1907), 503 Google Scholar.

20 SirTanner, H., addressing the Architectural Association, C&CE, 4, no. 6 (November 1909), 377-78Google Scholar.

21 Harrison, C. A., ‘Reinforced Concrete Railway Structures’, C&CE, 2, no. 3 (July 1907), 233 Google Scholar.

22 Cusack, thesis, 196-97.

23 Mouchel, L. G., ‘Monolithic Constructions in Hennebique’s Ferro-Concrete’, JRIBA, 12 (26 November 1904), 57, 59Google Scholar; Gueritte, T. J., ‘Ferro-Concrete Construction’, paper to Edinburgh Architectural Association, Transactions, 5 (1910), 27–28 Google Scholar.

24 ‘Ferro-Concrete in Architecture’, Ferro-Concrete, 2, no. 1 (July 1910), 2; Cusack, thesis, 193.

25 ‘The Use of Expanded Metal in Concrete’, The Builder (15 September 1900), 231.

26 Anderson, Harold H. D., ‘Discussion on Reinforced Concrete’, JRIBA, 12 (10 December 1904), 87–94 Google Scholar; ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 12 (26 November 1904), 62.

27 Mouchel, L. G., The Hennebique Ferro-Concrete System (London, 1905), 174 Google Scholar.

28 Gueritte, T. J., ‘The First Decade of Reinforced Concrete in the UK (1897-1906)’, C&CE, 21 (1926), 92 Google Scholar.

29 ‘Report of the Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 2, no. 3 (July 1907), 176.

30 E. O. Sachs at CI, C&CE, 3, no. 6 (January 1909), 479.

31 Dunn, op. cit., 373; idem, ‘Discussion on the Report of the Joint Reinforced Concrete Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (1 June 1907), 502.

32 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 12 (10 June 1905), 516; SirTanner, H., ‘Prefatory Remarks, Report of the Joint Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, JRIBA, 14 (15 June 1907), 513 Google Scholar.

33 The Building News, 73 (24 September 1897), 436.

34 Fleming, J. Gibson, ‘Review of Lectures on Reinforced Concrete by William Dunn, FRIBA, Assoc. ICE’, JRIBA, 18 (30 June 1911), 588-89Google Scholar.

35 Dunn, William, ‘The Principles of Dome Construction — I’, The Architectural Review, 23 (1908), 73 Google Scholar.

36 Dunn, W., ‘The Bending Stresses in Flat Rectangular Concrete Floors’, JRIBA, 7, 369-73Google Scholar; idem, ‘Construction and Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns’, paper to RIBA, JRIBA, 12, 21-46; ‘New Books: Lectures on Reinforced Concrete delivered at ICE, November 1910’, C&CE, 6, no. 9 (September 1911), 716-17; ‘University of London: Mr. Wm. Dunn’s Lectures’, JRIBA, 17 (22 October 1910), 798.

37 Sachs, op. cit., 479.

38 Marsh, Charles F. and Dunn, William, Manual of Reinforced Concrete (London, 4th edn 1922)Google Scholar.

39 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 15 (9 May 1908), 412; Sachs, op. cit., 479.

40 Dunn, op. cit., 373.

41 Mouchel-Hennebique Ferro-Concrete. List of Works (London, 1920); W.Dunn and R.Watson, letter to A. D. Besant, 4 September 1903; ‘Current Architecture’, The Architectural Review, 18 (July-December 1905), 184-85. On a visit to the CMGLA Society’s buildings at Stjames’s Square (July 1977) little evidence was found of reinforced concrete, which may have been used in some floors and roofing.

42 Dunn, William, ‘Robert Watson, 1865-1916’, JRIBA, 23 (19 February 1916), 142 Google Scholar; Cusack, thesis, 540.

43 Dunn, op. cit., 44.

44 SirTanner, H., Evening Standard, 25 February 1914, cited in: Mouchel-Hennebique Ferro-Concrete (London, 1921), 88 Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 1, no. 6 (January 1907), 403; cf. The Durability of Reinforced Concrete in Buildings, NBS Special Report no. 25 (London, 1956), 3.

45 Tanner, op. cit., 502.

46 William Woodward, C&CE, 6, no. 4 (April 1911), 304.

47 Collcutt, T. E., JRIBA, 14 (22 December 1906), 120 Google Scholar.

48 Hannen, B., ‘Discussion on Reinforced Concrete’, JRIBA, 12 (10 December 1904), 91 Google Scholar; Mouchel-Hennebique Ferro-Concrete. List of Works (London, 1920).

49 Collcutt, T. E., JRIBA, 9 (1901-02) 415 Google Scholar; idem, ‘President’s Address to Students’, JRIBA, 14 (9 February 1907), 216-17; idem, ‘Discussion on the Report of the Joint Reinforced Concrete Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (1 June 1907), 503.

50 Burnet, J. J., ARSA, ‘Discussion on the Report of the Joint Reinforced Concrete Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (1 June 1907), 502 Google Scholar. F. T. Reade questioned the sanity of any engineer using reinforced concrete for girders or columns because of the heterogeneity of concrete and steel, ibid., 503.

51 ‘Report of the Council’, JRIBA, 9 (10 May 1902), 335.

52 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 13 (24 March 1906), 271; ‘Report of the Joint Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, JRIBA, 14 (15 June 1907), 513.

53 Dunn, William, ‘American Committee’s Report on Reinforced Concrete’, JRIBA, 17 (20 November 1909), 87 Google Scholar.

54 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 5, no. 10 (October 1910), 703; ‘The Inst. C. E. Report on Reinforced Concrete’, Ferro-Concrete, 2, no. 5 (November 1910), 136.

55 ‘The Use of Expanded Metal in Concrete’, The Builder, 79 (15 September 1900), 231.

56 Steinberg, H. E., C&CE, 51, no. 1 (January 1956), 31 Google Scholar.

57 Dunn, op. cit., 87. The American Committee on Reinforced Concrete was initiated (1903) by the American Society of Civil Engineers; see also Professor Schule, cited in ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 3, no. 5 (November 1908), 349.

58 ‘The RIBA and Reinforced Concrete’, The Builders’ Journal, 25 (8 May 1907), 225; Twelvetrees, W. Noble, ‘François Hennebique: A Biographical Memoir,’ Ferro-Concrete, 13, no. 5 (November 1921), 140 Google Scholar.

59 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 13 (28 April 1906), 338; Mouchel, op. cit., 47-61.

60 ‘Report of the Joint Committee’, JRIBA, 14(15 June 1907), 514.

61 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 13 (28 April 1906), 338-40.

62 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 14 (8 December 1906), 96-97; ‘Report of thejoint Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (15 June 1907), 513 ff.

63 ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 14 (8 December 1906), 97; Dunn, op. cit., 87; ‘Report of thejoint Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (15 June 1907), 513.

64 Tanner, , ‘Report of thejoint Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (15 June 1907), 514 Google Scholar. W. B. Wilkinson’s pioneering work (1854-55) was acknowledged.

65 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 8 (August 1911), 563; see also: ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 9 (September 1911), 645; compare ‘The RIBA and Reinforced Concrete’, The Builders’ Journal, 25 (29 May 1907), 259.

66 For example, ‘Report of the Joint Committee’, JRIBA, 14 (15 June 1907), 518.

67 Lt-Col Winn, J., ‘The “Advance” in the Concrete Age’, C&CE, 3, no. 1 (March 1908), 6 Google Scholar.

68 MajorPaul, E. M., RE, ‘Discussion on the Report’, JRIBA, 14 (1 June 1907), 500 Google Scholar.

69 Dunn, op. cit., 86; Ferro-Concrete, 1, no. 2 (August 1909), 28; ‘The RIBA and Reinforced Concrete’, The Builders’ Journal, 25 (29 May 1907), 259; Slater, John, ‘Discussion on the Report’, JRIBA, 14 (1 June 1907), 498 Google Scholar.

70 ‘Joint Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, Building Industries, 18 (15 June 1907), 33-34; Editor’s note, C&CE, 3, no. 3 (July 1908), 181.

71 C&CE, 51, no. 1 (January 1956), 1. TheBuildennd The Builders’ Journal had already taken up the subject, for example, ‘The Student’s Column. Concrete-Steel’, The Builder, 85 (4 July 1903), 19; The Builders’ Journal, Concrete and Steel Supplement, 23 (January-June 1906).

72 Who’s Who in Architecture (Westminster, 1914), 193; see also Clarke, Max, JRIBA, 4 (26 August 1897), 444 Google Scholar; C&CE, 51, no. 1 (January 1956), 2.

73 C&CE, 51, no. 1 (January 1956), 3; compare Hamilton, S. B., A Short History of the Structural Fire Protection of Buildings Particularly in England, NBS Special Report no. 27 (London, 1958), 31 Google Scholar; The Builders’ Journal, 7 (February-August 1898), 272.

74 ‘Summary of Proceedings’, Congress Number, JRIBA, 13 (1906), xxxii.

75 Sachs, E. O., Building Industries, 17 (16 May 1906), 17 Google Scholar; ‘Reinforced Concrete at the ICA’, C&CE, 1, no. 4 (September 1906), 291; Transactions, RIBA (London, 1908), 246.

76 Sachs, E.O., discussion at CI, C&CE, 6, no. 7 (July 1911), 498 Google Scholar.

77 Sachs, E.O., cited in ‘Editorial Notes’ C&CE, 3, no. 4 (September 1908), 262 Google Scholar.

78 For example, ‘Characteristics of the Chief Systems of Reinforced Concrete Applied to Buildings in Great Britain’, C&CE, 2, no. 6 (January 1908), 428; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 3-4.

79 Sachs, E. O., ‘Reinforced Concrete at the ICA’, C&CE, 1, no. 4 (September 1906), 293-94Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 1.

80 ‘Memoranda’, C&CE, 2, no. 4 (September 1907), 320. For a brief discussion of the term ‘reinforced concrete’ seeCusack, thesis, 128. ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 2, no. 5 (November 1907), 344.

81 Somerville, D. G. & Co., advertisement, C&CE, 2, no. 6 (January 1908), 510 Google Scholar; Somerville, D. G. & Co., advertisement, C&CE, 3, no. 4 (September 1908), 344 Google Scholar.

82 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 1; ‘Memoranda’, C&CE, 1, no. 3 (July 1906), 214.

83 ‘The Progress of Reinforced Concrete in Great Britain During 1906’, C&CE, 2, no. 1 (March 1907), 11.

84 Serraillier, Lucien, ‘The Reinforced Concrete Specialist’, C&CE, 7 (1912), 94 Google Scholar.

85 ‘Report of the Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 2, no. 3 (July 1907), 176.

86 ‘Editorial Notes: The Late Mr. L. G. Mouchel’, C&CE, 3, no. 3 (July 1908), 180.

87 ‘Report of the Committee on Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 2, no. 3 (July 1907), 175.

88 Hamilton, S. B., A Note on the History of Reinforced Concrete in Buildings, NBS Special Report no. 24 (London, 1956), 15 Google Scholar.

89 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 3, no. 3 (July 1908), 177-78; ‘The Concrete Institute’, The Builders’ Journal, Concrete and Steel Supplement, 27 (20 May 1908), 436; compare ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 15 (9 May 1908), 412.

90 ‘A Concrete Institute’, The Builders’ Journal, Concrete and Steel Supplement, 27 (29 January 1908), 95; ‘The Concrete Institute’, The Builders’ Journal, 27 (26 February 1908), 197; SirTanner, H., C&CE, 6, no. 12 (December 1911), 930 Google Scholar; Sachs, E. O., C&CE, 6, no. 7, 494 Google Scholar.

91 ‘Objects of the Institute’, CI: Transactions and Notes, 1, part 2 (April 1909); C&CE, 3, no. 6 (January 1909), 471.

92 ‘A Concrete Institute’, The Builders’ Journal, Concrete and Steel Supplement, 27 (29 January 1908), 95; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 3, no. 1 (March 1908), 1-2.

93 See Hamilton (1956), 16; Bowley, M., Innovations in Building Materials (London, 1960), 88–89 Google Scholar; Collins, P., Concrete, (London, 1959), 134 Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 12 (December 1911), 890.

94 ‘The Concrete Institute’, The Engineer, 105 (8 May 1908), 490; Sachs, E. O., ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 3, no. 4, 262 Google Scholar.

95 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 3, no. 2 (May 1908), 89-90; ‘Memoranda’, C&CE, 3, no. 4 (September 1908), 341; White, F. A., C&CE, 4, no. 4 (September 1909), 290 Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 7, 483-84; ‘Chronicle’, JRIBA, 16 (8 May 1909), 483.

96 The Earl of Plymouth, cited in ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 3, no. 4, 262-63. Pite, B., and Marsh, C. F., C&CE, 3, no. 6 (January 1909), 474, 482Google Scholar.

97 SirTanner, H., President’s Address to CI, 9 November 1911, The Builders’ Journal, 34 (22 November 1911), 548 Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 7 (July 1911), 483, 485; Tanner, H., C&CE, 6, no. 12, (December 1911), 930-31, 935Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 12, 892-93. The Institution of Structural Engineers was formed in 1922.

98 Sachs, E. O., C&CE, 6, no. 12 (December 1911), 936 Google Scholar; idem, CI: Transactions and Notes, 3 (November 1911), 3.

99 Tanner, H., C&CE, 6, no. 12, 933 Google Scholar.

100 Siemens, Alexander, President, ICE, at CI, C&CE, 6, no. 7, 492 Google Scholar.

101 ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 4, no. 1 (March 1909), 2; see also Sachs, E. O., C&CE, 6, no. 7 (July 1911), 494 Google Scholar; ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 4, no. 2 (May 1909), 78;’The ICE and Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 5, no. 10 (October 1910), 707; Sachs, E. O., C&CE, 6, no. 12 (December 1911), 935 Google Scholar.

102 ‘The ICE and Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 5, no. 10 (October 1910), 711-13, 715.

103 ‘The inst. C. E. Report on Reinforced Concrete — II’, Ferro-Concrete, 2, no. 6 (December 1910), 163; compare ‘The ICE and Reinforced Concrete’, C&CE, 5, no. 10 (October 1910), 711; The Builders’ Journal, Concrete and Steel Supplement, 32 (9 November 1910), 487.

104 ‘University of London: Mr. William Dunn’s Lectures’, JRIBA, 17 (22 October 1910), 798. The first detailed course of instruction on reinforced concrete in Britain was introduced in 1911, at the LCC School of Building, Brixton, ‘Editorial Notes’, C&CE, 6, no. 9 (September 1911), 651.

105 For example, ‘A Correspondent: The Choice of Reinforcement’, C&CE, 5, no. 8 (August 1910), 552. Contrast Collins, op. cit., 81.