Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:38:33.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Scotland Yard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Susan Beattie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of the building of New Scotland Yard (Fig. 31a), the most important public work of architecture of its date in London, is dominated by two men: the architect Richard Norman Shaw and the then Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District, Alfred Richard Pennefather. Both were at the height of their professions at the time of building. In 1887 Shaw, a senior Royal Academician, was already an acknowledged giant among Victorian architects. Of his great country houses, Dawpool, Cheshire, was completed and Bryanston, Dorset, not yet begun. Pennefather’s term of office as Receiver from 1883 to his retirement and knighthood in 1909 spanned the two stages of the Yard’s development, from its conception and the opening of the north block to the completion of the south block in 1907. He is revealed, in the Home Office papers now in the Public Record Office, as a man determined, against official prejudice, delay and opposition, to erect an architectural monument for the police worthy of its purpose - to accommodate a rapidly expanding force - and its position on one of the grandest sites in London. New Scotland Yard is perhaps as much his achievement as it is the culminating masterpiece of Shaw’s life.

Type
Research Article
Information
Architectural History , Volume 15 , 1972 , pp. 68 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

The abbreviation HO 45 refers to the Home Office papers in the Public Record Office

1 HO45/9630/A23696/1

2 HO45/9630/A23696/3

3 The Builder, 7 August 1886, p. 190 Google Scholar

4 HO45/9630/A23696/12, 22 June 1886

5 H045/9765/B841A/1

6 HO 45/9630/A23696/23

7 H045/9765/B841A/2 (copy)

8 The Builder, 21 May 1887, p. 760 Google Scholar

9 H045/9765/B841A/73

10 H045/9765/B841A/34, 19 October 1887 (original letter and notes)

11 H045/9765/B841A/44

12 H045/9765/B841A/48

13 H045/9765/B841A/57

14 H045/9765/B841A/67

15 HO45/9765/B841A/105(copy)

16 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates, 53 & 54 Victoriae 1890, cccxliii, 1282–1283

17 H045/9765/B841A/131 (original letters and notes)

18 Hansard’s Parliamentary Debates, 53 & 54 Victoriae 1890, cccxliii, 1814–1815

19 Sir Reginald Blomfield, Richard Norman Shaw RA (1940), ch.viii

20 HO 45/9996/A47240/89 (with reference back to /29)

21 HO 45/9996/A47240/38

22 PRO Mepol.2/417 (original)

23 HO 45/9996/A47240/89 (with references back to /44 & /51)

24 HO 45/9996/A47240/89 (with reference back to /53)

25 HO 45/9996/A47240/53

26 HO 45/9996/A47240/56

27 HO 45/9996/A47240/59

28 HO 45/9996/A47240/66

29 HO 45/9996/A47240/70

29 HO 45/9996/A47240/70

30 HO 45/9996/A47240/86

31 HO 45/9996/A47240/100

32 HO 45/11472/104840/1

33 HO 45/11472/104840/2

34 H045/11472/104840/9

35 PRO Mepol.2/417