No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
François Cointereaux’s École d’ Architecture Rurale (1790-91) and its Influence in Europe and the Colonies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2016
Extract
This article continues from our previous article on François Cointereaux, published in this journal last year. The aim of this second article is to cast light on the dissemination of the technique of pisé, as perfected by this French agriculturalist and architect, in Europe and its colonies. Although Cointereaux is considered today a minor eighteenth-century architect, the fascicles (cahiers) of his École d’Architecture Rurale were translated shortly after their publication in Paris in 1790–91 into six languages (German, Russian, Danish, English, Finnish, and Italian); these in turn attracted the interest of major architects such as Henry Holland (1745-1806) in England, David Gilly (1748-1808) in Germany, and Nicolai L’vov (1751-1803) in Russia, who founded a school of earth construction in Tiukhili near Moscow based on those of Cointereaux in Paris. Through his publications, Cointereaux generated, at the end of the eighteenth century, an almost universal interest in this vernacular material that was both cheap and abundant. His influence outside France was indeed significant, especially in Europe, where many leading architects used pisé for rural and residential buildings. The sudden interest in this vernacular technique, coinciding with the neo-classical age in revolutionary France and in Europe, might seem surprising. Doubtless this success can largely be explained by a desire to revive rural architecture, as well as by the cheap price of the material and its incombustibility. Although we have no means of assessing the number of pupils who attended Cointereaux’s schools, we do know that there were many visitors, notably foreign ones. In the period 1790–95, they were attracted by the novelty of the material and by his demonstrations of its application; this facilitated the wider dissemination of pisé architecture in Europe, North America and Australasia in 1795–1840.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain 2006
References
Notes
1 Cellauro, Louis and Richaud, Gilbert, ‘Thomas Jefferson and François Cointereaux, Professor of Rural Architectecture in Revolutionary Paris’, Architectural History, 48 (2005), pp. 173–206 Google Scholar.
2 Cointereaux, François, Cours d’architecture rurale pratique ou leçons par lesquelles on fait l’application de la manière anciennement pratiquée par les romains de bâtir en pisé avec la terre seule toutes sortes de maisons & d’édifices… par une société d’artistes (Vienna, 1792-94)Google Scholar. See the notice in Pagan catalogs of the bookseller Hugh Pagan (London, n.d.), pp. 16 (no. 28) and 12.
3 Cointereaux, François, Praktisher Lehrbegriff der Baukunst auf dem Lande …, von einer Kiinstlergesellschaft (Vienna, 1792-94)Google Scholar.
4 Cointereaux, François, Schule der landlichen Baukunst oder Anweisung, feste Hauser von mehreren Stockwerken bloss mit Erde oder anderen gemeinen wohlfeilen Materialen zu bauen (Nuremberg and Altdorf, 1793)Google Scholar; Schule der Landbaukunst, oder Unterricht durch welchen jeder die Kunst erlernen kann, Hauser von etlichen Geschossen aus blossem Erd-oder anderem sehr gemeinen und hbchst wohlfeilen Baustoff selbst dauerhaft zu erbauen (Hildburghausen, 1793).
5 For a complete study of Gilly’s career, see Lammert, Marlies, David Gilly: Ein Baumeister des deutschen Klassizismus (Berlin, 1964)Google Scholar; see also Hermann, Wolfgang, Deutsche Baukunst des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, 1 (Basle, 1932), pp. 5–12 Google Scholar; and Watkin, Davi and Mellinghoff, Tilman, German Architecture and the Classical Ideal, 1740–1840 (London, 1987), pp. 64–65 Google Scholar.
6 Gilly, David, Praktische Abhandlungen aus der Landbaukunst, betreffed den Bau der sogenannten Lehm-oder Wellerivände, wie man dieselben dauerhaft mit wenigen Kosten und einer wahren Holzersparung aufführen könne (Berlin, 1787)Google Scholar.
7 Gilly, David, Beschreibung einer vortheilhaften Bauart mit getrockneten Lehmziegeln (Berlin, 1790)Google Scholar.
8 Gilly, David, Beschreibung der Feuer-abhaltenden Lehmschindeldächer nebst Nachrichten und Erfahrungen iiber die Bauart mit getrockneten Lehmziegeln (Berlin, 1794). Republished in 1796, and in 1801 Google Scholar.
9 Gilly, David, Handbuch der Landbaukunst (Berlin, 1797). Republished in 1811, 1818 and in 1821, pp. 42–73 Google Scholar.
10 Gilly, David «Nachrichten von der Bauart mit gestamfter Erde, oder dem Pisébau», Sammlung niitzlicher Aufsdtze un Nachrichten die Baukunst betreffend, 2 (1797), pp. 106–08 Google Scholar.
11 See Philipp, Klaus Jan (ed.), David Gillys Bibliothek (Reprint des Auktions-kataloges von 1808) (Berlin, 2000), pp. 55 (no. 1622) and 60 (nos 1714, 1718 and 1719)Google Scholar.
12 See the documents quoted in Lammert, , David Gilly p. 194, n. 127 Google Scholar.
13 Cointereaux, François, Die Pisé-Baukunst, in ihrem ganzen Umfang, oder vollständige und Fassliche Beschreibung des Verfahrens, aus blosser gestampfer Erde, ohne weitere Zuthat, Gebäude und Mauerwerk von aller Art wohlfeil, dauerhaft, feuerfest und sicher gegen Einbruch auszufùhren (Leipzig, 1803)Google Scholar.
14 Sachs, Salomon, Anleitung zur Erd-Bau-Kunst (Pisé-Bau), mit Anwendung aufalle Arten von Stadt- und Land-Bauten (Berlin, 1825)Google Scholar.
15 Wimpf, Wilhelm Jacob, Der Pisé-Bau oder vollständige Anweisung (Heilbronn, 1841)Google Scholar.
16 See the catalogue of the buildings in Schick, Wilhelm, Der Pisé-Bau zu Weilburg an der Lahn (Weilburg an der Lahn, 1987), pp. 48–55 Google Scholar.
17 Seidelin, Klaus Henrik, Vejledning til at bygge beqvemme og uforbraendelige Huse afford. Uddraget af Cointeraux Beskrivelse og i adskilligt forandret (Copenhagen, 1796)Google Scholar.
18 Cited in Guillaud, Hubert, ‘Une grande figure du patrimoine régional Rhône-Alpes. François Cointereaux (1740-1830), pionnier de la construction moderne en pisé’, Les carnets de l’architecture de terre, III (Villefontaine, 1997), pp. 31 and 46, note 71Google Scholar.
19 Ehn, Ola, ‘Lerhus i Uppsala’, Arsboken Uppland (1963), pp. 100–01 Google Scholar.
20 Appendix to Sanktpeterburgskie vedomosti, 82, Tuesday, 13 October 1797, p. 4; for L’vov’s career, see Hughes, Lindsey, ‘N. A. L’vov and the Russian Country House’, Russia and the World of the Eighteenth Century, eds, Barlett, Roger P., Cross, Anthony G. and Rasmussen, Karen (Columbus, Ohio, 1988), pp. 289–300 Google Scholar.
21 For more information on the work of Cameron and his Scottish craftsmen, see Cross, Anthony G., ‘Cameron Scottish Workmen’, Scottish Slavonic Review, 10 (1988), pp. 51–74 Google Scholar; and Cross, Anthony G., ‘In Cameron’s Shadow: Adam Menelaws, Stonemason & Architect’, Scottish Slavonic Review, 17 (1991), pp. 7–19 Google Scholar; Shvidkovsky, Dimitri, ‘Architect to Three Emperors. Adam Menelaws in Russia’, Apollo, 135 (1992), pp. 36–41 Google Scholar.
22 For a complete account of L’vov’s earthen buildings, see Makhrov, Alexei, ‘Earth Construction in Russia: A Scottish Connexion’, Architectural History, 40 (1997), pp. 174–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
23 ‘The album of Lvov’, GDM-114-XI (Gatchina Palace Museum).
24 See Makhrov, , ‘Earth Architecture’, p. 170, and n. 18 for citation of documentGoogle Scholar.
25 Makhrov, , ‘Earth Architecture’, p. 179, and n. 22 for sources.Google Scholar
26 ‘Al’bom zemlebitnykh stroenii’, Russian National Library, St Petersburg, Department of manuscripts, Hermitage collection, no. 262.
27 See Makhrov, ‘Earth Architecture’, n. 21, who quotes a letter from Menelaws to Lvov of 28 November 1803, Russian State Historical Archive, Collection 1285, 2, no. 50, p. 50.
28 For the British interest in pisé, see especially Robinson, John Marti, Georgian Model Farms. A Study of Decorative and Model Farm Buildings in the Age of Improvement 1800–1860 (Oxford, 1983)Google Scholar, Chapter ‘Building Materials’, pp. 51–56.
29 Plaw, John, Ferme Ornée; or Rural Improvement (London, 1795), (pi. XXI)Google Scholar. The advertisement reads: ‘In addition to the customary method of making Mud-Walls, as practised in Devonshire and the other countries of England, I beg to notice the new method of building Walls for Cottages, &c. as practised in France; of which an account is given in a little work lately published at Paris, under the title of Maison de Pisé. The method there proposed and an experience recommended, is to construct the Walls of dry earth, well rammed, or beaten together in a mould, like a case; the advantage attending this method is by the author M. Cointeraux spoken of in the highest terms, and as applicable to building of considerable extent, with upper stories, &. That this method is practicable on a small scale, I am well assured by some gentlemen, who have really built with success in this manner. It certainly is cheap, for the mould or case once formed, is easily shifted, and the whole process may be performed by common labourers. It may be proper to observe, the several pieces of the mould must be made to fit properly, and the whole must be well braced or tied together, to resist the percussion of the beating. This method has some advantages over that usually practised; for, being, worked dry, the building is habitable as soon as formed, no danger being likely to arise to the inhabitants from damp walls.’
30 For a complete survey of Holland’s career, see Dorothy Stroud, Henry Holland his Life and Architecture (London, 1966).
31 Communications to the Board of Agriculture; on Subjects Relative to the Husbandry, and Internal Improvement of the Country, 1: 3–4 (1797), pp. 387–403, and pis XLVIII-LIV.
32 Communications to the Board of Agriculture, p. 391.
33 See Pantologia. A new Cyclopedia (London, 1813); Rees, Abraham, The Cyclopaedia or Universal Dictionary of Arts, Sciences and Literature ([1802]-1820); Encyclopaedia Londinensis, xx (1825)Google Scholar; The Complete Farmer, 5th edn (London, 1807).
34 Nicholson, Peter, ‘Pisé’, Architectural and Engineering Dictionary, 11 (London, 1835), pp. 534–37 Google Scholar.
35 The American Farmer, III: 1–5 (1821) [30 March-27 April], pp. 4, 11–13, 20–21, 28–29 and 33–35.
36 Sydney Gazette, xi, no. 1019; xi, no. 1021, unpaginated.
37 The above account is based on the following: Cosgrove, Carol and Dowling, Peter, Pisé Places, Report to the ACT Heritage Council on Behalf of National Trust of Australia (ACT), (Canberra, 2002)Google Scholar; see also Lewis, Miles, Victorian Primitive (Carlton, Victoria, 1977)Google Scholar, particularly the chapter ‘Pisé in Australia’, pp. 51–58; Archer, John, Building a Nation: A History of the Australian House (Sidney, 1987)Google Scholar; Green, A. L., ‘Unfired Earth Walls. The Promotion and use of Sod, Sun-Dried brick, in New South Wales from 1788 to 1960’, Project Report, Master of Built Environment Conservation, University of New South Wales (Sydney, 1989)Google Scholar.
38 For a complete account of Pompallier House, see Ross, Ruth Miriam, A Guide to Pompallier House (Kororareka, 1970)Google Scholar; and Salmond, Jeremy, Old New Zealand Houses, 1800–1940 (Auckland, 1986), pp. 43–44 Google Scholar.
39 Perret, Louis, Catacombes de Rome, architecture, peintures murales, lampes, vases, pierres précieuses gravées, instruments, objets divers, 6 vols (Paris, 1851-55)Google Scholar.
40 Lugar, Robert, The Country Gentleman’s Architect; containing a variety of designs for farm houses and farm yards of different magnitudes, arranged on the most approved principles … with plans and sections (London, 1807), pp. 19–20 Google Scholar.
41 Papworth, John Buonarotti, Rural residences: consisting of a series of designs for cottages … small villas and other … building; With … observations on Landscape Gardening (London, 1818), p. 29 Google Scholar.
42 Loudon, John Claudius, An Encyclopaedia of Cottage, Farm, and Villa Architecture and Furniture; containing numerous designs for dwellings, from the cottage to the villa (London, 1833)Google Scholar.
43 Ibid., pp. 79–81.
44 Communications to the Board of Agriculture, 1 (1797), p. 111.
45 See Robinson, John Martin, ‘Estate buildings of the fifth and sixth Dukes of Bedford at Woburn 1787–1839’, The Architectural Review, CLX: 957 (1976), pp. 276–81 Google Scholar.
46 Ibid., p. 279.
47 Young, Arthur, Annals of Agriculture, xxxix: 227 (1803), pp. 410–18 Google Scholar.
48 Batchelor, Thomas, General View of the Agriculture of the County of Bedford (London, 1808), p. 629 Google Scholar.
49 François Cointereaux, ‘Description du modèle en pierres factices bâti dans la pépinière de M. Gibbs (sic) à Brompton près de Londres’, Nouveau traité sur l’art de bâtir dans les campagnes, et sur les divers moyens applicables aux travaux d’agriculture (Paris, 1815), pp. 7–8: ‘Ce modèle est sur un plan rectangulaire: il a 13 pieds 8 pouces de longueur, 11 pieds de largeur. Sa disposition est simple. L’entrée est à l’occident; une fenêtre, en face de cette entrée, est au soleil levant; ses côtés latéraux au midi et au nord sont pleins, c’est à dire sans porte ni fenêtre pour laisser apercevoir le bel appareil des pierres factices. La hauteur des murs est de 8 pieds 6 pouces, celle de chaque pente au pignon pour l’écoulement des eaux est de 3 pieds 6 pouces, en tout 12 pieds d’élévation … Elle offre à tous les curieux un berceau; ainsi au moyen de 4 colonnes en terre placées en avant de la façade, j’ai converti cette chaumière en un petit temple.’
50 Faulkener, Thomas, History and Antiquities of Kensington (London, 1820), p. 24 Google Scholar.
51 Ibid., p. 24.
52 See the reprint in Bertagnin, Mauro, Il Pisé et la Regola: manualistica settecentesca per l’architettura in terra. Riedizione critica del manuale di Giuseppe del Rosso ‘Dell’economica construzione delle case di terra’ (1793) (Rome, 1992), pp. 29–107 Google Scholar.
53 Rosso, Giuseppe del, Dell’economica costruzione delle case di terra (Florence, 1793)Google Scholar, frontispiece: ‘Opuscolo diretto agl’industriosi possidenti e abitatori del’agro toscano.’
54 Williams-Ellis, Clough, Cottage building in cob, pisé and stabilized earth (Cambridge, 1916). Republished sucessively in 1917, 1919, 1920, 1947 and 1999 Google Scholar.