Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:02:29.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 Archaeological fieldwork and research in Euboea: 2014–2024

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2024

Tamara Saggini*
Affiliation:
University of Lausanne and ESAG Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The last decade has been a fruitful period for the archaeology of Euboea. New and ongoing work includes research projects, survey, rescue, and systematic excavations, led by the Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea of the Hellenic Ministry of Culture (henceforth EAE) and the foreign schools active on the island. In the northern part of the island, protection and restoration of monuments and collections has been the focus of work in various towns (Oreoi, Histiaea, Limni, Aedipsos), and a few sites have been explored (Kerinthos, Cape Artemision). In central Euboea, construction works have allowed for further insights on ancient settlements (Aliveri, Chalkida, Manika, Psachna–Kastella), while systematic excavation projects have explored sites and cultic activities from the Bronze Age to the Archaic time (Amarynthos, Lefkandi–Xeropolis), as well as athletic institutions of the Classical to Roman periods (Eretria). The ancient map of the southern part of Euboea has been enriched (Kapsouri Kaphirea and in the Bouros-Kastri, Kampos, and Katsaronio plains) during multiple survey explorations, leading to further systematic excavations (Gourimadi, Plakari), while extensive research has also now begun in the ancient quarries and the drakospita. New publications on previously investigated sites (Gkisouri, Zarakes, Karystos) and on underwater explorations completes the picture.

Type
Archaeology in Greece 2023–2024
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies and the British School at Athens

Introduction

Euboea, the second largest island of Greece, provides a rich and varied landscape from high mountains to vast plains. This article highlights fieldwork and research published in the last 10 years (Map 4.1), covering the prehistoric period up to the Roman period but not intending to be exhaustive – much of the ongoing work is yet to be published. The goal is to give an overview of the recent explorations for a reader to look up the references and full details provided by the publications. The paper is organized starting from the northern through to the southern part of the island.

Map 4.1. 1. Kerinthos; 2. Cape Artemision; 3. Oreoi; 4. Histiaea; 5. Limni; 6. Aedipsos; 7. Aliveri; 8. Chalcis; 9. Psachna-Kastella; 10. Lefkandi-Xeropolis; 11. Manika; 12. Eretria; 13. Amarynthos; 14. Gourimadi; 15. Plakari; 16. Gkisouri; 17. Kapsouri Kaphirea; 18. Palli Lakka (drakospito); 19. Ilkizès (drakospito); 20. Kapsala (drakospito).

Northern Euboea

In recent years, the EAE has focused on the research of known archaeological sites, the protection and restoration of monuments, and on the upgrading of archaeological museums and ancient collections in different parts of northern Euboea.

Kerinthos

Kerinthos is an ancient settlement built on a hill plateau, located on the northern coast of Euboea. It faces the Aegean Sea and was occupied between the Late Bronze Age and the Hellenistic period. Between 2006 and 2014 an exploration programme was launched under the direction of Angelos Ritsonis, which carried out extensive excavations: the results have recently been published as a monograph dedicated to the site (Ritsonis Reference Ritsonis2018). The settlement is surrounded by a fortification with more than 20 rectangular towers constructed since the Classical period, with a first phase probably dating to the Archaic period (Ritsonis Reference Ritsonis2018: figs 20–22). It is divided into two parts by a central partition wall. On the northern part, spacious houses were built as well as some public buildings. At the highest point of the Western Plateau, a square enclosure with a 30m side has been identified as either an agora or a sanctuary (Ritsonis Reference Ritsonis2018: pls 3A, 12A-B–13; Mazarakis Ainian Reference Mazarakis Ainian2023: 73, figs 5–6 and 75). A large section of water piping built with a vault and hydraulic mortar and dating to the third century was also brought to light (Ritsonis Reference Ritsonis2018: pls 29A-Γ–38). Among the finds, a limestone head of an Archaic statue was discovered, terracotta figurines, and some inscribed stelae. One inscription dating to the mid-fourth century was discovered in 2009 close to the village of Krya Vrysi (west of the site) and attests that the settlement was probably under the control of Chalcis during the Classical period and, possibly, Hellenistic period (Kalliontzis Reference Kalliontzis2019: 307–8). Kerinthos, along with other Euboean coastal sites, played an important role in Aegean maritime trade during the Early Iron Age period (Mazarakis Ainian Reference Mazarakis Ainian2023, with a short synthesis of the explorations and review of the finds). In September 2021, an agreement was signed between the Ministry of Culture and the Municipality of Mantoudi to further explore and protect the site (Simosi Reference Simosi2023: fig. 03). Extensive cleaning and mapping of the site were conducted in order to clarify the limits of the ancient settlement and to prepare new excavations.

The Cape Artemision and the sanctuary of Artemis Proseoas

The majority of the area around Cape Artemision has not been excavated, therefore most of the information from this area comes from surface finds only. At the church of Agios Georgios in Pefki, excavations conducted in 2021 and 2022 in search of the sanctuary of Artemis Proseoas revealed an extensive settlement of the Early Christian period, with ancient architectural blocks embedded into it. In the area, black-glaze pottery was also discovered on the surface. A possible location for the temple of Artemis Proseoas is underneath the church of Agios Georgios, or in its southern vicinity (Schäfer Reference Schäfer, Schäfer and Kalliontzis2020).

Between 2018 and 2022, the EAE conducted some works around Cape Artemision, on the northern coast of Euboea between the modern villages of Pefki and Gouves (Simosi Reference Simosi2023: fig. 04). Cape Artemision is famous as the site of the naval battle that took place here in 480 BC between the Greeks and the Persians. It is also off the coast of Cape Artemision that the famous Early Classical bronze statue of a Zeus or Poseidon (NAM 15161) was discovered in the 1920s, as well as a Hellenistic bronze statue of a young boy riding a horse (NAM 15177): the shipwreck that was transporting these statues has not been fully explored.

Oreoi, Histiaea, and Limni

In Oreoi, the archaeological collection has been enriched and improved over the last 10 years (Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Christodoulou, Stavroulaki and Kostarelli2016/2022: 768–69; Simosi Reference Simosi2023: fig. 5). The marble statue of a bull found in Oreoi was given a new protective roof that makes it now fully visible on all sides. In Kamaria, south of Histiaea, the neoclassical building ‘Vlachothanassis’, built in 1900 and now listed as cultural heritage by the Hellenic Ministry of Culture, has been renovated and will allow the exhibition of finds from the area (Kalamara Reference Kalamara2020). The archaeological collection in Limni was also renewed. It hosts finds dating from the Bronze Age to the Early Christian period that come from a wider area. Recent construction works for the installation of wastewater pipes in Oreoi and Histiaea have brought to light ancient remains, which will be detailed in future reports. These will greatly increase the number of discoveries made in the region, from which to date there is only a small Hellenistic three-room structure discovered in 2005, northeast to the modern city of Oreoi. Found within this building, and contained inside an olpe (high-handled winejug), was a hoard of 155 silver coins, most of them tetraobols minted in the ancient polis of Histiaea (ID5477; Ritsonis Reference Ritsonis, Schäfer and Kalliontzis2020).

Aedipsos

In January 2022 a new building programme was approved for the conversion of the old hydrotherapy centre ‘Agioi Anargyroi’ of Loutra Aedipsos into a larger museum for northern Euboea (Simosi Reference Simosi2023). The rescue excavations connected to this project were conducted by the EAE and led to the discovery of new Roman buildings and water pipes, as well as funerary pithamphorae (Archaic type of amphora), among which was one enchytrismos (pot-burial) (ID18519; Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Kosma, Christodoulou and Ritsonis2014/2020: 1199–200).

Central Euboea

Aliveri

The coastal town of Aliveri is located 52km southeast of Chalcis, the island’s capital. Construction of power stations in the early 1950s and in the 2010s exposed ancient remains here, and this has led to several rescue excavations carried out in the area by archaeologists under the supervision of the EAE (ID18496, ID18497, ID18498). Two preliminary studies have recently been published of the site’s Classical–Hellenistic necropolis (most of the burials date to the fourth century) and provide an overview of the material (Katsarelia Reference Katsarelia2018; Reference Katsarelia2020). The 37 adults and children inhumations were placed mostly in pits, tiles, or stone sarcophagi together with pottery and metal finds, as well as figurines and astragals (knucklebones used as dice or a game) for children; one pyre was also discovered. Among the discovered stelae, three are published (Katsarelia Reference Katsarelia2020). Two of them bear inscribed names (Phanokrite and Hippokydes) that are well established in the onomastic landscape of central Euboea, and one the name of a presumed foreigner (Bryas).

Chalcis

One of the biggest achievements of the last decade for archaeological outreach in Euboea has been the opening in 2016 of a new museum in Chalcis; called Arethousa and housed within a renovated old industrial building, this museum hosts exhibits from archaeological sites across the whole island (Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Christodoulou, Stavroulaki and Kostarelli2016/2022: 780–82; Simosi Reference Simosi2022).

The EAE was also kept busy with the start of construction works for the new General Hospital of Chalcis in 2012 (ID18514). Located in the area north of the mountain range of Vathrovouni and to the east of the city, the rescue excavations led to the discovery of segments of the ancient city wall (Kosma and Chairetakis Reference Kosma and Chairetakis2017). The wall had already been partially visible before the excavations even started, as it had been identified in the 1980s during surface surveys. It continues outside the limits of the hospital construction site, both to the north and south. Two chronological phases are attested. The first is to be placed in the fifth century BC, contemporary with the cemetery located right outside the walls. It is possible that this segment was constructed under the supervision of the Athenians who had variously occupied the area during this period, but this hypothesis remains uncertain, as knowledge (from literary sources) of the ancient town of Chalcis in fifth century BC is quite limited. The second construction phase can be placed between the second half of the fourth century BC and the beginning of the second quarter of the third century BC. Four square towers with sides of length 7m have been preserved, as well as evidence showing that the wall was rebuilt and widened. A possible foundation deposit has also been excavated at the level of the wall foundations (Kosma and Chairetakis Reference Kosma and Chairetakis2017: 361). Traces of destruction are visible on the wall, as well as in some rescue excavations in the city; they might be related to the Chremonidean War and the capture of the city by Antigonus II Gonatas (268/7–261 BC) (Chairetakis Reference Chairetakis2020).

Psachna–Kastella

North of Chalcis, rescue excavations conducted since 2015 during construction works for sewage systems in the region of Psachna and Kastella brought to light many ancient remains dating between the Classical period and Turkish occupation (Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Christodoulou, Klapaki and Kostarelli2015/2019: 467; Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Christodoulou, Stavroulaki and Kostarelli2016/2022: 761–68). Walls and capitals were discovered close to the central church of the Annunciation of the Virgin Mary, of which one is still in the church’s wall. Two tombs with grave offerings of the Classical period were discovered in Kastella, among which were a black-glaze lekythos (oil/perfume jug), one oinochoe (wine jug), and one lekanis (shallow bowl) (Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Christodoulou, Stavroulaki and Kostarelli2016/2022: 761, fig. 64). A house probably dating to the Hellenistic period was discovered, as well as clay pipes in several places, and a cistern 3.15m long and dating to the Late Roman period.

Manika

South of Chalcis, at Manika, the site of a known large settlement of the Bronze Age, new discoveries were made in 2015 during the rescue excavation of the EAE (Christodoulou Reference Christodoulou2015: 459–63, figs 24–26). Two parallel 10m long walls of a building dating to the Early Helladic II were unearthed, between which at least three floor levels made of mud and gravel were preserved. In addition, discoveries were made of pottery, human bones, animal bones in a hearth, loom weights, spindle whorls, and obsidian blades.

Lefkandi–Xeropolis

The most recent phase of the Lefkandi–Xeropolis project led by Irene Lemos (Oxford) has seen the successful completion of various study seasons, undertaken in preparation for publications that are bringing many important results from the site to light (ID5572; Morgan Reference Morgan2014: 27–28; Reference Morgan2015: 38–39; Lemos Reference Lemos2015/2019; Reference Lemos2019). In Region I, eight phases dating between the Late Helladic IIIC Middle to the Early Protogeometric have been assigned to Building M (previously called the ‘megaron’), while two small buildings represent the Sub-Geometric and Late Geometric phases. In Region II, an important result of the study seasons has been the decipherment of the stratigraphical sequences. This region is called the ‘Ritual Zone’ because of the finds and structures brought to light. Pottery includes remarkably large craters and cooking devices. Figurines were the main finds unearthed, together with bone fragments found within structures and characterized as non-domestic, industrial, or funerary. The area yielded a huge quantity of bone fragments, of which 2,466 were studied, showing evidence for consumption, and representing species that have been found in other areas of the site as well: sheep, pig, or cattle, and more rarely deer, dog, and lion. Cataloguing of the small finds and pottery continued, as well as projects on the clay analysis of various potteries, undertaken in collaboration with Ian Whitbread (Leicester) and the ESAG. Recent publications include the pottery of Lefkandi phases I and IV–VI (Dickinson Reference Dickinson2020; French and Dickinson Reference French and Dickinson2023). Coastline and marine fauna were also studied as part of the project’s explorations. Several cores were drilled at Lefkandi, Eretria, and Aliveri aiming to investigate the evolution of the central Euboean coastline. The large marine fauna collection studied by Tatiana Theodoropoulou (Côte d’Azur) reveals an intensive and coherent exploitation of the shores.

In parallel, rescue excavations conducted by the EAE at Lefkandi led to the discovery of a large number of finds. On the road along the seashore, pottery dated between 1050 and 900 BC came to light, among which was a complete Protogeometric cup (Lemos Reference Lemos2015/2019: 463–67, figs 27–34). An unlooted Protogeometric pit grave came to light, too, which had inside it a black-glaze spheric aryballos, two kalathoi, a bird shaped vase, and an oinochoe. Close by, two tombs with tiled covers dating to the Late Roman period were discovered in a hitherto-archaeologically-unknown area of Lefkandi (Karatzas Reference Karatzas2019). These tombs are part of a possible larger necropolis, which could presuppose the existence of a yet unknown settlement.

Eretria and Amarynthos

Over recent years, many rescue excavations have been conducted in Eretria by the EAE, and are still ongoing, much of this work a result of the construction of the new water network. The valuable new data that will come to light will surely improve our understanding of the ancient town and its layout. Recent discoveries include a complex of at least four Classical–Hellenistic buildings. These buildings, located southeast of the ancient city, had up to four construction phases and 17 rooms in total; they were excavated on a surface of 27 × 28m and aligned with a nearby road. The houses were built in a similar technique to that of the houses in the West Quarter (ID18505; Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Kosma, Christodoulou and Ritsonis2014/2020: 1177–86). A new round bath installation was also located northeast of the ancient agora, discovered with small terracotta foot bathtubs for 20 people arranged circularly around a central open space and decorated by a white and blue pebble mosaic rosette: this construction dates between the end of the fifth and the beginning of the fourth century BC (Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Kosma, Christodoulou and Ritsonis2014/2020: 1181–83, fig. 44). Further north and immediately east to the temple of Apollo, there is another pebble mosaic floor dating to the fourth century, one that decorates the square room of an andron (men’s quarters; side of 3.50m), and which was unearthed in spring 2024 during water pipeline works by the EAE. It represents two satyrs dancing and one playing the double flute (https://www.culture.gov.gr/el/Information/SitePages/view.aspx?nID=5051&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1eA3MTF5FduUeln3FSqYvQ8OD0tdES5ySUh-W_Lqv3lh9nB-LEkEqNlYs_aem_tXADst3TaT-M3AzkD0smYA).

Recent systematic excavations in Eretria by the ESAG have focused in particular on the athletic institutions. Between 2015 and 2017, new explorations were conducted at the north gymnasium (Fig. 4.1; ID5445, ID6175, ID6789; Ackermann et al. Reference Ackermann, Tettamanti, Pop and Reber2018; Ackermann and Reber Reference Ackermann and Reber2019: with plan 173 pl. I). The gymnasium is divided into two peristyle courtyards: a large courtyard to the west, whose construction dates back to 330/20 BC, and a smaller courtyard to the east, built during the second quarter of the third century BC. The arms of a monumental marble statue probably identified as L. Mummius Achaicus is among the important findings that come from this area (Ackermann and Pop Reference Ackermann and Pop2020). A rather intriguing discovery was made of a well filled with different materials, including human bones (among which there were remains of around 100 foetuses and infants, some children and several adults) as well as the remains of numerous animals of various species, and bronze artefacts, including three fragments of a statue of a young man (Ackermann and Liston Reference Ackermann and Liston2020) and a bronze statuette of Artemis Ephesia (Ackermann Reference Ackermann2022). The best explanation for the statuette’s presence alongside the bones of infants (who had died in the perinatal period) is that it was a propitiatory offering made by midwives, hoping to place their activities under the auspices of Artemis, who is invoked here as a protective divinity for newborns, dead or alive.

Fig. 4.1. Eretria: plan of the gymnasium. © ESAG.

As in other Greek cities, running tracks (dromoi) were situated close to the gymnasium, thus forming an athletic complex. In 2019, two running tracks were identified through geomagnetic survey and trial trenching, one track of which was to the west along with a probable xystus (portico) and one to the south of the gymnasium (ID12993; Ackermann and André Reference Ackermann and André2020).

In the southeast of the ancient town, a palaestra (wrestling ground) known since the beginning of the twentieth century was also explored during the ESAG excavation campaign in 2018 (ID9079; Luisoni and Ackermann Reference Luisoni and Ackermann2019). Its construction dates back to the second half of the fifth century BC and contains a cult space dedicated to Eileithyia dating from the third century BC.

Another project conducted on the Eretrian acropolis in 2014, under the direction of Sandrine Huber (Lille), aimed to continue the exploration of the sanctuary of Athena, and to better understand the defence system (ID5060; Huber and Fachard Reference Huber and Fachard2015). Rich material from the seventh to the beginning of the fifth century and also from the beginning of the third century was recovered, among which many terracotta figurines and some relief architectural terracotta elements were found (Huber and Maillard Reference Huber and Maillard2015). The material from the excavation is currently under study for publication, but these discoveries confirm the importance of the sanctuary dedicated to Athena on the acropolis. They also attest to a gap in use at the beginning of the fifth century (perhaps due to the Persian wars) and have brought to light a new segment of the sixth-century fortification or terracing wall.

The Greek–Swiss systematic excavations of the Artemision in Amarynthos, located 10.8km east of Eretria, have been underway for more than 10 years. The project was instigated by Denis Knoepfler and is currently directed by Sylvian Fachard (ESAG) and Aggeliki Simosi (EAE); before 2021 the project was directed by Karl Reber (ESAG) and Amalia Karapaschalidou (EAE). Many buildings have come to light, mainly in the eastern half of the site (ID5062, ID5446, ID6176, ID6790, ID12997, ID12998, ID18029, ID18254, ID18579, ID18587; Figs 4.2 and 4.3; Reber et al. Reference Reber, Ackermann, Tettamanti, Pop, Knoepfler, Karapaschalidou, Krapft and Theurillat2018; Verdan et al. Reference Verdan, Theurillat, Krapf, Greger and Reber2020b; Fachard et al. Reference Fachard, Simosi, Krapf, Saggini, Kyriazi, André, Chezeaux, Greger, Verdan and Theurillat2023; Reference Fachard, Simosi, Krapf, Saggini, Kyriazi, André, Chezeaux, Verdan and Theurillat2024; https://www.esag.swiss/amarynthos/). The identification of the sanctuary was secured in 2017 with the discovery of inscriptions stating the name of Artemis, while her temple was identified in 2020. The earliest remains from the site date back to the twelfth century BC, and are located in the eastern part of the sanctuary and in the temple sector; the last period of use is probably to place in the third century AD. On our current understanding, the first temple was built at the end of the eighth century BC (Building 14), over the top of an older building. The Archaic period (seventh–sixth century) witnessed the monumentalization of the sanctuary with the construction of a portico on the northern edge (Building 5) and a large double entrance gate to the east (Building 3). This was replaced in the second half of the fourth century BC by an important pi-shaped portico (Building 1). Small oikoi were erected along the northern and the southern edges of the shrine (Buildings 7–8, 12–13). A Roman well (Building 10), built in the first century BC, was the latest antique structure that survived until the site’s abandonment in the third century AD. One of the most impressive discoveries is of an important Late Archaic (525–500 BC) offering deposit of ca. 700 objects, placed within the temple’s foundations: vases, figurines, jewellery, fabrics, amulets, and weaponry were all positioned in a careful way just before the construction of a new temple around 500 BC. The Geometric and Archaic phases of the temple are currently under study for publication. Since 2021 the excavation has been supplemented by a survey project (Eretria-Amarynthos Survey Project – EASP) exploring the plain between Eretria and Amarynthos, directed by Sylvian Fachard (ESAG) and Aggeliki Simosi (EAE) in collaboration with Chloé Chezeaux. The project aims to investigate the relationship between the sanctuary and the surrounding demes, the communication network and the rural economy of the region (ID18257, ID18580; Fachard et al. Reference Fachard, Simosi, Krapf, Saggini, Kyriazi, André, Chezeaux, Greger, Verdan and Theurillat2023; Reference Fachard, Simosi, Krapf, Saggini, Kyriazi, André, Chezeaux, Verdan and Theurillat2024).

Fig. 4.2. Amarynthos: plan of the Artemision. © ESAG.

Fig. 4.3. Amarynthos: drone view of the Artemision. © ESAG.

Rescue excavations have been conducted by the EAE in several places. In Gymnou, ancient walls, tombs, and pits dating to the Classical/Hellenistic period have been discovered, as well as pottery from the Middle and Late Helladic periods (Kalamara et al. Reference Kalamara, Katsali, Christodoulou, Klapaki and Kostarelli2015/2019: 468–70). In Koukaki Ano Vathia, a large destruction layer with material dating between the Hellenistic and Roman period was brought to light during construction works.

The last decade has been rather productive in terms of publications, and only a selection is presented here.

Excavated between 2009 and 2014, the ‘Sandoz’ plot yielded remains of houses dated to the Classical and Hellenistic periods (ID5061; Ackermann, Tettamanti and Zurbriggen Reference Ackermann, Tettamanti and Zurbriggen2015) and a Roman bath installation in use between the second and the third century AD. These structures were fully published recently in the Eretria series (no XXV, Theurillat et al. Reference Theurillat, Ackermann, Duret and Zurbriggen2020). From the same site, these structures were preceded by a tholos (circular building) bath dated to the first century BC, discovered in the northern limit of the excavation at the end of the last campaign (2014). As a result of its rather recent discovery, the remains of this structure have not yet been fully explored.

The Eretria series has also seen in recent years the publication of volume XXIII by Kristine Gex with the contributions of various authors (Gex Reference Gex2019) on excavations from the ‘Bouratza’ plot northeast of the ancient agora; volume XXIV by Guy Ackermann on the Hellenistic pottery and its chronology (Ackermann Reference Ackermann2020); and volume XXVI by Tamara Saggini on the pottery from contexts dating to the sixth and the early fifth century (Saggini Reference Saggini2024). Additionally, a synopsis of the recent work and research on Eretria and Amarynthos has been published (Fachard Reference Fachard2022).

Since 2014, a diachronic archaeometric project has been underway, under the direction of Sylvie Müller Celka (ESAG) and Evangelia Kiriatzi (BSA), focusing on pottery production and supply in Eretria from the Early Bronze Age to the Roman period. The project has used a range of samples from Lefkandi and Chalcis. The final results are currently in preparation for publication, but preliminary reports are already available (Charalambidou et al. Reference Charalambidou, Kiriatzi, Müller, Müller Celka, Verdan, Huber, Gex, Ackermann, Palaczyk and Maillard2018). The main source of clay is the Lelantine plain. One of the most striking results for Eretria is that two fabrics are used throughout the Bronze Age until the Hellenistic period: one for the fine ware and one for the coarse.

Other categories of material have received attention, such as a gold hoard discovered in Eretria and dated to the eighth century BC (Verdan and Heymans Reference Verdan and Heymans2020), as well as melting plates. The hoard comprises 398 objects, among which there were ingots, nuggets, or wires connected to the manufacture of ornamental objects; these finds weighed 513g in total and were placed inside a complete skyphos (drinking cup). Used as a form of money for exchange and payment, the origin of the materials is probably from the Thermaic gulf (Heymans and Verdan Reference Heymans and Verdan2023).

Archaic Eretria and Chalcis have been the subject of a recent article in the prestigious Oxford History of the Archaic Greek World published in 2024 (Fachard and Verdan Reference Fachard and Verdan2024). The authors reviewed all available historical and archaeological evidence to produce a long-awaited critical synopsis on two of the most important Euboean cities in Antiquity, including perspectives drawn from geology to political institutions, material culture, settlement patterns, and tribal organization.

Geoarchaeology

Recent research on the palaeoenvironment of central Euboea has been conducted as a collaboration between the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), the BSA, the ESAG, Harokopio University of Athens, and the EAE, in a project attempting to reconstruct the evolution of the Holocene coastal landscape in the vicinity of major archaeological sites and to interpret their history of human occupation (ID4886; Ghilardi et al. Reference Ghilardi, Müller Celka, Theurillat, Fachard and Vacchi2016; Reference Ghilardi, Vacchi, Curras, Müller Celka, Theurillat, Lemos and Pavlopoulos2018).

Within the scope of this project, 26 boreholes in total have been drilled in the coastal plains of Lefkani, Eretria, Amarynthos, and the Lilas delta: samples have permitted the identification of molluscs and ostracods, granulometric analyses of the sediments, and the sequencing of 71 radiocarbon dates to provide a robust chronostratigraphic framework. Additionally, a pollen sequence from Amarynthos has been studied to reconstruct the area’s vegetation history. Results show that the maximum extension of the sea during the Holocene is synchronously dated at all sites to around 4500–4000 BC. At the beginning of the third millennium BC, the first phase of deltaic progradation is recorded, and a second at the beginning of the first millennium BC continuing into modern times. The first phase was caused by natural phenomena combined with the anthropogenic factors caused by the human occupation of the land; the second phase can probably be explained by anthropogenic factors alone (for example, on water management strategies undertaken in Eretria between the Late Bronze Age and the Archaic period; see Verdan et al. Reference Verdan, Theurillat, Fachard and Ghilardi2020a). Another project further explored the fluvial history of the Lilas river from the Mycenaean to the Ottoman period (Ghilardi et al. Reference Ghilardi, Kinnaird, Kouli, Bicket, Crest, Demory, Delanghe, Fachard and Sanderson2022). A ca. 2.5m thick stratigraphic profile was investigated in terms of granulometry and magnetic parameters, in combination with the OSL (optically stimulated luminescence) sediment chronology. The analysis highlights regional reduction in forest vegetation, a phenomenon that was due to a pronounced use of the land for cereal cultivation that resulted in the intensification of floods.

Southern Euboea: the Karystia

Survey explorations

Southern Euboea has a long history of archaeological surveys (Figs 4.4 and 4.5) and several scholars have paved the way to these explorations, such as H. Sackett, D. Theocharis, and A. Sampson (Theocharis Reference Theocharis1959; Sackett et al. Reference Sackett, Hankey, Howell, Jacobson and Popham1966; Sampson Reference Sampson1981).

Fig. 4.4. Southern Euboea: map showing all the survey projects. © R. M. Seifried.

Fig. 4.5. Southern Euboea: map showing the Paximadi and the Bouros-Kastri peninsulae, and major sites. © R.M. Seifried.

The Bouros-Kastri Peninsula, located east of the bay of Karystos, is the region of focus for an older fieldwork project called the Southern Euboea Exploration Project (SEEP) that took place in 1989, 1990, and 1993, but which has been the subject of an extensive publication in 2018 (Wickens et al. Reference Wickens, Rotroff, Cullen, Talalay, Perlès and Mccoy2018). In all, 58 sites were identified, dating from the Neolithic to the Roman period. No material has been recorded from the Early Bronze Age IIB until 500 BC. A few sites, such as the sanctuary at Elliniko, in the Platanistos valley, and Geraistos, situated southeast of Platanistos, are dated to the end of the sixth century BC. The Classical and Early Hellenistic periods represent the first substantial occupation phases on the peninsula since the Early Bronze Age. Between the third century BC until the fourth century AD, only seven sites or findspots are recorded.

The Kampos plain extends to 260ha and is located north of the Paximadi Peninsula and west of the bay of Karystos (Tankosić and Chidiroglou Reference Tankosić and Chidiroglou2010). Fieldwork was conducted here between 2006 and 2008 in the frame of the SEEP and recorded 36 previously unknown archaeological findspots ranging from the end of the Neolithic to the Late Byzantine. The goal was to fill gaps in our knowledge of the ancient Karystia and supplement the data already gathered, as well as to help map and protect sites in an area under rapid development. The numerous new findspots fulfilled these goals and showed that the plain was well occupied both in prehistoric and historic periods.

Between 2012 and 2016 another survey project, the Norwegian Archaeological Survey (NASK), was conducted in the Katsaronio plain, located 5km northwest of Karystos, between the villages of Marmari and Katsaroni and led by the Norwegian Institute at Athens (Tankosić et al. Reference Tankosić, Laftsidis, Psoma, Seifried and Garyfalopoulos2021a: 4, fig. 1). The goals were to conduct a systematic archaeological project in a region hitherto unexplored, look for diachronic occupied areas, and record evidence of the earliest human presence in the Karystia. An area of 20km2 was surveyed, yielding 99 new findspots ranging from the Final Neolithic to the Early Modern; there was a hiatus in the dating of the sites between the end of the Early Bronze Age and the Geometric periods. Evidence showed communities connected micro-regionally as well as wider in the Aegean, diachronic occupation in the Katsaroni plain and population fluctuations depending on available natural resources. Targeted excavations will be investigating these results further in the near future.

The Gourimadi Archaeological Project

The Gourimadi Archaeological Project started in 2018 under the aegis of the Norwegian Institute at Athens; the project is still ongoing (ID8512, ID17976, ID17977, ID18177, ID18589; Tankosić et al. Reference Tankosić, Laftsidis, Psoma, Seifried and Garyfalopoulos2021a: 24–26; Reference Tankosić, Mavridis, Zafeiriadis and Psoma2021b). The project is co-directed by Žarko Tankosić, Fanis Mavridis, and Paschalis Zafeiriadis. The site of Gourimadi is located on a hilltop in the southeastern part of the Katsaronio plain, west from Karystos, and offers an excellent visibility of the Cyclades and Attica. The excavation confirmed the existence of an important prehistoric site previously identified during the NASK survey. The settlement of Gourimadi was occupied from the Late Neolithic until the Early Bronze Age. Preliminary reports describe architectural remains consisting of mud-brick structures, stone-built curved and straight walls. Finds from the site comprise arrowheads, Melian obsidian, metallurgical remains (such as slags and a copper axe), ground-stone tools, terracotta anthropomorphic figurines, spindle whorls, faunal remains, and pottery with various types of decoration, including relief, incised, and plastic decoration, pattern-burnished, and white-on-dark wares.

The Plakari Archaeological Project

The multidisciplinary Plakari Archaeological Project was conducted between 2010 and 2015 under the co-direction of the Vrije University of Amsterdam (VU), represented in Greece by the NIA and the EAE. The project was directed by Jan Paul Crielaard (VU) and Maria Kosma (EAE) until her sudden death in 2015 (see In memoriam in Crielaard et al. Reference Crielaard, Charalambidou, Chidiroglou, Groot, Kluiving, Songu and Troelstra2017: 69), after which Kostas Boukaras took over (Crielaard et al. Reference Crielaard, Charalambidou, Chidiroglou, Groot, Kluiving, Songu and Troelstra2017 with earlier references; Crielaard Reference Crielaard2017; Reference Crielaard2020). The project was supplemented by a geoarchaeological exploration of the region (for a preliminary report, see Crielaard et al. Reference Crielaard, Charalambidou, Chidiroglou, Groot, Kluiving, Songu and Troelstra2017: 84–86; Crielaard Reference Crielaard2017: 128–30).

Plakari is a settlement located on the coast, 2.5km west of modern Karystos and on a low hill, of which the summit probably served as an acropolis (Fig. 4.6; Chidiroglou Reference Chidiroglou2003–2004; Crielaard Reference Crielaard2017: 127, note 3). Excavations conducted between 2011 and 2013 focused on the Early Iron Age to Late Classical site, including the investigation of the site’s sanctuary. The explorations conducted between 2014 and 2015 were centred on the Final Neolithic area of the site (Fig. 4.7; Crielaard et al. Reference Crielaard, Charalambidou, Chidiroglou, Groot, Kluiving, Songu and Troelstra2017: 70–84, plan fig. 1). The Final Neolithic remains (ca. 4300–3300 BC) brought to light on the northeastern flank of the hill were identified as possible domestic structures. Pottery such as incised ware, burnished ware, and cheese pots was discovered (Crielaard et al. Reference Crielaard, Charalambidou, Chidiroglou, Groot, Kluiving, Songu and Troelstra2017: fig. 10 for a sample) together with flint, pebble tools, and obsidian. An Early Iron Age wall was built on the earlier remains, corresponding to what is found in the western part of the hill.

Fig. 4.6. Plakari: aerial view of the site. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photograph by J.P. Crielaard and D. Batsis).

Fig. 4.7. Plakari: plan of the site on the hill top. © J.P. Crielaard.

On the western side of the hilltop, investigations were conducted on two human-made terraces sheltering a sanctuary whose cult could perhaps be associated with Artemis and Apollo (Crielaard Reference Crielaard2017: 134–35). The earliest structures date back to the Early Iron Age. Among the structures of the highest terrace, Terrace 2, a semi-circular stone altar was in use during the Archaic period. The abundant pottery found here is suggestive of communal feasting that could have taken place until the fourth century BC (Chidiroglou Reference Chidiroglou2014; Charalambidou Reference Charalambidou2017), with a peak in the Middle Geometric II and Late Geometric periods; zooarchaeological findings from this area support this interpretation (Crielaard et al. Reference Crielaard, Charalambidou, Chidiroglou, Groot, Kluiving, Songu and Troelstra2017: 88). Fibulae, pins, rings, diadems, knives, an iron obelos (skewer), and a weighing beam were all discovered here (Crielaard Reference Crielaard2017: 135–37). In the late fifth or early fourth century BC, the terrace was restructured and Building A – which served as pantry and storage for cult material – was constructed.

On the lower terrace (Terrace 1), a first levelling phase was dated to the Late Archaic/Early Classical periods. During the Classical period, the lower terrace was reachable thanks to a ramp, which led with a curving path to a large entrance. In the Late Classical period, Building B, a possible wine storage, was constructed. The sanctuary fell out of use at the end of the fourth century.

Gkisouri at Nea Styra

In 2014 the wider area of Nea Styra was declared an archaeological site. On the low hill at a short distance from the sea and to the east of the modern settlement Nea Styra, the site of Gkisouri is located (Fig. 4.8). It has been known since the end of the nineteenth century when a discovery was made here of three marble Cycladic sculptures. Since then, surface investigations in the wider area of Nea Styra have been conducted and have located architectural remains, abundant pottery, and obsidian. These discoveries have allowed for the identification of a coastal settlement of the Early Bronze Age at Lefka. The excavations conducted in 2009 and 2013 brought to light three graves from the Early Bronze Age period, recently published more extensively (Figs 4.9a and 4.9b; Kosma Reference Kosma2020). The coastal settlement of Nea Styra, to which the cemetery of the Early Helladic II period belongs, is part of the chain of sites that are distributed along the western coastline of Euboea, forming pairs with corresponding sites that date to approximately the same periods as one another along the eastern coast of the mainland in Attica, Boeotia, and Phthiotis. Together, these sites build not only a local but also an inter-regional network of maritime communication in the Aegean of the Early Bronze Age.

Fig. 4.8. Styra region: map showing the main sites. © M. Kosma.

Fig. 4.9a. Gkisouri, northwest. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photographs by M. Kosma).

Fig. 4.9b. Gkisouri, northeast, with views of one of the Early Helladic II tombs. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photographs by M. Kosma).

Kapsouri Kaphirea

In the northwestern part of Euboea, between the Ochi Mount and the Aegean sea, a new site, Kapsouri Kaphirea, was discovered during works on a wind farm, and rescue excavations were conducted in the second part of 2018 (ID8150; https://www.themata-archaiologias.gr/καψούρι-καηρέα-τα-αποτελέσματα-της/). It occupies a naturally fortified position on three human-made terraces and was in use between the seventh and the third century BC. Two apsidal stone-built buildings were brought to light here, surrounded by cavities. An iron blade, lamps, stone tools, and terracotta balls were discovered. Among the pottery found at the site, an unusual amount of relief pithoi pieces were found, with decoration depicting battles scenes of horsemen, and mythological scenes with winged horses. These finds help to date the foundation of the settlement to the seventh century BC and, together with the location, are an argument for the use of the site as a place of worship maybe dedicated to Poseidon (Parikh Reference Parikh2019: 39–40).

Recent research and publications

During recent years, the numerous fieldwork campaigns conducted have provided abundant new evidence for the prehistoric and historic occupation of sites in southern Euboea (Plakari, Agia Triada, Agios Giorgios, Agia Pelagia, or Gkisouri), highlighting the strategic geographical position of the island for taking advantage of maritime trade (Mavridis and Tankosić Reference Mavridis and Tankosić2016; Cullen et al. Reference Cullen, Talalay, Tankosić, Keller and Katsianis2017; Talalay, Cullen and Keller Reference Talalay, Cullen and Keller2017; a chronological overview of the Karystia is provided in chap. 3. of Wickens et al. Reference Wickens, Rotroff, Cullen, Talalay, Perlès and Mccoy2018: 17–23 [prehistory], 23–34 [historical period]; Prevedorou, Mavridis and Tankosić Reference Prevedorou, Mavridis and Tankosić2019; Crielaard Reference Crielaard2020; Knodell Reference Knodell2021).

During the surveys that have been conducted, a high number of tower structures has been mapped on the two peninsulas that flank ancient Karystos, along with a dispersed settlement pattern of single farmsteads (Chatzidimitriou and Chidiroglou Reference Chatzidimitriou and Chidiroglou2014; Gardner and Seifried Reference Gardner and Seifried2016). Most of the towers date to the Classical period (probably second half of the fifth century BC), though others date from between the Archaic until Ottoman periods. They were used as connection structures across the Karystos bay, serving as lighthouses or resource storehouses (agricultural or mining); their defensive character has also variously been discussed (pro Chatzidimitriou and Chidiroglou Reference Chatzidimitriou and Chidiroglou2014: 320–24; contra Gardner and Seifried Reference Gardner and Seifried2016).

A synthesis on the Archaic to Roman cemeteries of Karystos excavated between 1994 and 2005 was published in 2019 by Maria Chidiroglou (Chidiroglou Reference Chidiroglou2019a, with previous references; Reference Chidiroglou2019b). Six cemeteries were discovered north, west, and east of the modern city, comprising 110 graves with a few funerary goods, including vases, figurines, and jewellery. While in its early phase of development, Karystos probably comprised small, dispersed settlements (Chatzidimitriou and Chidiroglou Reference Chatzidimitriou and Chidiroglou2014: 311; Chiridoglou Reference Chidiroglou2015: 325), from the Early Classical to the Roman period a main civic centre was probably located in modern Kokkaloi and Palaiochora, north of the modern town and south of the Medieval Castello Rosso.

The site of Zarakes, brought to light during rescue excavation work completed in 1997, was the subject of an extensive publication by Athina Chatzidimitriou in 2020 (Figs 4.10 and 4.11; Chatzidimitriou Reference Chatzidimitriou2020, with previous references). The ancient site is located 3km south of the modern settlement of Zarakes. Architectural remains and material dating from the Late Geometric to the Early Byzantine period were discovered during the excavations. A Late Geometric apsidal building (Building Nr. II) was identified as a temple thanks to the material recovered, among which were a fragment of relief pithos dated to the second half of the seventh century BC and decorated with centaurs and bearing the inscription ἱερός (sacred). The continuity of the cult is attested until the fourth century BC, during which time the shrine was dedicated to Delian Apollo, as attested by an inscribed dedication on a bronze weight.

Fig. 4.10. Zarakes: general view of the excavated site. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photograph by A. Chatzidimitriou).

Fig. 4.11. Zarakes: plan of the excavation. © A. Chatzidimitriou.

Southern Euboea – drakospita

The drakospita – literally ‘houses of the dragons’ – are stone constructions, mainly found near Styra, in southern Euboea (Reber et al. Reference Reber, Simosi, Chidiroglou, Chezeaux, André and Stavroulaki2021, with full research history; ID18259, ID18588). Their name is linked to ancient local traditions that suggest the structures were built by anthropomorphic giants. A Greek–Swiss team, led by Karl Reber (ESAG), Aggeliki Simosi, and Maria Chidiroglou (EAE) has recently started new explorations to gain a better understanding of these structures. So far, eight drakospita are known: Kroi-Phtocht, Palli Lakka, Loumithel-Mariza, Limiko/Kapsala, Ilkizes, Makkou, Mount Ochi, and Dardhza. Built of monumental slabs of marble or limestone, they have a distinctive corbelled roof and a paved floor. The various structures do not all date from the same period (the oldest date back to the Classical period) and they appear to have had different functions over time.

At all sites, architectural plans and elevations have been documented, 3D models have been produced, and extensive surveys of the surrounding landscape have been undertaken. Excavations were carried out at two of the sites: Palli Lakka and Ilkizes. With its three buildings, Palli Lakka is the biggest of the sites. Its first occupation is dated between the Classical and Hellenistic periods; occupation then continued in the Roman period, and the site was reused during Medieval times. The proximity of the cipollino marble quarries to the site suggests that the buildings could have been used as dwellings for stone workers. The building located in Ilkizes dates back to the end of the fourth/beginning of the third century BC. Its function was probably devoted to agricultural activities. The only structure devoted to cultic activities seems to be the drakospito at the top of the Mount Ochi, that was identified as a small temple, according to the material found in earlier excavations (Reber et al. Reference Reber, Simosi, Chidiroglou, Chezeaux, André and Stavroulaki2021: 169; Reference Reber, Simosi, André and Chezeaux2023: 82). Final publication including C14 bone analysis will yield new information and will shed light on these special structures (https://www.esag.swiss/fr/regional-studies-surveys/drakospita/).

Ancient quarries

Ancient quarries in Euboea have attracted more attention in recent years. Southern Euboea represents, without doubt, the main stone supplier of the island, and the cipollino light grey to green veined marble is indisputably the most famous due to its wide use trough the Mediterranean (Bruno and Vitti Reference Bruno and Vitti2012). The Hellenic Ministry of Culture discovered three quarries in 2019 during the construction of wind farms close to Karystos (https://www.tornosnews.gr/en/greek-news/culture/34271-three-ancient-quarries-discovered-in-karystos-south-evia-during-installation-of-wind-parks.html). Additionally, the Greek–Swiss research project on the drakospita in southern Euboea gave the opportunity to conduct an extensive exploration of the region and its quarries. Publications in preparation by Chloé Chezeaux (ESAG), Jérôme André (ESAG), and Tommy Vettor include petrographic and chemical analysis of the quarries located close to Palli Lakka. As Maria Chidiroglou has shown in her recent synthesis, cities were exploiting quarries of different types of stones, which were the nearest at hand and most practical (Chidiroglou Reference Chidiroglou2015). This implies that stone resources were extracted in multiple locations. The ongoing Amarynthos project includes an exploration of quarries and extraction techniques in the Eretria-Amarynthos plain. In the frame of this research on ancient building technology, Jérôme André in collaboration with Marilou de Vals (Sorbonne University) will perform petrographic and chemical analyses on building material present in both sites and compare them with quarries samples. As a case study, Chloé Chezeaux mapped the quarries situated in the territory of Eretria and addressed several issues related to their exploitations, such as location, extraction traces, communication routes, and distribution (Chezeaux Reference Chezeaux2022).

Underwater investigations

Between 2006 and 2016 a large underwater survey, the Southern Euboean Gulf Project, was conducted under the direction of the EUA and the Hellenic Institute of the Maritime Archaeology (Koutsouflakis Reference Koutsouflakis2017; Reference Koutsouflakis2018a; https://ienae.gr/ερευνα-νοτίου-ευβοϊκού-κόλπου/). The goal was to explore the coastline in the area extending between Sounion, Kavalliani Island, and Karystos in search of shipwrecks and traces of ancient navigation. Twenty-eight shipwrecks dating from Late Archaic to Late Byzantine period were discovered, and 300 isolated finds were also located, mainly amphoras and anchors. Twenty-three of the vessels were carrying amphoras of the same or mixed type, three of which were also transporting tiles and stones, and two had tableware on board. Among the identifiable wares, for six ships the provenance of the pottery included pieces from Sicily, the Adriatic region, and north Africa. Many anchors were discovered, most of them stone, as well as lead cores or wooden anchors, covering a wide chronological range from the prehistoric until the Late Byzantine period; few of these anchors could be connected to any specific wreck-sites, though (Koutsouflakis Reference Koutsouflakis2018b, many details on the anchors are provided in this article).

Concluding thoughts

The archaeology of Euboea has truly flourished over the last 10 years and this brief review cannot give full justice to all the work that has been done; it merely highlights some of the investigations, although unfortunately leaving many other aspects aside.

It is thanks to the successful completion of these different types of explorations that our understanding of the human occupation of Euboea has expanded so much during the past years. Extensive excavation undertaken during construction works has expanded the map of ancient remains, while systematic digging in the frame of academic projects has improved insights on ancient societies and their traditions. Moreover, intensive and extensive surveys have revealed new sites and occupation patterns, and the publication of results has made new data more available. In addition, international teams have been at work on many projects in association with the Ephorate of the Antiquities of Euboea, showing the importance of collaborations in the scientific community. Naturally, imbalances are still noticeable. If our knowledge in some regions of Euboea – notably the southern part of the island – has grown exponentially, our colleagues are paving the way in expanding research in other areas, such as in the north or in underwater explorations. Undertaking multiple types of investigations with international teams will be key in developing future projects, as well as in preserving and enhancing ancient sites.

References

Ackermann, G. (2020) ‘La céramique d’époque hellénistique. Une chrono-typologie au service de l’histoire d’une ville grecque entre la fin du IVe et le Ier s. av. J.-C.’, in Eretria XXIV, Fouilles et recherches (Gollion)Google Scholar
Ackermann, G. (2022) ‘Artémis et les enfants morts en bas âge. Une nouvelle statuette en bronze de l’Artémis d’Éphèse découverte à Érétrie’, Revue archéologique 74.2, 307–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, G. and André, J. (2020) ‘Les pistes de course du Gymnase d’Érétrie’, Antike Kunst 63, 115–19Google Scholar
Ackermann, G. and Liston, M. (2020) ‘Φρέαρ με ανθρώπινα οστά και χάλκινα αγάλματα. Ένα εντυπωσιακό εύρημα από το γυμνάσιο της Eρέτριας’, Θέματα Αρχαιολογίας 4.3, 312–23Google Scholar
Ackermann, G. and Pop, L. (2020) ‘Une statue de L. Mummius Achaicus au gymnase d’Érétrie?’, Antike Kunst 63, 3654 Google Scholar
Ackermann, G. and Reber, K. (2019) ‘New research on the gymnasium of Eretria’, in U. Mania and M. Trümper (eds), Development of Gymnasia and Graeco-Roman Cityscapes (Berlin) 161–79Google Scholar
Ackermann, G., Tettamanti, R. and Zurbriggen, S. (2015) ‘Fouille E/600 SW (terrain «Sandoz»)’, Antike Kunst 58, 136–43Google Scholar
Ackermann, G., Tettamanti, R., Pop, L. and Reber, K. (2018) ‘Le Gymnase d’Érétrie 2017’, Antike Kunst 61, 124–29Google Scholar
Bruno, M. and Vitti, M. (2012) ‘Cipollino marble quarries south of Karystos at Aghii (Euboea, Greece)’, in A. Gutiérrez Garcia, P. Lapuente Mercadal and I. Rodà de Llanza (eds), Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the IX Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity (ASMOSIA) Conference (Tarragona 2009) (Tarragona) 604–12Google Scholar
Chairetakis, G. (2020) ‘Μια άγνωστη καταστροή της Χαλκίδας κατά τους πρώιμους Eλληνιστικούς χρόνους. Τα στοιχεία από την ανασκαή του οχυρωματικού περιβόλου της πόλης’, in A. Mazarakis Ainian (ed.), 5ο Αρχαιολογικό Έργο Θεσσαλίας και Στερεάς Eλλάδας, Conference Held in Volos (26.2–1.3.2015) (Volos) 943–52Google Scholar
Charalambidou, X. (2017) ‘The pottery from the sacrificial refuse area in Plakari-Karystos: a first assessment’, in Ž. Tankosić, F. Mavridis and M. Kosma (eds), An Island Between Two Worlds: The Archaeology of Euboea from Prehistoric to Byzantine Times (International Conference, Eretria, July 12–14 2013) (Athens) 253–74Google Scholar
Charalambidou, X., Kiriatzi, E., Müller, N., Müller Celka, S., Verdan, S., Huber, S., Gex, K., Ackermann, G., Palaczyk, M. and Maillard, P. (2018) ‘Eretrian ceramic production through time: Geometric to Hellenistic periods’, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 21, 983–94Google Scholar
Chatzidimitriou, A. (2020) ‘Zarakes: a cult site in South Karystia, on the island of Euboea’, in T.E. Cinquantaquattro and M. D’Acunto (eds), Euboica II. Pithekoussai and Euboea between East and West. Proceedings of the Conference, Lacco Ameno (Ischia, Naples), 14–17 May 2018, AION 27.1 (Naples) 135–58Google Scholar
Chatzidimitriou, A. and Chidiroglou, M. (2014) ‘Ancient towers in central and southern Euboea’, in D.W. Rupp and J.E. Tomlinson (eds), Meditations on the Diversity of the Built Environment in the Aegean Basin and Beyond: Proceedings of a Colloquium in Memory of Frederick E. Winter, Athens, 22–23 June 2012 (Athens) 311–37Google Scholar
Chezeaux, C. (2022) Les carrières antiques d’Érétrie: une étude micro-régionale de l’extraction de la pierre (unpublished Master thesis, University of Lausanne)Google Scholar
Chidiroglou, M. (2003–2004) ‘Η Κάρυστος κατά τους πρώιμους ιστορικούς χρόνους: Πορίσματα της ανασκαικής έρευνας στην Πλακαρή’, Αρχείον Eυβοϊκών Μελετών 35, 6980 Google Scholar
Chidiroglou, M. (2014) ‘Classical and Late Classical pottery from the Sanctuary at Plakari, Karystos: first report’, Pharos 20, 53–77Google Scholar
Chidiroglou, M. (2015) ‘Small Euboean quarries: the local community markets’, in P. Pensabene and E. Gasparini (eds), Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone, ASMOSIA X (Rome) 63–72Google Scholar
Chidiroglou, M. (2019a) ‘Κάρυστος Eυβοίας. Νεκροταεία αρχαϊκών έως ρωμαϊκών χρόνων’, in E. Kountouri and A. Gadolou (eds), Σωστικές ανασκαές της Αρχαιολογικής Υπηρεσίας Ι. Τα νεκροταεία. Χωροταξική οργάνωση - Ταικά Έθιμα - Τελετουργίες (Athens) 755–74Google Scholar
Chidiroglou, M. (2019b) ‘Ancient cemeteries in Euboea: old and new finds in their context’, in H. Frielinghaus, J. Stroszeck and P. Valavanis (eds), Griechische Nekropolen. Neue Forschungen und Funde (Möhnesee) 65–88Google Scholar
Crielaard, J.P. (2017) ‘The Early Iron Age site of Karystos-Plakari (southern Euboea) and its wider context’, in A. Mazarakis Ainian, A. Alexandridou and X. Charalambidou (eds), Regional Stories Towards a New Perception of the Early Greek World: Acts of an International Symposium in Honour of Professor Jan Bouzek, Volos 18–21 June 2015 (Volos) 179–96Google Scholar
Crielaard, J.P. (2020) ‘Karystos-Plakari: a ‘pre-Colonial’ foundation in Southern Euboea’, in T.E. Cinquantaquattro and M. D’Acunto (eds), Euboica II. Pithekoussai and Euboea between East and Wes:. Proceedings of the Conference, Lacco Ameno (Ischia, Naples), 14–17 May 2018, AION 27.1 (Naples) 119–34Google Scholar
Crielaard, J.P., Charalambidou, X., Chidiroglou, M., Groot, M., Kluiving, S., Songu, F. and Troelstra, S. (2017) ‘The Plakari Archaeological Project: preliminary report on the sixth field season (2015)’, Pharos 23.2, 67–90Google Scholar
Christodoulou, E. (2015) ‘Θέση Μάνικα, Χαλκίδα’, ADelt 70 B, 459–63Google Scholar
Cullen, T., Talalay, L.E., Tankosić, Ž., Keller, D. and Katsianis, M. (2017) ‘Three puzzles in the prehistory of southern Euboea’, in D.W. Rupp and J.E. Tomlinson (eds), From Maple to Olive: Proceedings of a Colloquium to Celebrate the 40th Anniversary of the Canadian Institute in Greece, Athens, 10–11 June 2016 (Athens) 207–38Google Scholar
Dickinson, O. (2020) ‘The Middle Helladic pottery of Lefkandi Phases IV–VI: an introduction’, BSA 115, 133–74Google Scholar
Fachard, S. (2022) ‘École suisse d’archéologie en Grèce’, Αρχαιολογία και Τέχνες – Archaiologia kai Technes 138, 413 Google Scholar
Fachard, S. and Verdan, S. (2024) ‘Chalcis and Eretria’, in P. Cartledge and P. Christensen (eds), Oxford History of the Archaic Greek World, Vol. 1: Argos to Corcyra (Oxford) 95–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fachard, S., Simosi, A., Krapf, T., Saggini, T., Kyriazi, O., André, J., Chezeaux, C., Greger, D., Verdan, S. and Theurillat, T. (2023) ‘The Artemision at Amarynthos: the 2022 season’, Antike Kunst 66, 93–100Google Scholar
Fachard, S., Simosi, A., Krapf, T., Saggini, T., Kyriazi, O., André, J., Chezeaux, C., Verdan, S. and Theurillat, T. (2024) ‘The Artemision at Amarynthos: the 2023 season’, Antike Kunst 67, 95–104Google Scholar
French, D. and Dickinson, O. (2023) ‘Lefkandi Phase I, with special reference to the pottery, its chronological position, and its Anatolian connections’, BSA 118, 175 Google Scholar
Gardner, C.A.M. and Seifried, R.M. (2016) ‘Euboean towers and Aegean powers: insights into the Karystia’s role in the ancient world’, Journal of Greek Archaeology 1, 149–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gex, K. (2019) Im Zentrum der Stadt. Klassische und hellenistische Funde und Befunde aus dem Grundstück Bouratza (Ausgrabung 1979–1981). Eretria XXIII, Ausgrabungen und Forschungen (Gollion)Google Scholar
Ghilardi, M., Kinnaird, T., Kouli, K., Bicket, A., Crest, Y., Demory, F., Delanghe, D., Fachard, S. and Sanderson, D. (2022) ‘Reconstructing the fluvial history of the Lilas River (Euboea island, central west Aegean Sea) from the Mycenaean times to the Ottoman period’, Geosciences 12, 204, https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12050204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghilardi, M., Müller Celka, S., Theurillat, T., Fachard, S. and Vacchi, M. (2016) ‘Evolution des paysages et histoire de l’occupation d’Érétrie (Eubée, Grèce) du Bronze ancien à l’époque romaine’, in M. Ghilardi (ed.), Géoarchéologie des îles de Méditerranée (Paris), 149–63Google Scholar
Ghilardi, M., Vacchi, M., Curras, A., Müller Celka, S., Theurillat, T., Lemos, I. and Pavlopoulos, K. (2018) ‘Géoarchéologie des paysages littoraux le long du golfe sud-eubéen (île d’Eubée, Grèce) au cours de l’holocène’, Quaternaire 29.2, 95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymans, E.D. and Verdan, S. (2023) ‘Changing patterns in the exploitation, use and significance of gold in the Northern Aegean (1200–600 BCE)’, in N. Nerantzis (ed), Forging Values: Metals Technologies in the Aegean and Beyond From the 4th to the 1st Millennium BCE (Bruxelles) 63–80Google Scholar
Huber, S. and Fachard, S. (2015) ‘L’Athénaion sur le plateau sommital de l’acropole’, Antike Kunst 58, 132–36Google Scholar
Huber, S. and Maillard, P. (2015) ‘Cavaliers et dédicantes: les terres cuites de l’Athénaion et la communauté civique d’Érétrie’, in S. Haxhi-Huysecom and A. Muller (eds), Figurines en contexte : iconographie et fonction(s), Actes du XXXVe symposium international organisé par Halma-Ipel – UMR 8164, Université Charles-de-Gaulle Lille 3, 7–8 décembre 2011, Lille (Villeneuve d’Ascq) 157–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalamara, P. (2020) ‘Η διαχείριση των αρχαιοτήτων στη Βόρεια Eύβοια’, in M. Schäfer and Y. Kalliontzis (eds), Ο αρχαίος κόσμος της Βόρειας Eύβοιας και η επιρροή του στον 21ο αιώνα, Πρακτικά ημερίδας 31 Μαΐου 2014, Λουτρά Αιδηψού (Chalcis) 15–42Google Scholar
Kalamara, P., Katsali, S., Kosma, M., Christodoulou, D. and Ritsonis, A. (2014/2020) ‘ΙΑ΄ Eορεία Προϊστορικών και Κλασσικών αρχαιοτήτων (Eύβοια)’, ADelt 69 B, 1155–230Google Scholar
Kalamara, P., Katsali, S., Christodoulou, E., Klapaki, G. and Kostarelli, A. (2015/2019) ‘Eορεία Αρχαιοτήτων Eύβοιας’, ADelt 70 B, 444–502Google Scholar
Kalamara, P., Katsali, S., Christodoulou, E., Stavroulaki, F. and Kostarelli, A. (2016/2022) ‘Eορεία Αρχαιοτήτων Eύβοιας’, ADelt 71 B, 731–82Google Scholar
Kalliontzis, Y. (2019) ‘Ανάθεση χρημάτων από την Κήρινθο, Χαλκίδα και Βόρεια Eύβοια τον 4ο αι. π.Χ.’, in A.P. Matthaiou and B.N. Mpardani (eds), Στεάνωι Στέανος, Μελέτες εἰς μνήμην Στεάνου Ν. Κουμανούδη (Athens) 293–314Google Scholar
Karatzas, N. (2019) ‘Σωστικές ανασκαές νεκροταείων Λευκαντίου Eυβοίας’, in E. Kountouri and A. Gadolou (eds), Σωστικές ανασκαές της Αρχαιολογικής Υπηρεσίας Ι. Τα νεκροταεία. Χωροταξική οργάνωση - Ταικά Έθιμα - Τελετουργίες (Athens) 711–28Google Scholar
Katsarelia, K. (2018) Une nécropole classique-hellénistique dans la nouvelle usine alimentée au gaz naturel d’Aliveri. Les tombes et ses céramiques (unpublished Master thesis, University of Lausanne)Google Scholar
Katsarelia, K. (2020) ‘Trois stèles funéraires découvertes à Alivéri’, in G. Ackermann, T. Krapf and L. Pop (eds), ἀποβάτης. Mélanges eubéens offerts à Karl Reber par ses étudiant·e·s à l’occasion de son 65ème anniversaire – Euböische Schriften für Karl Reber von seinen Student /-innen aus Anlass seines 65. Geburtstags (Lausanne) 148–53Google Scholar
Knodell, A.R. (2021) Societies in Transition in Early Greece: An Archaeological History (California)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosma, M. (2020) ‘Το Πρωτοελλαδικό νεκροταείο στη θέση Γκισούρι στα Νέα Στύρα Eύβοιας’, in A. Mazarakis Ainian (ed.), 5ο Αρχαιολογικό Έργο Θεσσαλίας και Στερεάς Eλλάδας, Conference held in Volos (26.2–1.3.2015) (Volos), 757–69Google Scholar
Kosma, M. and Chairetakis, G. (2017) ‘Η οχύρωση της Χαλκίδας. Η ανασκαή στον χώρο ανέγερσης του Νέου Γενικού Νοσοκομείου’, in Ž. Tankosić, F. Mavridis and M. Kosma (eds), An Island Between Two Worlds: The Archaeology Of Euboea From Prehistoric To Byzantine Times (International Conference, Eretria, July 12–14 2013) (Athens), 359–70Google Scholar
Koutsouflakis, G. (2017) ‘Υποβρύχια αναγνωριστική έρευνα στο Νότιο Eυβοϊκό (2010–2016). Μέρος Α΄: Πεταλιοί, Μακρόνησος’, Eνάλια 12, 3275 Google Scholar
Koutsouflakis, G. (2018a) ‘Υποβρύχια αναγνωριστική έρευνα στο Νότιο Eυβοϊκό, 2010–2016. Μέρος Β΄: Λαυρεωτική - Νότια Καρυστία’, Eνάλια 13, 1847 Google Scholar
Koutsouflakis, G. (2018b) ‘Αρχαίες άγκυρες από το βυθό του νοτίου Eυβοϊκού’, in A. Simosi (ed.), Βουτιά στα Περασμένα (Athens) 125–52Google Scholar
Lemos, I.S. (2015/2019) ‘Βρετανική Σχολή Αθηνών. Λευκαντί – Ξερόπολη 2015’, ADelt 70 B, 502–08Google Scholar
Lemos, I.S. (2019) ‘The “Ritual Zone” on Xeropolis at Lefkandi: some preliminary thoughts’, in I.S. Lemos and A. Tsingarida (eds), Beyond the Polis: Rituals, Rites and Cults in Early and Archaic Greece (12th–6th Centuries BC) (Brussels) 75–90Google Scholar
Luisoni, G. and Ackermann, G. (2019) ‘La Palestre Sud d’Érétrie’, Antike Kunst 62, 152–56Google Scholar
Mavridis, F. and Tankosić, Ž. (2016) ‘Early Bronze Age burial deposits at the Ayia Triada Cave at Karystos, Euboia: tentative interpretations’, Hesperia 85.2, 207–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazarakis Ainian, A. (2023) ‘Παραπλέοντας τις ανατολικές ακτές της Eύβοιας κατά τους πρώιμους ιστορικούς χρόνους: νέα στοιχεία από την Κήρινθο και την Κεάλα Σκιάθου’, in M. Stefanakis, M. Giannopoulou and M. Achiola (eds), Πολύτροπος, τιμητικός τόμος για τον καθηγητή Νικόλαο Χρ. Σταμπολίδη, vol. 2 (Rethymno), 69–85Google Scholar
Morgan, C. (2014) ‘The work of the British School at Athens, 2013–2014’, AR 60, 2537 Google Scholar
Morgan, C. (2015) ‘The work of the British School at Athens, 2014–2015’, AR 61, 3448 Google Scholar
Parikh, T. (2019) ‘Newsround’, AR 65, 2971 Google Scholar
Prevedorou, E., Mavridis, F. and Tankosić, Ž. (2019) ‘Σπήλαιο Αγίας Τριάδας Καρύστου. Η συμβολή των ανθρωπολογικών καταλοίπων στην ερμηνεία του ταικού συνόλου της πρώιμης εποχής του Χαλκού’, in E. Kountouri and A. Gadolou (eds), Σωστικές ανασκαές της Αρχαιολογικής Υπηρεσίας Ι. Τα νεκροταεία. Χωροταξική οργάνωση - Ταικά Έθιμα -Τελετουργίες (Athens), 729–54Google Scholar
Reber, K., Ackermann, G., Tettamanti, R., Pop, L., Knoepfler, K., Karapaschalidou, A., Krapft, T. and Theurillat, T. (2018) ‘Les activités de l’École suisse d’archéologie en Grèce en 2017’, Antike Kunst 61, 123–37Google Scholar
Reber, K., Simosi, A., André, J. and Chezeaux, C. (2023) ‘Neue Forschungen zu den drakospita im Süden Euböas’, in Treffpunkt Agora 2.0, Schweizer Forschungsprojekte mm Mittelmeerraum (Bern) 80–83, https://www.saka-asac.ch/bulletins Google Scholar
Reber, K., Simosi, A., Chidiroglou, M., Chezeaux, C., André, J. and Stavroulaki, F. (2021) ‘Pour une étude renouvelée des drakospita eubéens. État de la question et résultats des premiers relevés sur le site d’Ilkizès’, Antike Kunst 64, 165–76Google Scholar
Ritsonis, A. (2018) ‘Κήρινθον τ’Eαλόν (Ομήρου Ιλιάδα Β 538). Συμβολή στη μελέτη της ομηρικής αυτής πόλης στη Βόρεια Eύβοια’, AE suppl. 40 (Athens)Google Scholar
Ritsonis, A. (2020) ‘Ο θησαυρός της Altera Arx (Αρχαία Ιστιαία)’, in Schäfer, M. and Kalliontzis, Y. (eds), Ο αρχαίος κόσμος της Βόρειας Eύβοιας και η επιρροή του στον 21ο αιώνα, Πρακτικά ημερίδας 31 Μαΐου 2014, Λουτρά Αιδηψού (Chalcis), 6988 Google Scholar
Sackett, L.H., Hankey, V., Howell, R.J., Jacobson, T.W. and Popham, M.R (1966) ‘Prehistoric Euboea: contributions toward a survey’, BSA 61, 33–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggini, T. (2024) Céramique en contextes. Érétrie au tournant des époques archaïque et classique, Eretria XXVI, Fouilles et recherches (Gollion)Google Scholar
Sampson, A. (1981) Η Νεολιθική και Πρωτοελλαδική Ι στην Eύβοια, Archaiologike Ephemeris 23 (Athens)Google Scholar
Schäfer, M. (2020) ‘Το ιερό της Αρτέμιδος Προσηώας (Αρτεμίσιον): μια σύντομη επισκόπηση’, in Schäfer, M. and Kalliontzis, Y. (eds), Ο αρχαίος κόσμος της Βόρειας Eύβοιας και η επιρροή του στον 21ο αιώνα, Πρακτικά ημερίδας 31 Μαΐου 2014, Λουτρά Αιδηψού (Chalcis), 113–55Google Scholar
Simosi, A. (2022) Arethousa: The Archaeological Museum of Chalkis (Athens)Google Scholar
Talalay, L.E., Cullen, T. and Keller, D.R. (2017) ‘The prehistoric settlement of southern Euboea’, in Ž. Tankosić, F. Mavridis and M. Kosma (eds), An Island Between Two Worlds: The Archaeology of Euboea from Prehistoric to Byzantine Times (International Conference, Eretria, July 12–14 2013) (Athens) 51–66Google Scholar
Tankosić, Ž. and Chidiroglou, M. (2010) ‘The Karystian Kampos Survey Project: methods and preliminary results’, Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 10.3, 11–17Google Scholar
Tankosić, Ž., Laftsidis, A., Psoma, M., Seifried, R.M. and Garyfalopoulos, A. (2021a) ‘New data on southern Euboean landscapes: results of the Norwegian Archaeological Survey in the Karystia’, BSA 116, 133–65Google Scholar
Tankosić, Ž., Mavridis, F., Zafeiriadis, P. and Psoma, A. (2021b) ‘Gourimadi Archaeological Project: the results from the first excavation season (2018) of a prehistoric site in the Karystia, southern Euboea’, Opuscula, Annual of the Swedish Institutes at Athens and Rome 14, 7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theurillat, T., Ackermann, G., Duret, M. and Zurbriggen, S. (2020) Les thermes du centre, Eretria XXV, Fouilles et recherches (Gollion)Google Scholar
Theocharis, D. (1959) ‘Eκ της προϊστορίας της Eύβοιας και της Σκύρου’, Archaiologike Ephemeris 6, 279327 Google Scholar
Verdan, S. and Heymans, E.D. (2020) ‘Men and metals on the move: the case of Euboean gold’, in T.E. Cinquantaquattro and M. D’Acunto (eds), Euboica II. Pithekoussai and Euboea between East and West: Proceedings of the Conference, Lacco Ameno (Ischia, Naples), 14–17 May 2018, AION 27.1, 279–300Google Scholar
Verdan, S., Theurillat, T., Fachard, S. and Ghilardi, M. (2020a) ‘Of dykes and men: Eretria in the making’, in E. Bianchi and M. D’Acunto (eds), Opere di regimentazione delle acque in età arcaica (Rome) 19–36Google Scholar
Verdan, S., Theurillat, T., Krapf, T., Greger, D. and Reber, K. (2020b) ‘The early phases in the Artemision at Amarynthos in Euboea, Greece’, in T.E. Cinquantaquattro and M. D’Acunto (eds), Euboica II. Pithekoussai and Euboea between East and West: Proceedings of the Conference, Lacco Ameno (Ischia, Naples), 14–17 May 2018, AION 27.1, 73–116Google Scholar
Wickens, J.M., Rotroff, S.I., Cullen, T., Talalay, L.E., Perlès, C. and Mccoy, F.W. (2018) Settlement and Land Use on the Periphery: The Bouros-Kastri Peninsula, Southern Euboia (Oxford) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Map 4.1. 1. Kerinthos; 2. Cape Artemision; 3. Oreoi; 4. Histiaea; 5. Limni; 6. Aedipsos; 7. Aliveri; 8. Chalcis; 9. Psachna-Kastella; 10. Lefkandi-Xeropolis; 11. Manika; 12. Eretria; 13. Amarynthos; 14. Gourimadi; 15. Plakari; 16. Gkisouri; 17. Kapsouri Kaphirea; 18. Palli Lakka (drakospito); 19. Ilkizès (drakospito); 20. Kapsala (drakospito).

Figure 1

Fig. 4.1. Eretria: plan of the gymnasium. © ESAG.

Figure 2

Fig. 4.2. Amarynthos: plan of the Artemision. © ESAG.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.3. Amarynthos: drone view of the Artemision. © ESAG.

Figure 4

Fig. 4.4. Southern Euboea: map showing all the survey projects. © R. M. Seifried.

Figure 5

Fig. 4.5. Southern Euboea: map showing the Paximadi and the Bouros-Kastri peninsulae, and major sites. © R.M. Seifried.

Figure 6

Fig. 4.6. Plakari: aerial view of the site. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photograph by J.P. Crielaard and D. Batsis).

Figure 7

Fig. 4.7. Plakari: plan of the site on the hill top. © J.P. Crielaard.

Figure 8

Fig. 4.8. Styra region: map showing the main sites. © M. Kosma.

Figure 9

Fig. 4.9a. Gkisouri, northwest. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photographs by M. Kosma).

Figure 10

Fig. 4.9b. Gkisouri, northeast, with views of one of the Early Helladic II tombs. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photographs by M. Kosma).

Figure 11

Fig. 4.10. Zarakes: general view of the excavated site. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture: Ephorate of Antiquities of Euboea (photograph by A. Chatzidimitriou).

Figure 12

Fig. 4.11. Zarakes: plan of the excavation. © A. Chatzidimitriou.