Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:21:00.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who is deterministic? On the nature of interdisciplinary research in archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

Kristian Kristiansen
Kristian Kristiansen*
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Arponen et al.’s paper is a timely discussion paper which raises basic issues about the relationship between environmental science and archaeology, and thus about the relationship between science and archaeology more broadly. My comments will therefore begin with a discussion of the nature of interdisciplinary research, as a background for re-evaluating the question of determinism in environmental research. Thus more recently we have seen a critical concern or even anxiety emerge over how to reconcile science-based and humanistic traditions of interpretation in a period of expanding importance of science-based knowledge in aDNA studies (Callaway 2018; Sørensen 2017; Kristiansen 2017). It raises the question of their relationship and of what provides good practice.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , June 2019 , pp. 12 - 14
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Callaway, E., 2018: The battle for common ground, Nature 555, Feature News.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 2018: Climatic and human impact on the environment? A question of scale, Quarternary international 496, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, K.M., and Frei, R., 2011: The geographic distribution of strontium isotopes in Danish surface waters. A base for provenance studies in archaeology, hydrology and agriculture, Applied geochemistry 26, 326–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, T.K., Diachenko, A., Rassamakin, Y.Y. and Kennett, D.J., 2019: Ecological dimensions of population dynamics and subsistence in Neo-Eneolithic Eastern Europe, Journal of anthropological archaeology 53, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 2014: Towards a new paradigm? The third science revolution and its possible consequences in archaeology, Current Swedish archaeology 22, 11–34.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 2017: The nature of archaeological knowledge and its ontological turns, Norwegian archaeological review, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1372802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinon-Torres, M., 2018: Mobility, minds and metal. The end of archaeological science?, in Armada, X.-L., Mourillo-Barosso, M. and Charlton, M. (eds), Metal, minds and mobility. Integrating scientific data with archaeological theory, Oxford, 161–69.Google Scholar
Müller, J., 2016: From the Neolithic to the Iron Age. Demography and social agglomeration: the development of centralized control?, in Fernandez-Götz, D.K.M. (ed.), Individualization, urbanization and social differentiation. Eurasia at the dawn of history, Cambridge, 106–24.Google Scholar
Noble, G., 2017: Woodland in the Neolithic of Northern Europe. The forest as ancestor, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radivojevic, M., Roberts, B.J., Pernicka, E., Stos-Gale, Z., Martinon-Torres, M., Rehren, T., Bray, P., Brandherm, D., Ling, J., Mai, J., Vandkilde, H., Kristiansen, K., Shennan, S.J. and Broodbank, C., 2018: The provenance, use and circulation of metals in the European Bronze Age. The state of the debate, Journal of archaeological research, at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-018-9123-9.Google Scholar
Roberts, N., Fyfe, R.M., Woodbridge, J., Gaillard, M.-J., Davis, B.A.S., Kaplan, J.O., Marquer, L., Mazier, F., Nielsen, A.B., Sugita, S., Trondman, A.-K. and Leydet, M., 2018: Europe’s lost forests. A pollen-based synthesis for the last 11, 000 years. Nature communications 8(716), DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-18646-7.Google ScholarPubMed
Sørensen, T.F., 2017: The two cultures and a world apart. Archaeology and science at a new crossroads, Norwegian archaeological review 50(2), 101–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, H. (ed.), 2017: Megadrought and collapse. From early agriculture to Angkor, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar