Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:07:23.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent developments in Dutch archaeology

A scientific-historical outline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Jan Slofstra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two stereotype views exist with respect to recent developments in Dutch archaeology. The first holds that the confrontation with New Archaeology in 1968/69 signalled the beginning of an entirely new period in Dutch archaeology. At that point, Dutch archaeologists were first involved in international theoretical discussions, which they have more or less followed ever since. This resulted in the emergence of counterparts in Dutch archaeology of New (or processual) Archaeology, and later of post-processual approaches.

Type
Discussion Article
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 9 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbink, A.A., 1986: Structured allocation and cultural strategies, in Brandt, R.W., van der Leeuw, S.E. and Kooijman, M.J.A.N. (eds), Gedachten over Assendelft, 23–32.Google Scholar
Arts, N., and Deeben, J., 1981: Prehistorische jagers en verzamelaars te Vessem: Een model, Eindhoven (Bijdragen tot de studie van het Brabantse Heem 20).Google Scholar
Bakels, C.C., 1978: Four Linearbandkeramik settlements and their environment. A palaeoecological study of Sittard, Stein, Elsloo and Hinheim, Leiden (Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 11).Google Scholar
Bakels, C.C., 1982: The settlement system of the Dutch Linearbandkeramik, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 15, 31–43.Google Scholar
Bakker, J.A., 1979: The TRB West Group. Studies in the chronology and geography of the makers of the Hunebeds and Tiefstich pottery, Amsterdam (Cingula 5).Google Scholar
Bakker, J.A., 1982: TRB settlement patterns on the Dutch sandy soils, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 15, 87–124.Google Scholar
Besteman, J.C., Bos, J.M. and Heidinga, H.A. (eds), 1990: Medieval archaeology in the Netherlands. Studies presented to H.H. van Regteren Altena, Assen and Maastricht (Studies in Prae- en Protohistorie 4).Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., 1978: Rijswijk (Z.H.), ‘De Bult’. Eine Siedlung der Cananefaten, Amersfoort (Nederlandse Oudheden 8).Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., 1983: Acculturation in the Rhine/Meuse Basin in the Roman period: a preliminary survey, in Brandt, R. and Slofstra, J. (eds), 159–209.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., 1988: Periphery in pre- and protohistory: structure and process in the Rhine-Meuse basin between c. 600 B.C. and 500 A.D., in Jones, R.F.J., Bloemers, J.H.F., Dyson, S.L. and Biddle, M. (eds), First millenium papers. Western Europe in the first millenium AD, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports, International Series 401), 11–35.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., 1990: Lower Germany: plura consilio quam vi. Proto-urban settlement developments and the integration of native society, in Blagg, T. and Millett, M. (eds), The Early Roman empire in the West, Oxford, 72–86.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., Hulst, R.S. and Willems, W.J.H., 1980: A short introduction to the Eastern River Area (ERA) Project, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 30, 277–280.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., and Borger, G.J., 1988: Cultural history and environmental planning: research and policy for the future, in van Wijngaarden-Bakker, L.H. and van der Meer, J.J.M. (eds), Spatial sciences, research in progress, Amsterdam (Nederlandse Geografische Studies 80), 53–67.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., van Pelt, C.W. and Perk, F.A., 1991: Cultuurhistorie en milieu in 2015. Op weg naar een landschap zonder verleden?, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., and van Dorp, T. (eds), 1991: Pre- & Protohistorie van de Lage Landen, Houten.Google Scholar
Bogaers, J.E., 1955: De Gallo-Romeinse tempels te Elst in de Over-Betuwe, Den Haag (Nederlandse Oudheden 1).Google Scholar
Bogaers, J.E., 1961: Civitas en stad van de Bataven en Cananefaten, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 10/11, 263–317.Google Scholar
Brandt, R.W., 1980: De kolonisatie van West-Friesland in de Bronstijd, in Bos, J.M., Kalee, C.A., Pot, T. and Wttewaal, O.J. (eds), Nederzettingsarcheologie in Nederland, Bussum, 53–67.Google Scholar
Brandt, R.W., van der Leeuw, S.E. and Voorrips, A., 1979: Regionale relaties. Een archeologisch onderzoek naar de nederzettingspatronen in de Zaanstreek gedurende de (Romeinse) IJzertijd, Amsterdam (MS).Google Scholar
Brandt, R.W., and IJzereef, G.F., 1980: West Friesland in de Bronstijd. Leven en sterven ‘binnen de grenzen van een model’, in Chamalaun, M. and Waterbolk, H.T. (eds), 47–62.Google Scholar
Brandt, R., and Slofstra, J. (eds), 1983: Roman and Native in the Low Countries. Spheres of interaction, Oxford(British Archaeological Reports, International Series 184).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R.W., van der Leeuw, S.E. and van Wijngaarden-Bakker, L.H., 1984: Transformation in a Dutch estuary: research in a wet landscape, World archaeology 16, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, R.W., Groenman-van Waateringe, W. and van der Leeuw, S.E. (eds), 1987: Assendelver Polder papers 1, Amsterdam (Cingula 10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J.J., 1963: Bronze Age connections across the North Sea. A study in prehistoric trade and industrial relations between the British Isles, the Netherlands, North Germany and Scandinavia, c. 1700–700 B.C., Groningen(Palaeohistoria 9).Google Scholar
Chamalaun, M., and Waterbolk, H.T. (eds), 1980: Voltooid verleden tijd? Een hedendaagse kijk op de prehistorie, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1931: Skara Brae, London.Google Scholar
Claessen, H.J.M., and van de Velde, P., 1991: Archaeologists in the Netherlands and their use of anthropology, in Kloos, P. and Claessen, H.J.M. (eds), Contemporary anthropology in the Netherlands. The use of anthropological ideas, Amsterdam (Anthropological Studies Free University), 45–63.Google Scholar
Clark, G., 1933: Report on an Early Bronze Age site in the South-Eastern Fens, The Antiquaries Journal 13, 266–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbey, R., 1989: Wildheid in onszelf?, in Corbey, R., Wildheid en beschaving. De Europese verbeelding van Afrika, Baarn, 105–121.Google Scholar
Corbey, R., 1991: Freud's phylogenetic narrative, in Corbey, R. and Leerssen, J. (eds), Alterity, identity, image; selves and others in society and scholarship, Amsterdam and Atlanta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Es, W.A.,1968: Wijster, a native village beyond the imperial frontier 150–425 A.D., Groningen (Palaeohistoria 11).Google Scholar
van Es, W.A., 1990: Dorestad centred, in Besteman, J.C., Bos, J.M. and Heidinga, H.A. (eds), 151–182.Google Scholar
van Es, W.A., and Verwers, W.J.H., 1980: Excavations at Dorestad 1. The harbour: Hoogstraat 1, Amersfoort (Nederlandse Oudheden 9).Google Scholar
van Es, W.A., Sarfatij, H. and Woltering, P.J. (eds),1988: Archeologie in Nederland. De rijkdom van het bodemarchief, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fokkens, H., 1991: Verdrinkend landschap. Archeologisch onderzoek van het westelijk Fries-Drents plateau 4400 BC to 500 AD, Groningen (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Fokkens, H., and Roymans, N. (eds),1991: Nederzettingen uit de Bronstijd en de Vroege IJzertijd in de Lage Landen, Amersfoort (Nederlandse Archeologische Rapporten 13).Google Scholar
Fox, C.F., 1923: The Archaeology of the Cambridge Region, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van Giffen, A.E., 1930: Die Bauart der Einzelgräber: Beitrag zur Kenntniss der älteren individuellen Grabhügelstrukturen in den Niederlanden, Leipzig (Mannus Bibliothek 44/45).Google Scholar
van Giffen, A.E., 1936: Der Warf Ezinge, Provinz Groningen, Holland, und seine westgermanischen Hauser, Germania 20, 40–47.Google Scholar
Glasbergen, W., 1954: Barrow excavations in the Eight Beatitutes. The Bronze Age cemetry between Toterfout & Halve Mijl, North Brabant, Groningen and Jakarta.Google Scholar
Glasbergen, W., 1967: De Romeinse castella te Valkenburg Z.H., Groningen (Cingula 1).Google Scholar
Groenman-van Waateringe, W., 1980: Urbanization and the Northwest frontier of the Roman empire, in Hanson, W.S. and Keppie, L.J.F. (eds), Roman frontier studies 1979. Papers presented to the 12th international congress of Roman frontier studies, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports, International Series 71), 1037–1044.Google Scholar
Groenman-van Waateringe, W., 1983: The disastrous effect of the Roman occupation, in Brandt, R. and Slofstra, J. (eds), 147–157.Google Scholar
Groenman-van Waateringe, W., and Pals, J.P., 1979: The Assendelver Polders project: an integrated ecological approach, in Jones, M. (ed.), Integrating the subsistence economy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Groenman-van Waateringe, W., and Wijngaarden-Bakker, L.H., 1987: Farm life in a Carolingian village. A model based on botanical and zoological data from an excavated site, Assen etc.(Studies in Prae- en Protohistory 1).Google Scholar
Hallewas, D.P., 1981: Archaeological cartography between Marsdiep and IJ, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voorhet Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 31, 219–272.Google Scholar
Hallewas, D.P., and van Regteren Altena, J.F., 1980: Bewoningsgeschiedenis en landschapsontwikkeling rond de Maasmond, in Verhulst, A. and Gotschalk, M.K.E. (eds), Transgressies en occupatiegeschiedenis in de kustgebieden van Nederland en België, Gent, 155–207.Google Scholar
Härke, H., 1989: The Unkel symposia: the beginning of a debate in West German archaeology?, Current Anthropology 30, 406–410.Google Scholar
Harsema, O.H., 1980: Drents boerenleven, Assen.Google Scholar
Heidinga, H.A., 1987: Medieval settlement and economy north of the Lower Rhine, Assen (Cingula 9).Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982: Sequences of structural change in the Dutch Neolithic, in I., Hodder (ed.),Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge (New Directions in Archaeology), 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1991a: Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1991b: Archaeological theory in contemporary European societies. The emergence of competing traditions, in I., Hodder (ed.), 1991a, 1–24.Google Scholar
IJzereef, G.F., 1981: Bronze Age animal bones from Bovenkarspel. The excavation at Het Valkje, Amersfoort, (Nederlandse Oudheden 10).Google Scholar
van Iterson Scholten, F.R., de Vries-Metz, W.H., 1981: A Late Neolithic Settlement at Aartswoud, Helinium 21, 105–134.Google Scholar
Kielstra, N., 1981: Civilisatie of verwildering; Elias, Moscovici en de menselijke natuur, Symposion 3, 6–19.Google Scholar
Kooi, P.B., 1979: Pre-Roman urnfields in the north of the Netherlands, Groningen.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T.S., 1962: The structure of scientific revolutions, in O. Neurath (ed.), International encyclopedia of unified science 2.2.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I., 1970: Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, Cambridge, 91–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanting, J.N., and van der Waals, J.D., 1976: Glockenbecher symposiam Obenied 1974, Bussum and Haarlem.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1974: The methodological debate in archaeology: fundamental questions, Helinium 14, 174–185.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1976: Studies in the technology of ancient pottery, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1980: Ceramic exchange and manufacture: a ‘flow structure approach’, in Howard, H. and Morris, E.L. (eds), Production and distribution, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports, International Series 120), 361–386.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1981: Information flows, flow structures and the explanation of change in human institutions, in van der Leeuw, S.E. (ed.), Archaeological approaches to the study of complexity, Amsterdam, 230–239.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1983: Acculturation as information processing, in Brandt, R. and Slofstra, J. (eds), 11–41.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., and Voorrips, A., 1980: Moderne ontwikkelingen in de archeologie, in Chamalaun, M. and Waterbolk, H.T. (eds), 213–227.Google Scholar
Lohof, E., 1991: Grafritueel en sociale verandering in de Bronstijd in Noordoost-Nederland, Amsterdam (PhD thesis)Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1974: The Rhine/Meuse delta. Four studies on its prehistoric occupation and the Holocene geology, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1976: Local development in a borderland: a survey of the Neolithic at the Lower Rhine, Oudheidkundige Mededelingen van het Rijksmuseum van Oudheden Leiden 57, 227–297.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1980: Het onderzoek van neolitische nederzettingsterreinen in Nederland anno 1979, in Bos, J.M., Kalee, C.A., Pot, T. and Wttewaal, O.J. (eds), Nederzettingsarcheologie in Nederland, Haarlem, 93–136.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1985: Sporen in het land. De Nederlandse delta in de prehistoric, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1987a: Neolithic settlement and subsistence in the wetlands of the Rhine/Meuse delta of the Netherlands, in Coles, J.M. and Lawson, A.J. (eds), European wetlands in prehistory, Oxford, 227–251.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1987b: Nieuwe bezems door oud vuil. Veranderingen in het beeld van de Nederlandse prehistoric de laatste twintig jaar, Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 102, 541–561.Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1992: Een waardering van het bodemarchief, Westerheem 41, 53–68.Google Scholar
McMullin, E., 1970: The history and philosophy of science. A taxonomy, in Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science 5, Minneapolis, 12–67.Google Scholar
Maso, B., 1978: Beheersing en scheidslijnen. Een kritiek op de civilisatietheorie van Norbert Elias, Amsterdams Sociologisch Tijdschrift 5, 258–283.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R., 1953: Een neolithische woonplaats in de polder Vriesland onder Hekelingen, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 4, 1–25.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R., 1958/1959: Die bandkeramische Siedlung von Sittard, Palaeohistoria 6/7, 33–120.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R., 1960–1961: De Spanjaardsberg, voor- en vroeghistorische boerenbedrijven te Santpoort, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 10–11, 210–262.Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R., 1970: Linearbandkeramik aus Elsoo und Stein, Den Haag (Nederlandse Oudheden 3).Google Scholar
Modderman, P.J.R., 1985: Die Bandkeramik im Graetheidegebiet, Niederlandisch-Limburg, Berichte der Rb'misch-Germanische Kommission 66, 25–121.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., 1973: The post-glacial adaptations of the indigenous populations of the Northwest European plains, in Kozlowski, S.K. (ed.), The Mesolithic in Europe, Warsaw, 399–440.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., 1984a: Settlement systems in the Dutch Mesolithic: setting the record straight, Helinium 24, 44–52.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., 1984b: On the Mesolithic contribution to the social evolution of Western European society, in Bintliff, J.(ed.), European social evolution. Archaeological perspectives, Bradford, 69–82.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., and Vroomans, A.P.J., 1972: Automatic artifact registration and systems for archaeological analysis with the Philips PI 100 Computer: a Mesolithic test case, Oosterhout.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., and Dekin, A.A., 1978: An integrative strategy for the definition of behaviorally meaningful archaeological units, Palaeohistoria 20, 7–38.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., and Constandse-Westermann, T.S., 1985: Reflections on the transition from the Late Palaeolithic to the Mesolithic in Western Europe, Palaeohistoria 27, 123–127.Google Scholar
Newell, R.R., and Constandse-Westermann, T.S., 1986: Testing an ethnographic analogue of Mesolithic social structure and the archaeological resolution of Mesolithic ethnic groups and breeding populations, Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B 89, 243–310.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., 1978: Mesolithic settlement systems in the Netherlands, in Mellars, P. (ed.), The early postglacial settlement of Northern Europe, London, 81–113.Google Scholar
Price, T.D., Whallon, R. and Chappell, S., 1974: Mesolithic sites near Havelte, province of Drenthe (Netherlands). A preliminary report of the Havelte project (Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan and Biologisch-Archeologisch Instituut, State University of Groningen), Palaeohistoria 16, 7–61.Google Scholar
Regteren Altena, J.F., et al. , 1962: The Vlaardingen culture, Helinium 2, 3–35, 97–103, 215–243.Google Scholar
Regteren Altena, J.F., et al. , 1963: The Vlaardingen culture, Helinium 3, 39–45, 97–120.Google Scholar
Regteren Altena, H.H., 1990: On the growth of young medieval archaeology: a recollection, in Besteman, J.C., Bos, J.M. and , H.A.Heidinga (eds), 1–7. 53Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., 1989: From findscatters to early hominid behaviour. A study of Middle Palaeolithic riverside settlements of Maastricht-Belvéedère (the Netherlands), Leiden (Analecta PraehistoricaLeidensia 21).Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., 1990: Oermensen in Nederland. De archeologie van de Oude Steentijd, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., 1992: Changing views of Ice Age Foragers: an interdisciplinary appraoch to the Palaeolithic of Northern Europe (a research proposal), Leiden (MS).Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., Conard, NJ. and van Kolfschoten, T., 1992: Dense forests, cold steppes, and the settlement of Northern Europe (with comments and reply), Current Anthropology 33, 551–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roymans, N., 1983: The North Belgic tribes in the 1st century B.C.: a historical-anthropological perspective, in Brandt, R.W. and Slofstra, j. (eds), 43–69.Google Scholar
Roymans, N., 1990: Tribal societies in Northern Gaul. An anthropological perspective, Amsterdam (Cingula 12).Google Scholar
Roymans, N., and Theuws, F., 1990: The Pionier project ‘Power and Elite: An introduction, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Roymans, N., and Theuws, F. (eds), 1991: Images of the past. Studies on ancient societies in Northwestern Europe, Amsterdam (Studies in Prae- en Protohistorie 7).Google Scholar
Sanden, W.A.B., and van den Broeke, P.W. (eds), 1987: Getekend zand. Tien jaar archeologisch onderzoek in Oss-Ussen, Waalre (Bijdragen tot de studie van het Brabants Heem 31).Google Scholar
Sanden, W.A.B., 1990: Mens en moeras. Veenlijken in Nederland van de Bronstijd tot en met de Romeinse tijd, Assen.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1974: Ecological and systems approaches to prehistoric archaeology: a summary of recent discussion, Helinium 14, 163–173.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1983: An anthropological approach to the study of romanization processes, in Brandt, R. and Slofstra, J. (eds), 71–104.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J. et al. , 1982: Het Kempenprojekt. Een regionaal-archeologisch onderzoeksprogramma, Waalre (Bijdragen tot de studie van het Brabants Heem 22).Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1990: Omtrekken van een historisch-antropologische benaderingswijze in de archeologie (unpublished MS).Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., and van der Sanden, W.A.B., 1987: Rurale cultusplaatsen uit de Romeinse tijd in het Maas-Demer-Scheldegebied, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 20, 125–168.Google Scholar
Stapert, D., 1992: Rings and sectors. Intrasite spatial analysis of Stone Age sites, Groningen (PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Therkorn, L.L., 1987: The inter-relationships of materials and meanings: some suggestions on houses within Iron Age Noord-Holland, in Hodder, I. (ed.), The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings, Cambridge, 102–110.Google Scholar
Therkorn, L.L., 1991: De empirische cyclus in werking: het Assendelver Polder-project, in Bloemers, J.H.F. and van Dorp, T. (eds), 157–170.Google Scholar
Theuws, F.C.W.J., 1986: The integration of the Kempen region in the Frankish empire: some hypotheses, Helinium 26, 121–136.Google Scholar
Theuws, F.C.W.J., 1988: De archeologie van de periferie. Studies naar de ontwikkeling van bewoning en samenleving in het Maas-Demer-Scheldegebied in de Vroege Middeleeuwen, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Theuws, F.C.W.J., 1990: Centre and periphery in Northern Austrasia (6th-8th century). An 54 archaeological perspective, in Besteman, J.C., Bos, J.M. and Heidinga, H.A. (eds.), 41–69.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van de Velde, P., 1979a: On Bandkeramik social structure. An analysis of pot decoration and hut distributions from the Central European neolithic communities of Elsloo and Hienheim, Leiden (Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 12).Google Scholar
van de Velde, P., 1979b: The social anthropology of a Neolithic graveyard in the Netherlands (with comments and reply), Current Anthropology 20, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, A., and Theuws, F. (eds), 1989: Het Kempenprojekt 3. De Middeleeuwen centraal, Waalre (Bijdragen tot de studie van het Brabantse Heem 33).Google Scholar
Verwers, G.J., 1974: Das Kamps Veld in Haps in Neolithikum, Bronzezeit und Eisenzeit, Leiden (Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 5).Google Scholar
Voss, J.A., 1982: A study of Western TRB social organization, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 32, 9–102.Google Scholar
Waals, J.D., 1969: Praehistorie en mythevorming, Groningen.Google Scholar
Waals, J.D., 1980: Oudheid en grootheid. Archeologie en nationalisme, in Chamalaun, M. and Waterbolk, H.T. (eds), 245–257.Google Scholar
Waals, J.D., 1984: Discontinuity, cultural evolution and the historic event, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 114, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waals, J.D., and Glasbergen, W., 1955: Beaker types and their distribution in the Netherlands, Palaeohistoria 4, 5–46.Google Scholar
Waals, J.D., and Waterbolk, H.T., 1976: Excavations at Swifterband: discovery, progress, aims and methods, Helinium 16, 3–14.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1954: De prehistorische mens en zijn milieu. Een palynologisch onderzoek naar de menselijke invloed op de plantengroei van de diluviale gronden in Nederland, Assen.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1974: F Archeologie en Europe, une reaction contre le ‘new archaeology’, Helinium 4, 135–162.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1977: Albert Egges van Giffen (Noordhorn 14 maart 1884 – Zwolle 31 mei 1973), Jaarboek van de Maatschappij der Nedertandse Letterkunde te Leiden 1975-1976, 122–153.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1979a: Nieuwe lijnen in de archeologie sinds 1945, in Onder de ‘Z.W.O.-banier”. Opstellen aangeboden aan Dr.J.H. Banier ter gelegenheid van zijn 70ste verjaardag, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1979b: Siedlungskontinuitat im Kiistengebiet der Nordsee zwischen Rhein und Elbe, Probleme der Kiistenforschung im siidlichen Nordseegebiet 13, 1–21.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1980: Het vak prehistoric. Karakter, doel en werkwijze, in Chamalaun, M. and Waterbolk, H.T. (eds), 9–20.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1981: Archaeology in the Netherlands: delta archaeology, World Archaeology 13, 240–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1982: Mobilitat von Dorf, Ackerflur und Graberfeld in Drenthe seit der Latenezeit; archSologische Siedlungsforschungen auf der niederlandischen Geest, Offa 39, 97–137.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1990a: Archaeology in the modern world, in Ziircher, E. and Langendorff, T. (eds), The humanities in the nineties. A view from the Netherlands, Amsterdam, 297–336.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., 1990b: Archeologie en landschapsgeschiedenis, in Bloemers, J.H.F., van Pelt, C.W. and Perk, F.A. (eds), 5–9.Google Scholar
Willems, W.J.H., 1986: Romans and Batavians. a regional study in the Dutch Eastern River Area, Amersfoort.Google Scholar
Woltering, P.J., 1975: Occupation history of Texel, 1. The excavations at Den Burg: preliminary report, Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek 25, 7–36.Google Scholar