Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:01:32.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On complementarity of practice, scale and structure. Scalar aspects of social/material space in Anatolian peri-urban contexts in antiquity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2015

LuAnn Wandsnider
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his illuminating article, Christophersen rethinks concepts in and approaches to the archaeological study of urban living, focusing especially on medieval urban towns in Scandinavia. He recruits various concepts – interaction, event, leakage and creativity – from a materially imbued social-practice theory to explore the urban landscapes as a complex of dynamic social spaces. Christophersen draws from scholars (Hodder 2012; Reckwitz 2002; Schatzki 1996; Shove, Pantzar and Watson 2012) who emphasize that practice is routinized behaviour through which actions and events are performed, that practices are tied to a place and timescape, that social actors live with and interact with materials, and that materials may be the media of interaction with others. Following Hodder (2012), he emphasizes that the nature and quality of social and material relationships lead to the formation and stabilization of practices. In turn, this practice constitutes the town or city.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , December 2015 , pp. 149 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amin, A., and Thrift, N., 2007: Cultural-economy and cities, Progress in human geography 31, 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, H., 1997: Tradition and renewal, in Andersson, H., Carelli, P. and Ersgård, L. (eds), Visions of the past. Trends and traditions in Swedish medieval archaeology, Stockholm (Lund Studies in Medieval Archaeology 19, Riksantikvarieämbetet Arkeologiska undersökningar. Skrifter Nr. 24), 11–22.Google Scholar
Andrén, A., 1995: Signs of communities. The iconography of early towns in Denmark, in Ersgård, L. (ed.), Thirteen esays on medieval artefacts, Lund (Meddelanden från Lunds universitets historiska museum 1993–1995), 55–70.Google Scholar
Andrén, A., 1998: Från antiken til antiken. Stadsvisioner i Skandinavien före 1700, in Riksmuseet, Naturhistoriska, Museet, Nordiska and Museum, Folkens (eds), Staden himmel eller helvete. Tankar om människan i staden, Stockholm, 142–93.Google Scholar
Anglert, M., 2006: Landskapets urbanitet, in Larsson, S. (ed.), Nya stadsarkeologiska horisonter, Stockholm, 229–70.Google Scholar
Anglert, M., 2009: Landskapets mangfald. Regional variation i Skåne ca. 1400–1700, in Mogren, M., Roslund, M., Sundnér, B. and Wienberg, J. (eds), Triangulering. Historisk arkeologi vidgar fälten, Lund (Lund Studies in Historical Archaeology 11), 33–46.Google Scholar
Anglert, M., and Larsson, S., 2008: Landskapets urbanitet og urbanitetens landskap, in Andersson, H., Hansen, G. and Øye, I. (eds), De første 200 årene. Nytt blikk på 27 skandinaviske middelalderbyer, Bergen (Universitetet i Bergen Arkeologiske Skrifter, UBAS Nordisk Nr. 5), 303–22.Google Scholar
Bäck, M., 2009: Stadsarkeologiska trender och tendenser I Sverige. En personlig synvinkel, in Brendalsmo, J., Eliassen, F.-I. and Gansum, T. (eds), Den urbane underskog. Strandsteder, utviklingssteder og småbyer I vikingtid, middelalder og tidlig nytid, Oslo, 41–66.Google Scholar
Bergquist, U., 1989: Gjutning och smide. Metallhantverkets utveckling i Trondheim ca. 1000–1350, Trondheim (Fortiden i Trondheim bygrunn: Meddelelser Nr. 16).Google Scholar
Bill, J., 1999: Port topography in medieval Denmark, in Bill, J. (ed.), The maritime topography of the medieval town, Copenhagen (PNM Studies in Archaeology & History 4), 251–61.Google Scholar
Blom, G.A., 1997: Hellig Olavs by. Middelalder til 1537. Trondheims historie 1997–1997, bnd. 1, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Brendalsmo, J., 2009: I gråsonen mellom gården og byen. Et kildeproblem eller et definisjonsspørsmål?, in Brendalsmo, J., Eliassen, F.-I. and Gansum, T. (eds), Den urbane underskog. Strandsteder, utviklingssteder og småbyer I vikingtid, middelalder og tidlig nytid, Oslo, 147–84.Google Scholar
Casana, J., and Herrmann, J.T., 2010: Settlement history and urban planning at Zincirli Höyük, southern Turkey, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 23 (1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophersen, A., 1990: Dwelling houses, workshops and storehouses. Functional aspects of the developement of wooden urban buildings in Trondheim from c. A.D. 1000 to c. A.D. 1400, Acta archaeologica 60, 101–29.Google Scholar
Christophersen, A., 1997: ‘. . . Og han sat der lenge og vakta landet’. Momenter til en diskusjon om Konghelle i middelalderen, META 2 (1997), Lund, 14–32.Google Scholar
Christophersen, A., 1999a: Norm, handling og identitet. Om boligkultur og sosial romliggjøring i urbane miljøer i norsk middelalder, in Mundal, E. and Øye, I. (eds), Norm og praksis i middelaldersamfunnet, Bergen, 116–48.Google Scholar
Christophersen, A., 2000a: Byen er død. Så hva gjør vi med historien? META 2 (2000), Lund, 3–15.Google Scholar
Christophersen, A., 2000b: Hvilken byhistorie? Byhistorie i skjæringspunktet mellom ting og tekst, in Supphellen, S. (ed.), Norsk byhistorie. Tid for syntese? Trondheim (Skriftserie fra Historisk Institutt Nr. 30), 61–70.Google Scholar
Christophersen, A., 2001: The shaping of urban landscapes in medieval Norway: Concepts and considerations, in Brandt, R.J. and Karlsson, L. (eds), From huts to houses. Transformations of ancient societies, Stockhom (Proceedings of an International Seminar Organized by the Norwegian and Swedish Institutes in Rome 21–24 September 1997), 101–8.Google Scholar
Damsholt, T., and Simonsen, D.G., 2009: Materialiseringer. Process, relationer og performativitet. In T. Damsholt, D.G. Simonsen and C. Mordhorst (eds), Materialiseringer. Nye perspektiver på materialitet og kulturanalyser, Århus Universitetsforlag, 9–38.Google Scholar
Deggim, D., 1999: Arbeit in nordeuropäische Hafenstädten, in Bill, J. and Clausen, B.L. (eds), Maritime topography and the medieval town. Papers from the 5th International Conference on Waterfront Archaeology in Copenhagen, 14–16 May 1998, Copenhagen (Publications from The National Museum Studies in Archaeology & History 4), 33–44.Google Scholar
Eliassen, F.-E., 2009: Ladesteder og strandsteder. Havner, husklynger – og byer? Skiftende realiteter fra middelalderen til 1800-tallet, in Brendalsmo, J., Eliassen, F.-I. and Gansum, T. (eds), Den urbane underskog. Strandsteder, utviklingssteder og småbyer I vikingtid, middelalder og tidlig nytid, Oslo, 133–45.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1984: The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Griffith, D., 2013: Living in Viking-age towns, in Hadley, D.M. and Harkel, L. ten (eds), Everyday life in Viking-age towns. Social approaches to towns in England and Ireland c.800–1100, Oxford, 14–34.Google Scholar
Grundberg, L., 2006: Medeltid i centrum. Europeisering, historieskrivning och kulturarvsbruk i norrländska kulturmiljöer, Umeå.Google Scholar
Gundersen, J., 2001: Nidelva som havn 700–1816, in Sæther, B. (ed.), Trondheim, havn i tusen år, Trondheim, 61–69.Google Scholar
Hadley, D.M., and Harkel, L. ten, 2013: Preface, in Hadley, D.M. and Harkel, L. ten (eds), Everyday life in Viking-age towns. Social approaches to towns in England and Ireland c.800–1100, Oxford, vii–xii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, G., 2000: Bydannelse og forklaring af sociale fænomener. Individualisme, kollektivisme og Giddens strukturationsteori, META 4 (2000), Lund, 2–16.Google Scholar
Hansen, G., 2004: Bergen c 800–c 1170. The emergence of a town, Bergen.Google Scholar
Haugland, H., 2012: Fellesskap og brorskap. En skomparativ undersøkelse av gildenes sosiale, religiøse og rettslige rolle i et utvalg nordiske byer fra midten av 1200-tallet til reformasjonen, Phil. Dr. thesis, University of Bergen, 2012.Google Scholar
Helle, K., 2006: Fra opphavet til omkring 1500 (Del 1), in Helle, K., Eliassen, F.-E., Myhre, J.E. and Stugu, O.S. (eds), Norsk byhistorie. Urbanisering gjennom 1300 år, Oslo, 23–123.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2012: Entangled. An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things, Chichester.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, J., 2003: Peer polity interaction in the Hellenistic age, Past and present 180, 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carelli, P., 2001: En kapitalistisk anda. Kulturella förändringar i 1100–talets Danmark, Stockholm (Lund Studies in Medieval Archaeology 26).Google Scholar
Reckwitz, A., 2002: Towards a theory of social practices. A developement in cultural theorizing, European journal of social theory 5, 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T., 1996: Social practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M., 2012: The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratté, C., 2002: The urban development of Aphrodisias in the late Hellenistic and early imperial periods, in Berns, C., Hesberg, H. von, Vandeput, L. and Waelkens, M. (eds), Patris und Imperium, Leuven, 5–32.Google Scholar
Veyne, P., 1976: Le pain et le cirque. Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuiderhoek, A., 2009: The Politics of Munificence in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar