Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:35:04.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Mission impossible!’ Comment on Kristian Kristiansen, ‘Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2005

Extract

‘Theoretical archaeology’ as it exists today is – as we all know – primarily a product of anglophone archaeology. It developed as a challenge to traditional archaeological thinking in the 1960s under the label ‘New Archaeology’ and it flourished in the late 1970s and 1980s with the productive confrontation of ‘processual’ and ‘postprocessual’ approaches. In these ‘wonderful years’ theoretical archaeology gained reputation and influence far beyond its early centres. All over Europe and beyond mainly younger archaeologists found it useful and fascinating to join these debates (Hodder 1991).

Type
Discussion
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)