Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:40:55.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Haven't we dug enough now?’ Excavation in the light of intergenerational equity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Rick Bonnie
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In western Europe, cultural resource management agencies have enforced, through treaties and legislation, the principle that archaeological sites endangered by development are protected. Excavation has played – and still plays – a major role in this: thousands of archaeological sites that are threatened by destruction have been ‘rescued’ through excavations. While treaties (e.g. Malta 1992, 4.2) and legislations (e.g. Planning Policy Statement 5, A.13; Wet op de archeologische monumentenzorg, 2007) stipulate that rescue excavation stands equal to protection, they also acknowledge that there are better ways – like in situ preservation – to protect our heritage.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , June 2011 , pp. 48 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, S.E., and Cherry, J.F. (eds), 2004: Side-by-side survey. Comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean world, Oxford.Google Scholar
Algaze, G., Breuninger, R. and Knudstad, J., 1994: The Tigris–Euphrates Archaeological Reconnaissance Project. Final report of the Birecik and Carchemish Dam survey areas, Anatolica 20, 1–96.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F., 2005: Sublime historical experience, Stanford, CA and Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antkowiak, M., 2002: Ausgrabungen an Orten des Nationalsozialismus, Archäologie in Deutschland 5, 70–71.Google Scholar
Audouze, F., and Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1981: France. A continental insularity, World archaeology 13 (2), 170–89.Google Scholar
Bailey, G., and Galanidou, N., 2009: Caves, palimpsests and dwelling places. Examples from the Upper Palaeolithic of south-east Europe, World archaeology 41 (2), 215–41.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O., and Bordes, J.-G., 2010: Who were the makers of the Châtelperronian culture? Journal of human evolution 59 (5), 586–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Yosef, O., Vandermeersch, B., Arensburg, B., Belfer-Cohen, A., Goldberg, P., Laville, H., Meignen, L., Rak, Y., Speth, J.D., Tchernov, E., Tillier, A.-M. and Weiner, S., 1992: The excavations in Kebara Cave, Mt. Carmel, Current anthropology 33, 497–550.Google Scholar
Bazelmans, J., in press: Serving two masters. Dutch archaeology since the Valletta Convention, in Bradley, R., Haselgrove, C., Linden, M. Vander and Wesley, L. (eds), Developer-led archaeology in north-western Europe, Leicester.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R., 1997: Theorien in der Archäologie, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R., and McGuire, R.H. (eds), forthcoming 2011: Ideologies in archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1962: Archaeology as anthropology, American antiquity 28 (2), 217–25.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1964: A consideration of archaeological research design, American antiquity 29 (4), 425–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F., 1902: Rudolf Virchow's anthropological work, Science 16 (403), 441–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bölicke, U., Lüning, J. and Stehli, P. (eds), 1994: Die Bandkeramik im Merzbachtal auf der Aldenhovener Platte, Cologne (Rheinische Ausgrabungen 36).Google Scholar
Bonney, T.G., 1866: Stone circles and megalithic remains, Gentleman's magazine II, 307–18.Google Scholar
Briggs, C.S., 2007: Prehistory in the nineteenth century, in Pearce, S. (ed.), Visions of antiquity. The Society of Antiquaries of London 1707–2007, London, 227–65.Google Scholar
Brown, M.R.I., and Harris, E.C., 1993: Interfaces in archaeological stratigraphy, in Harris, E.C., Brown, M.R.I. and Brown, G.J. (eds), Practices of archaeological stratigraphy, London, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, P., 2003: Images as evidence in seventeenth-century Europe, Journal of the history of ideas 64 (2), 273–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, G., 2009: History and archaeology, the history of archaeology, and the archaeology of archaeology, in Baeriswyl, A., Descoeudres, G., Stercken, M. and Wild, D. (eds), Die mittelalterliche Stadt erforschen – Archäologie und Geschichte im Dialog, Basel, 43–52.Google Scholar
Carver, M.O.H., 1990: Digging for data. Archaeological approaches to data definition, acquisition and analysis, in Francovich, R. and Manacorda, D. (eds), Lo scavo archeologico. Dalla diagnosi all'edizione. III ciclo di lezioni sulla ricerca applicata in archeologia, Florence, 45–120.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A., 2003: Postprocessualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practice, Archaeological dialogues 10, 97–117.Google Scholar
Cherry, J.F., 2003: Archaeology beyond the site. Regional survey and its future, in Leventhal, R. and Papadopoulos, J. (eds), Theory and practice in Mediterranean archaeology. Old World and New World perspectives, Los Angeles, 137–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, J.F., Leppard, T.P., Murphy, E. and Ryzewski, K., forthcoming: Archaeology in the shadow of the volcano. Survey and landscape archaeology on Montserrat, submitted to Journal of island and coastal archaeology.Google Scholar
Cleere, H. (ed.), 1989: Archaeological heritage management in the modern world, London.Google Scholar
Collis, J., 2001: Digging up the past. An introduction to archaeological excavation, Stroud.Google Scholar
Conard, N., Grootes, P.M. and Smith, F.H., 2004: Unexpectedly recent dates for human remains from Vogelherd, Nature 430, 198–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conard, N.J., and Malina, M., 2007: Die Ausgrabung 2007 im Hohle Fels bei Schelklingen, Alb-Donau-Kreis, und neue Einblicke in die Anfänge des Jungpaläoloithikums, Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 2007, 17–20.Google Scholar
Crawford, O.G.S., 1932: The dialectical process in the history of science, Sociological review 24 (2), 165–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, O.G.S., 1960: Archaeology in the field, London.Google Scholar
Cresswell, T., 2002: Bourdieu's geographies. In memoriam, Environment and planning D. Society and space 20, 379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumberpatch, C.G., and Blinkhorn, P.W., 2001: Clients, contractors, curators and archaeology. Who owns the past? In Pluciennik, M. (ed.), The responsibilities of archaeologists, Oxford (BAR International Series 981), 39–46.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B., 1983: The publication of archaeological excavations. Report of the Joint Working Party of the Council for British Archaeology and the Department of the Environment, London.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., 2003: The seashell on the mountaintop. A story of science, sainthood, and the humble genius who discovered a new history of the earth, New York.Google Scholar
Daniel, G.E., 1975: A hundred and fifty years of archaeology, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Darwin, C., 1859: On the origin of species by means of natural selection or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R., 2004: The ancestor's tale. A pilgrimage to the dawn of life, London.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R., 2006: The selfish gene, Oxford.Google Scholar
Deetz, J., 1996: In small things forgotten. An archaeology of early American life, expanded and revised edn, New York.Google Scholar
De Grooth, M.E.T., and Stoepker, H., 1997: Archaeological finds in depots and museums. The end of the line or the beginning? In Willems, W.J.H., Kars, H. and Hallewas, D.P. (eds), Archaeological heritage management in the Netherlands, Amersfoort, 296–315.Google Scholar
De la Beche, H.T., 1835: How to observe. Geology, London.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., 2001: Pure immanence. Essays on a life, New York.Google Scholar
Demoule, J.-P., 2002: Rescue archaeology. The French way, Public archaeology 2, 170–77.Google Scholar
Demoule, J.-P., and Landes, Ch. (eds), 2009: La fabrique de l'archéologie en France, Paris.Google Scholar
D'Errico, F., Zilhão, J., Julien, M., Baffier, D. and Pelegrin, J., 1998: Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation, Current anthropology 39, 1–44.Google Scholar
Desbois, P., 2008: The Holocaust by bullets, London and New York.Google Scholar
Early, R., Crowther, C., Nardi, R., Önal, M., Abadie, C., Darmon, J.-P., Hartmann, M. and Speidel, M.A., 2003: Zeugma. Interim reports, Portsmouth, RI (Journal of Roman archaeology Supplementary Series 51).Google Scholar
Edgeworth, M., 2003: Acts of discovery. An ethnography of archaeological practice, Oxford (BAR International Series 1131).Google Scholar
Erfgoedinspectie, 2010: Zoek! Een speurtocht naar de rapporten van opgravingen 2003–2006, The Hague.Google Scholar
Fagan, B., 1995: Archaeology's dirty secret, Archaeology 48 (4), 14–17.Google Scholar
Fetten, F., 2000: Archaeology and anthropology in Germany before 1945, in Härke, H. (ed.), Archaeology, ideology and society. The German experience, Frankfurt am Main, 140–79.Google Scholar
Finlayson, C., 2009: The humans who went extinct. Why Neanderthals died out and we survived, Oxford.Google Scholar
Finlayson, C. et al. 2006: Late survival of Neanderthals at the southernmost extreme of Europe, Nature 443, 850–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamble, C., 2007: Origins and revolutions. Human identity in earliest prehistory, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemsege, P., 1754: Anglo-Saxon fragment, Gentleman's magazine, 282.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, B., 2006: Malta in de maak. Archeologisch management tijdens het Betuweproject, Amersfoort (Rapportage archeologische monumentenzorg 101).Google Scholar
Gould, S.J., 2000: Lyell's pillars of wisdom, in Gould, S.J. (ed.), The lying stones of Marrakech. Penultimate reflections in natural history, New York, 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grierson, P., 1959: Commerce in the Dark Ages. A critique of the evidence, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 5th series, 9, 13–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gründel, M., 2010: Tante JU aus Ringebu, Geocaching Magazin 1 (1), 62–73.Google Scholar
Hahn, J., Beck, H.-J. and Taute, W., 1985: Eiszeithöhlen im Lonetal. Archäologie einer Landschaft auf der Schwäbischen Alb, Stuttgart (Führer zu archäologischen Denkmälern in Baden-Württemberg 3).Google Scholar
Hayden, E.C., 2010: Life is complicated, Nature 464, 664–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1992: Symbolism, meaning and context, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Theory and practice in archaeology, London, 11–23.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1999: The archaeological process. An introduction, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., and Berggren, A., 2003: At the trowel's edge. An introduction to reflexive field practice in archaeology, Boulder.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., 2005: From Stonehenge to Las Vegas. Archaeology as popular culture, Walnut Creek and Oxford.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C., 2007. Archaeology is a brand. The meaning of archaeology in contemporary popular culture, Oxford.Google Scholar
Holtorf, C. and Ortman, O., 2008: Endangerment and conservation ethos in natural and cultural heritage. The case of zoos and archaeological sites, International journal of heritage studies 14, 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, D., Costanzo, M., Fey, P., Gojobori, T., Hannick, L., Hide, W., Hill, D.P., Kania, R., Schaeffer, M., Pierre, S. St, Twigger, S., White, O. and Rhee, S.Y., 2008: The future of biocuration, Nature 455 (7209), 47–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hublin, J.J., Spoor, F., Braun, M., Zonneveld, F. and Condemi, S., 1996: A late Neanderthal associated with Upper Palaeolithic artefacts, Nature 381, 224–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huizinga, J., 1936: A definition of the concept of history, in Klibansky, R. and Patton, H.J. (eds), Philosophy and history. Essays presented to Ernst Cassirer, Oxford, 1–10.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P.O., 1887 (1849): Moridunum, Gentleman's magazine (Romano-British remains. Part II) (I), 137–46.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 1993: The temporality of the landscape, World archaeology 25 (2), 152–74.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2000: The perception of the environment. Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill, London and New York.Google Scholar
Jones, S., MacSween, A., Jeffrey, S., Morris, R. and Heyworth, M., 2001: From the ground up. The publication of archaeological reports. A user needs survey, York, available at www.britarch.ac.uk/pubs/puns/ (accessed 24 October 2010).Google Scholar
Kemble, J.M., 1849: Introductory address, Archaeological journal 6, 1–3.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (ed.), 1998. The twin towns of Zeugma on the Euphrates. Rescue work and historical studies, Portsmouth, RI (Journal of Roman archaeology Supplementary Series 27).Google Scholar
Kletter, R., and De-Groot, A., 2001: Excavating to excess? Implications of the last decade of archaeology in Israel, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 14 (1), 76–109.Google Scholar
Kolen, J., 2009: The ‘anthropologization’ of archaeological heritage, Archaeological dialogues 16 (2), 209–25.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 2008: Do we need the ‘archaeology of Europe’? Archaeological dialogues 15, 5–25.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 2009, Contract archaeology in Europe. An experiment in diversity, World archaeology 41 (4), 641–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, C., 1998: Marxistische Perspektive in der gegenwärtigen englischsprachigen Archäologie, in Eggert, M.K.H. and Veit, U. (eds), Theorie in der Archäologie. Zur englischsprachigen Diskussion, Münster, 115–81.Google Scholar
Lemaire, T., 2002: Met open zinnen, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Lichardus-Itten, M., Demoule, J.-P., Perničeva, L., Grebska-Kulova, M. and Kulov, I., 2002: The site of Kovačevo and the beginnings of the Neolithic Period in Southwestern Bulgaria, the French–Bulgarian excavations 1986–2000, in Lichardus-Itten, M., Lichardus, J. and Nikolov, V. (eds), Beiträge zu jungsteinzeitlichen Forschungen in Bulgarien, Bonn (Saarbrücker Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 74), 99–158.Google Scholar
Logan, W., and Reeves, K. (eds), 2008: Places of pain and shame. Dealing with ‘difficult heritage’, London and New York.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H., 2005: Cultural geography. The busyness of being ‘more-than-representational’, Progress in human geography 29 (1), 83–94.Google Scholar
Lorimer, H., 2006: Herding memories of humans and animals, Environment and planning D. Society and space 24, 497–518.Google Scholar
Lubbock, J., 1865: Pre-historic times, as illustrated by ancient remains, and the manners and customs of modern savages, London.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 2001: Destruction and the rhetoric of excavation, Norwegian archaeological review 34, 35–46.Google Scholar
Lyell, C., 1990: Principles of geology. Facsimile of 1st ed. Vol. 1., Chicago.Google Scholar
Lyell, C., 1991: Principles of geology. Facsimile of 1st ed. Vol. 3, Chicago.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M., 2003: Living at the speed of light (1974), in McLuhan, S. and Staines, D. (eds), Understanding me. Lectures and interviews, Cambridge, MA, 226–43.Google Scholar
Mali, J., 2002: The rehabilitation of myth. Vico's ‘New science’, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mantell, G.A., 1844: The medals of creation; or, First lessons in geology, and in the study of organic remains. I: Fossil Vegetables, Infusoria, Zoophytes, Echinoderms, and Mollusca, London.Google Scholar
Marr, J.E., 1898: The principles of stratigraphical geology, Cambridge (Cambridge Natural Science Manuals. Geological Series).Google Scholar
Mellars, P., 1990: The emergence of modern humans, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Mellars, P., and Stringer, C., 1989: The human revolution, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M., 1962 (1945): Phenomenology of perception, London and New York.Google Scholar
Merriman, N., and Swain, H., 1999: Archaeological archives. Serving the public interest? European journal of archaeology 2, 249–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monton, B. (ed.), 2007: Images of empiricism. Essays on science and stances, with a reply from Bas van Fraassen, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachama, A. (ed.), 2008: Topographie des Terrors. Gestapo, SS und Reichssicherhauptamt in der Wilhelm- und Prinz-Albrecht-Strasse. Eine Dokumentation, Berlin.Google Scholar
Nilsson, B., and Rudebeck, E., 2010: Arkeologiska världar, in Nilsson, B. and Rudebeck, E. (eds), Arkeologiska och förhistoriska världar. Fält, erfarenheter och stenåldersplatser i sydvästra Skåne, Malmö (Malmöfynd 19).Google Scholar
Oebbecke, J., 1998: Private Unternehmen in der Bodendenkmalpflege. Die rechtswissenschaftliche Perspektive, Archäologische Informationen 21 (2), 215–23.Google Scholar
OED, 1997: New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pavlů, I., Zápotocká, M. and Soudský, O., 1983–87: Bylany Katalog. Výzkum 1953–1967, Prague (5 vols).Google Scholar
Pegge, S., 1789: Observations on some brass celts, and other weapons discovered in Ireland, 1780; by the Rev. Mr. Pegge. In a Letter to the Rev. Michael Lort, D.D.V.P.A.S., Archaeologia 9, 84–95.Google Scholar
Pétrequin, P. (ed.), 1997: Littoraux néolithiques de Clairvaux-les-Lacs et de Chalain (Jura) III, Chalain station 3, Paris (2 vols).Google Scholar
Petrie, W.M.F., 1904: Methods and aims in archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T.J., 1848: Introductory address, Transactions of the British Archaeological Association 1–15.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P.B., 1997: High resolution Neanderthals? Interpreting Middle Palaeolithic intrasite spatial patterning, World archaeology 29 (2), 208–24.Google Scholar
Pettitt, P.B., 2011: The Palaeolithic origins of human burial, London and New York.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1985: William Stukeley. An eighteenth-century antiquary, revised and enlarged edn, New York.Google Scholar
Quinton, A., 1980: Francis Bacon, Oxford.Google Scholar
Redman, C.L., 1973: Multistage fieldwork and analytical techniques, American antiquity 38 (1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, C.L., 1987: Surface collection, sampling, and research design. A retrospective, American antiquity 52 (2), 249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, C.L., 1999: The development of archaeological theory. Explaining the past, in Barker, G. (ed.), Companion encyclopedia of archaeology, Vol. 1, London, 48–80.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., and Bahn, P., 2000: Archaeology. Theories, methods and practice, 3rd edn, London.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., and Bahn, P., 2008: Archaeology. Theories, methods and practice, 5th edn, London.Google Scholar
Riek, G., 1934: Die Eiszeitjägerstation am Vogelherd im Lonetal, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Roebroeks, W., De Loecker, D., Hennekens, P. and van Ieperen, M., 1992: A ‘veil of stones’. On the interpretation of an early Middle Palaeolithic low density scatter at Maastricht-Belvédère (the Netherlands), Analecta Prehistorica Leidensia 25, 1–16.Google Scholar
Roemer, J.E., and Suzumura, K. (eds), 2007: Intergenerational equity and sustainability, London.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M.J.S., 1996: Geological travel and theoretical innovation. The role of ‘liminal’ experience, Social studies of science 26 (1), 143–59.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N., 2010: Manual and intellectual labour in archaeology. Past and present in human resource management, in Koerner, S. and Russell, I. (eds), Unquiet pasts. Risk society, lived cultural heritage, re-designing reflexivity, Farnham, 161–71.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N., and Aitchinson, K. (eds), 2010: Archaeology and the global economic crisis. Multiple impacts, possible solutions, Tervuren, available at www.ace-archaeology.eu/fichiers/25Archaeology-and-the-crisis.pdf (accessed 31 October 2010).Google Scholar
Schneer, C., 1954: The rise of historical geology in the seventeenth century, Isis 45 (3), 256–68.Google Scholar
Shanks, H. (ed.), 1996: Archaeology's publication problem, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., 1992: Experiencing the past. On the character of archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Shoup, D., 2006: Can archaeology build a dam? Sites and politics in Turkey's Southeast Anatolia Project, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 19 (2), 231–58.Google Scholar
Skeates, R., 2000: Debating the archaeological heritage, London.Google Scholar
Smith, W., 1816: Strata identified by organised fossils, containing prints on coloured paper of the most characteristic specimens in each stratum, London.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M., and Bintliff, J.L., 1988: Mediterranean survey and the city, Antiquity 62, 57–71.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M., and Bintliff, J.L., 1991: Surveying ancient cities, Scientific American 264 (3), 88–93.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A.M., and Cherry, J.F., 1988: On not digging up the past, Cambridge review 109 (2300), 9–13.Google Scholar
Sommer, U., 2009: Which crisis? Archaeological dialogues 16 (2), 171–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, W.W., 1948: A study of archaeology, New York (American Anthropologist 50(3), Part 2; Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association 69).Google Scholar
Thrift, N., 1999: Steps to an ecology of place, in Allen, J., Massey, D. and Sarre, P. (eds), Human geography today, Cambridge, 295–322.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1994: A phenomenology of landscape. Places, paths and monuments, Oxford.Google Scholar
Toebosch, T., 2006: Graven in het graf. Archeologen corrigeren herinneringen aan Nazi-tijd, NRC Handelsblad, 28–29 January 2006.Google Scholar
Tumarkin, , 2005: Traumascapes. The power and fate of places transformed by tragedy, Melbourne.Google Scholar
University College Dublin, 2006: Archaeology 2020. Repositioning Irish archaeology in the knowledge society. A realistically achievable perspective, Dublin, available at www.ucd.ie/t4cms/archaeology_2020.pdf (accessed 24 October 2010).Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B., 1980: The scientific image, Oxford.Google Scholar
Veit, U., 1998: Zwischen Tradition und Revolution. Theoretische Ansätze in der britischen Archäologie, in Eggert, M.K.H. and Veit, U. (eds), Theorie in der Archäologie. Zur englischsprachigen Diskussion, Münster, 15–65.Google Scholar
Verpoorte, A., 2001: Places of art, traces of fire. A contextual approach to anthropomorphic figurines in the Pavlovian (Central Europe, 29–24kyr BP), Leiden.Google Scholar
Vico, G., 2001: New science (principles of the new science concerning the common nature of nations; third edition, thoroughly corrected, revised, and expanded by the author), London.Google Scholar
Wagenaar, W.A., and Groeneweg, J., 1990: The memory of concentration camp survivors, Applied cognitive psychology 4, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkinson, C., 2008: To what extent do digital technologies solve ‘archaeology's publication problem’?, Center for the Study of Architecture newsletter 21 (2), available at www.csanet.org/newsletter/fall08/nlf0801.html (accessed 24 October 2010).Google Scholar
Way, A., 1844: Introduction, Archaeological journal 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
Weiner, J., 1991: The empty place. Poetry, space, and being among the Foi of Papua New Guinea, Bloomington and Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M., 1955: Still digging. Interleaves from an antiquary's notebook, London.Google Scholar
Willems, W.J.H., 2009: Archaeological resource management and academic archaeology in Europe. Some observations, in D'Agata, A.L. and Alaura, S. (eds), Quale futuro per l'archeologia? Workshop internazionale, Roma, 4–5 dicembre 2008, Rome, 89–99.Google Scholar
Williams, J., Sidel, J. and Painter, I., 2008: Piling and archaeology. An English Heritage guidance, Swindon.Google Scholar
Witmore, C.L., 2007: Symmetrical archaeology. Excerpts of a manifesto, World archaeology 39 (4), 546–62.Google Scholar
Woolley, L., 1931: Digging up the past, New York.Google Scholar
Woolley, L., 1961: Digging up the past, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, W., 1994: Roman antiquities discovered at Bishopstone, Herefordshire, in The collected poems of William Wordsworth, Ware, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987: Our common future, Oxford.Google Scholar
Zardaryan, M.H., Tonikyan, A.V., Alcock, S.E. and Cherry, J.F., 2007: Les investigations du project ‘Vorotan’ dans la région de Suynik, Les dossiers d'archéologie (Arménie des origines à la Christianisation) 321 (May–June 2007), 60–63.Google Scholar