Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-xc2pj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T14:36:11.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Sydney to Sarajevo

A centenary reflection on archaeology and European identity1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Tim Murray
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , May 1996 , pp. 56 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W.Y., 1991: Comment on Richard Watson (What the New Archaeology has accomplished), Current anthropology 32, 281.Google Scholar
Arnold, B., 1990: The past as propaganda. Totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany, Antiquity 64, 464–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, B., 1992: Introduction, in Attwood, B. and Arnold, J. (eds), Power, knowledge and Aborigines, Melbourne, i–xvi.Google Scholar
Baker, F., 1993: The Berlin Wall. Production, preservation and consumption of a 20th century monument, Antiquity 67, 709–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, G., 1989: Arguing with the past, Essays in narrative from Woolf to Sidney, London.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1933: Is prehistory practical?, Antiquity 7, 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1934: Anthropology and Herr Hitler, Discovery 15, 65–68.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C., 1993: Ambition, deference, discrepancy, consumption. The intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology, in Yoffee, N. and Sherratt, A. (eds), Archaeological theory. Who sets the agenda?, Cambridge, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, G., 1993: Distinguished lecture in archeology. Beyond criticising New Archeology, American anthropologist 95, 551–573.Google Scholar
Diaz-Andreu, M., 1993: Theory and ideology in archaeology. Spanish archaeology under the Franco regime, Antiquity 67, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietler, M., 1994: Our ancestors the Gauls. Archaeology, ethnic nationalism, and the manipulation of Celtic identity in modern Europe, American anthropologist 96, 584–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D., 1987: Uses of the past. Archaeology in the service of the state, American antiquity 52, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J., 1992a: Myth, history, and political identity, Cultural anthropology 7, 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J., 1992b: The past in the future. History and the politics of identity, American anthropologist 94, 837–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds), 1990: The politics of the past, London.Google Scholar
Gathercole, P., Irving, T. and Melleuish, G. (eds), 1995: Childe and Australia, St Lucia.Google Scholar
Gero, J., and Conkey, M. (eds), 1991: Engendering archaeology. Women and prehistory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harris, M., 1968: The rise of anthropological theory, New York.Google Scholar
Kohl, P., 1993: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology in Soviet Transcaucasia, Journal of European archaeology 1, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossinna, G., 1911: Die Herkunft der Germanen, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Llosa, M.V., 1993: Fiction: the power of lies, Melbourne.Google Scholar
McCann, B., 1988: The National Socialist perversion of archaeology, World archaeological bulletin 2, 51–54.Google Scholar
McDonald, K., 1994: Identity politics, Arena (june-july), 18–22.Google Scholar
McGuire, R., 1992: Archaeology and the first Americans, American anthropologist 94, 816–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManamon, F.P., 1991: The many publics for archaeology, American antiquity 56, 121–130.Google Scholar
Morgan, C., 1973: Archaeology and explanation, World archaeology 4, 259–276.Google Scholar
Murray, T., 1990: The history, philosophy and sociology of archaeology. The case of the Ancient Monuments Protection Act (1882), in Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds), Critical directions in contemporary archaeology, 55–67, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Murray, T., 1993: Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities. Who owns the past?, in Yoffee, N. and Sherratt, A. (eds), Archaeological theory. Who sets the agenda?, 105–116, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Murray, T., 1995a: Gordon Childe, archaeological records, and rethinking the archaeologist's project, in Gathercole, P., Irving, T. and Melleuish, G. (eds), Childe and Australia, St Lucia, 199–211.Google Scholar
Murray, T., 1995b: On Klejn's agenda for theoretical archaeology, Current anthropology 36, 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, T., 1996a: On coming to terms with the living. Some aspects of repatriation for the archaeologist, Antiquity 267, 217–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, T., 1996b: Towards a post-Mabo archaeology of Australia, in Attwood, B. (ed.), In the age of Mabo, Sydney, 73–87.Google Scholar
Paradis, J.G., and Postlethwait, T. (eds), 1985: Victorian science and Victorian values. Literary perspectives, New Brunswick (NJ).Google Scholar
Rowse, T., 1993: After Mabo. Interpreting indigenous traditions, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Said, E., 1985: Orientalism reconsidered, Race and class 27, 1–15.Google Scholar
Saitta, D., 1992: Radical archaeology and middle-range methodology, Antiquity 66, 886–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, H.M., 1982: Philosophy and archaeology, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M.B., 1988: The structure of archaeological theory, American Antiquity 53, 461–485.Google Scholar
Shennan, S., 1989: Introduction. Archaeological approaches to cultural identity, in Shennan, S. (ed.), Archaeological approaches to cultural identity, London, 1–32.Google Scholar
Slapsak, B., 1993: Archaeology and contemporary myths of the past, The journal of European archaeology 1, 191–195.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D., 1989: The ethnic origins of nations, Oxford.Google Scholar
Stocking, G.C., 1968: Race, culture, and evolution, New York.Google Scholar
Stocking, G.C., 1987: Victorian anthropology, New York.Google Scholar
Tomaskova, S., 1995: A site in history. Archaeology at Dolni Vestonice/Unterwisternitz, Antiquity 69, 301–316.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1991: Distinguished lecture in archeology. Constraint and freedom – a new synthesis for archaeological explanation, American anthropologist 93, 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, U., 1989: Ethnic concepts in German prehistory. A case study on the relationship between cultural identity and archaeological objectivity, in Shennan, S. (ed.), Archaeological approaches to cultural identity, London, 35–56.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J., and Fotiadis, M., 1990: The razor's edge. Symbolic-structural archeology and the expansion of archaeological inference, American anthropologist 92, 613–629.Google Scholar
Watson, R.A., 1991: What the New Archaeology has accomplished, Current anthropology 32, 275–291.Google Scholar
Wolf, E.R., 1982: Europe and the people without history, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wolf, E.R., 1994: Perilous ideas. Race, culture, people, Current anthropology 35, 1–12.Google Scholar
Wylie, A., 1989: Matters of fact and matters of interest, in Shennan, S. (ed.), Archaeological approaches to culture and identity, London, 94–109.Google Scholar
Wylie, A., 1992a: On scepticism, philosophy, and archaeological science, Current anthropology 33, 209–213.Google Scholar
Wylie, A., 1992b: The interplay of evidential constraints and political interests. Recent archaeological research on gender, American antiquity 57, 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar