Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T06:39:35.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fluid consistencies. Material relationality in human engagements with water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2014

Veronica Strang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Material things are not just passive recipients of human categories, meanings and values, nor mere subjects of human agency. Their particular characteristics and behaviours are formative of human–non-human relations. The common material properties of things, and the shared cognitive and phenomenological processes through which people interact with them, generate recurrent ideas and patterns of engagement in diverse cultural and historical contexts. Despite growing instrumentalism in human ‘management’ of the material world, and the emergence of new relational forms, these patterns persist.

Keywords

Human–environmental relationsmaterialityagencybioethics
Type
Discussion Article
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 133 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albro, R., 2005: ‘The water is ours, carajo!’ Deep citizenship in Bolivia's water war, in Nash, J. (ed.), Social movements. An anthropological reader, London, 249–68.Google Scholar
Allan, J.A., 2011: Virtual water. Tackling the threat to our planet's most precious resource, London.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A., 1986: The social life of things. Commodities in cultural perspective, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, K., and Bridge, G., 2006: Material worlds? Resource geographies and the ‘matter of nature’, Progress in human geography 30, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, B. (ed.), 1993: Landscape. Politics and perspectives, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bender, B., 1998: Stonehenge. Making space, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, J., 2009: Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Bennett, J., 2010: A vitalist stopover on the way to a new materialism, in Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds), New materialisms. Ontology, agency and politics, Durham, NC and London, 47–69.Google Scholar
Benyus, J., 1997: Biomimicry. Innovation inspired by nature, New York.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N., 1990: The giving environment. Another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters, Current anthropology 31 (2), 189–96.Google Scholar
Bird-David, N., 1999: ‘Animism’ revised. Personhood, environment, and relational epistemology’, Current anthropology 40 (supplement), 67–91.Google Scholar
Boivin, N., 2004: From veneration to exploitation. Human engagement with the mineral world, in Boivin, N. and Owoc, M. (eds), Soil, stones and symbols. Cultural perceptions of the mineral world, London, 1–30.Google Scholar
Boivin, N., 2008: Material cultures, material minds. The impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 2000: An archaeology of natural places, London.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R., 2010: The politics of ‘life itself’ and new ways of dying, in Coole, D. and Frost, S. (eds), New materialisms. Ontology, agency and politics, Durham, NC and London, 201–20.Google Scholar
Busse, M., and Strang, V., 2010: Introduction, in Strang, V. and Busse, M. (eds), Ownership and appropriation, Oxford and New York (ASA Monographs), 1–20.Google Scholar
Castree, N., and Head, L. (eds), 2008: Culture, nature and landscape in the Australian region, special issue, Geoforum 39 (3), special issue.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Macleod, J. and Neimanis, A. (eds), 2013: Thinking with water, Montreal.Google Scholar
Clark, A., 2008: Where brain, body and world collide, in C. Knappett and L. Malafouris (eds), Material agency. Towards a non-anthropocentric approach, New York, 1–18.Google Scholar
Clark, A., 2010: Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coole, D., and Frost, S. (eds), 2010: New materialisms. Ontology, agency and politics, Durham, NC and London.Google Scholar
Csordas, T. (ed.), 1994: Embodiment and experience. The existential ground of culture and self, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Daly, H., 1996: Beyond growth, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Damasio, A., 1999: The feeling of what happens. Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, New York.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1987 (1980): A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia, trans. B. Massumi, Minneapolis and London.Google Scholar
DeMarrais, E., Renfrew, C. and Gosden, C. (eds), 2004: Rethinking materiality. The engagement of mind with the material world, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Descola, P., and Palsson, G. (eds), 1996: Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives, London and New York.Google Scholar
Douglas, M., 1975: Implicit meanings. Essays in anthropology, London.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, M., 2011: Fluid pasts. Archaeology of flow, London.Google Scholar
Edwards, E., 2012: Objects of affect. Photography beyond the image, Annual review of anthropology 41, 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féaux de la Croix, J., 2011: Moving metaphors we live by. Water and flow in the social sciences and around hydroelectric dams in Kyrgyzstan, Central Asian survey 30 (3–4), 487–502.Google Scholar
Gell, A., 1992: The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology, in Coote, J. and Shelton, A. (eds), Anthropology, art and aesthetics, Oxford, 40–63.Google Scholar
Gell, A., 1998: Art and agency. An anthropological theory, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Georgescu Roegen, N., 1971: The entropy law and the economic process, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J., 1979: The ecological approach to visual perception, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., and Ingold, T. (eds), 1994: Tools, language and cognition in human evolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gingrich, A., 2012: Comparative methods in socio-cultural anthropology today, in R. Fardon, O. Harris, T. Marchand, M. Nuttall, C. Shore, V. Strang and R. Wilson (eds), The Sage handbook of social anthropology, London, 201–15.Google Scholar
Hansen, J., 2009: Storms of my grandchildren, New York.Google Scholar
Haraway, D., 2008: When species meet, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Harman, G., 2009: Prince of networks. Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne.Google Scholar
Harmansah, Ö., 2007: Source of the Tigris. Event, place and performance in the Assyrian landscapes of the Early Iron Age, Archaeological dialogues, 14 (2), 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D., 2010: The enigma of capital, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Harvey, P., 2012: Knowledge and experimental practice. A dialogue between anthropology and science and technology studies, in Fardon, R., Harris, O., Marchand, T., Nuttall, M., Shore, C., Strang, V. and Wilson, R. (eds), A handbook of social anthropology, London, 115–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, P., and Knox, H., 2010: Extraction, materiality and the ‘science of the concrete’ in engineering practice, in Bennett, T. and Joyce, P. (eds), Material powers. Cultural studies, history and the material turn, London, 124–41.Google Scholar
Hastrup, K., 2011: Waterworlds. Natural environmental disasters and social resilience in anthropological perspective, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G., 2006: The ethics of waste. How we relate to rubbish, Sydney.Google Scholar
Head, L., and Atchison, J., 2009: Cultural ecology. Emerging human–plant geographies, Progress in human geography 33, 236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G., 1979: The phenomenology of spirit, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henare, A., Holbraad, M. and Wastell, S., 2007: Thinking through things. Theorising artefacts ethnographically, London.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E., and O’Hanlon, M. (eds.), 1995: The anthropology of landscape. Perspectives on place and space, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 2012: Entangled. An archaeology of the relationships between humans and things, Oxford.Google Scholar
Howes, D. (ed.). 2005: Empire of the senses. A sensual culture reader, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Hudson, R., 2012: Critical political economy and material transformation, New political economy 17 (4). 373–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, C., and Sneath, D., 1999: The end of nomadism? Society, state and the environment in Inner Asia, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Illich, I., 1986: H2O and the waters of forgetfulness, London and New York.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2000: The perception of the environment, London and New York.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2007a: Earth, sky, wind, and weather, in Low, C. and Hsu, E. (eds), Wind, life, health. Anthropological and historical perspectives, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13 (supplement S1), S19–S38.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2007b: Materials against materiality, Archaeological dialogues 14 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2011a: Being alive. Essays on movement, knowledge and description, London.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2011b: Walking with dragons. An anthropological excursion on the wild side, Firth Lecture, ASA Conference, University of Wales, Trinity–St David, 15 September 2011.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., 2012: Towards an ecology of materials, Annual review of anthropology 41, 427–42.Google Scholar
Ingold, T., and Palsson, G. (eds), 2013: Biosocial becomings. Integrating social and biological anthropology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnson, M., 2012: Phenomenological approaches in landscape archaeology, Annual review of anthropology, 41, 269–84.Google Scholar
Keane, W., 2005: Signs are not the grab of meaning. On the social analysis of material things, in Miller, D. (ed.), Materiality, Durham, NC, 182–205.Google Scholar
Knappett, C., 2007: Materials with materiality?, Archaeological dialogues, 14 (1), 20–23.Google Scholar
Knappett, C., and Malafouris, L. (eds), 2008: Material agency. Towards a non-anthropocentric approach, New York.Google Scholar
Krause, F., and Strang, V. (eds), 2013: Living water. The powers and politics of a vital substance, Worldviews. Global religions, culture and ecology 17 (2), special issue.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980: Metaphors we live by, Chicago.Google Scholar
Latouche, S., 2004: Degrowth economics, Le monde diplomatique (English edition), November 2004, at http://mondediplo.com.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 2005: Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor Network Theory, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Law, J., 2002: Aircraft stories. Decentring the object in technoscience, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1966: The savage mind, Chicago.Google Scholar
Linton, J., 2010: What is water? The history of a modern abstraction, Vancouver and Toronto.Google Scholar
McMenamin, D., and McMenamin, M., 1994: Hypersea, New York.Google Scholar
Margulis, L., and McMenamin, M. (eds), 1992: Concepts of symbiogenesis. Historical and critical study of the research of Russian botanists, New Haven.Google Scholar
Meadows, D., Randers, J. and Meadows, D., 1972: The limits to growth, Club of Rome.Google Scholar
Meissner, S., 2012: Virtual water and water footprints. Global supply and production chains and their impacts on freshwater resources, in Hahn, P., Cless, K. and Soentgen, J. (eds), People at the well. Kinds, usages and meanings of water in a global perspective, Frankfurt and New York, 44–64.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M., 2003 (1962): Phenomenology of perception, London.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (ed.), 2005: Materiality. Politics, history and culture, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Miller, D., 2007: Stone Age or Plastic Age?, Archaeological dialogues, 14 (1), 23–27.Google Scholar
Mol, A., 2002: The body multiple. Ontology in medical practice, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Morphy, H., 1994a: Aesthetics is a cross-cultural category, in Weiner, J. (ed.), A debate held in the Muriel Stott Centre on 30th October, 1993, Manchester.Google Scholar
Morphy, H., 1994b: Ancestral connections. Art and an Aboriginal system of knowledge, Chicago.Google Scholar
Neimanis, A., 2013: Morning sickness and gut sociality. Towards a posthumanist feminist phenomenology, Janus head 13 (1), special issue, Feminist Phenomenology, 214–23.Google Scholar
Pels, P., 1998: The spirit of matter. On fetish, rarity, fact and fancy, in Spyer, P. (ed.). Border fetishism. Material objects in unstable spaces, London, 91–121.Google Scholar
Pillatt, T., 2012: From climate and society to weather and landscape, Archaeological dialogues 19 (1), 29–42.Google Scholar
Pinney, C., and Thomas, N., 2001: Beyond aesthetics. Art and the technologies of enchantment, Oxford.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K., 1957: The great transformation, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Reisner, M., 2001 (1986): Cadillac desert. The American West and its disappearing water, London.Google Scholar
Richards, C., 1996: Henges and water. Towards an elemental understanding of monumentality and the landscape in late Neolithic Britain, Journal of material culture 1 (3), 313–36.Google Scholar
Rival, L. (ed.), 1998: The social life of trees. Anthropological perspectives on tree symbolism, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N. (ed.), 2009: Techniques, technology and civilization. Marcel Mauss, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E., 1973: Small is beautiful, New York.Google Scholar
Serpell, J., 1996: In the company of animals. A study of human–animal relationships, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Shields, R., 1997: Flow as a new paradigm, Space and Culture 1 (1), 1–7.Google Scholar
Smith, J., 2014: Water as a medieval intellectual entity. Case studies in twelfth century Western monasticism, Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B., 2001 (1677): Ethics, Ware.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 1997: Uncommon ground. Cultural landscapes and environmental values, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2002: Life down under. Water and identity in an Aboriginal cultural landscape, London (Goldsmiths College Anthropology Research Papers 7).Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2004: The meaning of water, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2005a: Common senses. Water, sensory experience and the generation of meaning, Journal of material culture 10 (1), 93–121.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2005b: Knowing me, knowing you. Aboriginal and Euro-Australian concepts of nature as self and other, Worldviews. Global religions, culture, and ecology 9 (1), 25–56.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2006: Turning water into wine, beef and vegetables. Material transformations along the Brisbane River, Transforming cultures 1 (2), 9–19, at http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/TfC.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2009: Gardening the world. Agency, identity, and the ownership of water, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2010: Fluid forms. Owning water in Australia, in Strang, V. and Busse, M. (eds), Ownership and appropriation, Oxford and New York, 171–95.Google Scholar
Strang, V., 2013: ‘Dam nation. Cubbie Station and the waters of the Darling’, in Wagner, J. (ed.), The social life of water in a time of crisis, Oxford and New York, 36–60.Google Scholar
Strang, V., in press. Justice for all. Inconvenient truths and reconciliation in human–non-human relations, in Kopnina, H. and Shoreman-Ouimet, E. (eds), Routledge international handbook of environmental anthropology, New York and London.Google Scholar
Strang, V., and Garner, A. (eds), 2006: Fluidscapes. Water, identity and the senses, Special issue, Worldviews. Global religions, culture, and ecology 10 (2), special issue.Google Scholar
Strathern, M., 1996: Cutting the network, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2 (3), 517–35.Google Scholar
Taçon, P., 1991: The power of stone. Symbolic aspects of stone use and tool development in western Arnhem Land, Australia, Antiquity 65, 192–207.Google Scholar
Taçon, P., 2004: Ochre, clay, stone and art. The symbolic importance of minerals as life-force among Aboriginal peoples of northern and central Australia, in Boivin, N. and Owoc, M. (eds), Soil, stones and symbols. Cultural perceptions of the mineral world, London, 31–42.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 2007: Materiality in materials, Archaeological dialogues 14 (1), 16–20.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 2010: Interpreting landscapes. Geologies, topographies, identities, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., and Bennett, W., 2004: The materiality of stone. Explorations in landscape phenomenology, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M. and Spyer, P. (eds), 2006: Handbook of material culture, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi.Google Scholar
Tsing, A., 2004: Friction. An ethnography of global connections, Princeton.Google Scholar
Verdery, K., and Humphrey, C., 2004: Property in question. Value transformation in the global economy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vernadsky, V., 1986: The biosphere, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar