Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:52:34.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dutch perspectives on contemporary archaeology

An editorial statement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1994

References

Barker, G., 1985: Landscape archaeology in Italy, in Malone, C. and Stoddart, S. (eds), Papers in Italian Archaeology IV. Part I: the human landscape, Oxford (British Archaeological Reports. International Series 243), 119.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1968: Archaeological perspectives, in Binford, L.(ed.) 1972, An archaeological perspective, New York, 78104.Google Scholar
Champion, T., 1991: Theoretical archaeology in Britain, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London, 129160.Google Scholar
Cleuziou, S., Coudart, A., Demoule, J.-P. and Schnapp, A., 1991: The use of theory in French archaeology, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London, 91128.Google Scholar
Diaz-Andreu, M., 1993: Theory and ideology in archaeology. Spanish archaeology under the Franco régime, Antiquity 67, 7482.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., 1992: The past in the future: history and the politics of identity, American Anthropologist 94, 837859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giardina, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds), 1981: Società romana e produzione schiavista, Rome.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1991a: Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1991b: Archaeological theory in contemporary European societies: the emergence of competing traditions, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London, 124.Google Scholar
Hodges, R., 1990: Glyn Daniel, the Great Divide and the British contribution to Italian archaeology, The Accordia research papers 1, 8393.Google Scholar
Miraj, L. and Zeqo, M., 1993: Conceptual changes in Albanian archaeology, Antiquity 67, 123125.Google Scholar
Myhre, B., 1991: Theory in Scandinavian archaeology since 1960: a view from Norway, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London, 161186.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1980: The Great Tradition versus the Great Divide: archaeology as anthropology?, American Journal of Archaeology 84, 287298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roymans, N. and Theuws, F. (eds), 1990: The Pionier project ‘Power and Elite’: an introduction, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., 1987: Social theory and archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. and Glover, I. (eds), 1981: Regional traditions of archaeological research, World Archaeology 13, 133–393.Google Scholar
Vašiček, J. and Malina, Z., 1990: Archaeology yesterday and today. The development of archaeology in the sciences and humanities, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Veit, U., 1992: The colours of European theory, Antiquity 66, 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, W.J.H., 1986: Romans and Batavians. A regional study in the Dutch Eastern River Area, Amersfoort.Google Scholar