Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:20:01.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Different perceptions of organizing life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

John C. Barrett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The transformation between the two landscapes of Cranborne Chase, the earlier characterized by ritual and ceremonial monuments the later by an agricultural landscape, encapsulates the most significant transformation in the later prehistory of Britain. Indeed, the emergence of intensive agricultural practices which employ a wider range of crops, achieve increasing levels of crop purity, enclose and manage the land according to new patterns of territoriality, and establish long-lived nucleated settlements, is a more general feature of the European Bronze Age. It was upon this foundation that the agricultural practices of the Iron Age were embedded.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 49 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashbee, P., 1976: Amesbury Barrow 51. Excavation, 1970, Wiltshire archaeological magazine 70 / 71, 1–60.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1989: Food, gender and metal. Questions of social reproduction, in Sørensen, M.L.S. and Thomas, R. (eds), The Bronze Age – Iron Age transition in Europe. Aspects of continuity and change in European societies c. 1200 to 500 BC, Oxford, 304–320.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1994: Fragments from antiquity, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., Bradley, R. and Green, M., 1991: Landscape, monuments and society. The prehistory of Cranborne Chase, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., in press: The significance of monuments, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J., 1995: A place for the dead. The role of human remains in late bronze age Britain, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstow, G., 1958: A late bronze age urnfield on Steyning Round Hill, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 24, 158–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstow, G. and Holleyman, G., 1957: Late bronze age settlement on Itford Hill, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 23, 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewett, P., 1982: Later bronze age downland economy and excavations at Blackpatch, East Sussex, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 48, 321–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, M., 1994: Down Farm, Current archaeology 138, 216–225.Google Scholar
Holden, E.W., 1972: A Bronze Age cemetery-barrow on Itford Hill, Beddingham, Sussex, Sussex archaeological collections 110, 70–117.Google Scholar
Parker, Pearson M., 1996: Food, fertility and front doors in the first millennium BC, in Champion, T. and Collis, J. (eds), The Iron Age in Britain and Ireland. Recent trends, Sheffield, 117–132.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe-Densham, H.B.A., and Ratcliffe-Densham, M.M., 1961: An anomalous earthwork of the Late Bronze Age on Cock Hill, Sussex, Sussex archaeological collections 99, 78–101.Google Scholar
Willey, G. (ed), 1974: Archaeological researches in retrospect, Cambridge (Mass).Google Scholar