Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:24:19.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can archaeologists intervene in public debate on urgent questions of a social, cultural or political nature? A reflection on the Israeli–Palestinian Archaeology Working Group (IPAWG)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2013

Ghattas Jeries Sayej
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The archaeologist's role in public life is not limited to only understanding, reflecting and informing on the past, but also should reveal who we are at present and help society in manoeuvring into the future. We are a major part of the public intellectuals who should intervene in public debate, not only in the media but also as a part of the decision-making process. We can contribute to making a difference in many aspects of human life, intellectually, socially, culturally and politically. This paper will aim to shed light on my involvement in the Israeli–Palestinian Archaeology Working Group (IPAWG). I will focus on how a small group of archaeologists has contributed positively to one of the most complicated political conflicts in modern history. I will also address an example from Al-Jib to indicate the role of archaeologists as scientists, citizens and public figures.

Keywords

public intellectualdebatepolitical conflictIsraeli–Palestinian archaeologyAl-Jib (Gibeon)
Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , June 2013 , pp. 47 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J., 1998: The impact of Rome on the periphery. The case of Palestina – Roman period (63 BCE–324 CE), in Levy, T. (ed.), The archaeology of society in the Holy Land, London, 446–69.Google Scholar
Bar-Yosef, O., and Mazar, A., 1982: Israeli archaeology, World archaeology 13 (3), 310–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elon, A., 1997: Politics and archaeology, in Silberman, N. and Small, D. (eds), The archaeology of Israel. Constructing the past, interpreting the present, Sheffield (Journal for the study of the Old Testament, Supplement Series 237).Google Scholar
Greenberg, R., and Keinan, A., 2009: Israeli archaeological activity in the West Bank 1967–2007. A sourcebook, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Pritchard, J., 1962: Gibeon, where the sun stood still, Princeton.Google Scholar
Ramos, M., and Duganne, D., 2000: Exploring public perceptions and attitudes about archaeology. Report from the SAA, available at www.saa.org/pubedu/nrptdraft4.pdf.Google Scholar
Sayej, G.J., 2010: Palestinian archaeology. Knowledge, awareness and cultural heritage, Present past 2 (1), 58–71.Google Scholar
Silberman, N., 1989: Between past and present. Archaeology, ideology and nationalism in the modern Middle East, New York.Google Scholar
Silberman, N., 1995: Promised lands and chosen people. The politics and poetics of archaeological narrative, inKohl, Philip L. (ed.), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge, 249–62.Google Scholar
Silberman, N., 1998: Power, politics and the past. The social construction of antiquity in the Holy Land, in Levy, T. (ed.), The archaeology of society in the Holy Land, London, 9–23.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1984: Alternative archaeologies. Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man 19, 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B., 1986: Prospects for a world archaeology, World archaeology 18 (1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B., 1995: Romanticism, nationalism, and archaeology, in Kohl, Philip L. (ed.), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge, 263–79.Google Scholar
Tveit, O.K., 2005: Krig og diplomati. Oslo–Jerusalem 1978–1996, Oslo.Google Scholar
Yahya, A., 2005: Archaeology and nationalism in the Holy Land, in Pollock, S. and Bernbeck, R. (eds), Archaeologies of the Middle East. Critical prospective, 66–77.Google Scholar