Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:43:28.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond externalism. Exploring new directions in the history of archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2010

Oscar Moro Abadía
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years archaeologists have celebrated the emergence of a critical history of archaeology which has assumed a central position in disciplinary debates. This new historiography has been characterized by the adoption of an externalist or contextual approach primarily concerned with how social, economic and political conditions have influenced the interpretation of archaeological data. While externalism has played an essential role in the recognition of the history of archaeology as a field, I suggest in this article that it is time for historians to explore new ways of conceptualizing the social dimensions of archaeological knowledge. In particular, I consider how certain debates held by historians and sociologists of science during the last years can encourage historians of archaeology to enquire more critically about the blurry boundaries between ‘archaeology’ and its ‘context’.

Keywords

history of archaeologyexternalisminternalismsociology of sciencehistory of science
Type
Note
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 2010 , pp. 215 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, J.,Banks, I. and O'Sullivan, J. (eds), 1996: Nationalism and archaeology. Scottish Archaeological Forum, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Asad, T., 1973: Anthropology and the colonial encounter, London.Google Scholar
Bahn, P.G. (ed.), 1996: The Cambridge illustrated history of archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, B.,1974: Scientific knowledge and sociological theory, London.Google Scholar
Barnes, B., 2005: Transcending the discourse of social influences, in Machamer, P. and Wolters, G. (eds), Science, values and objectivity, Pittsburgh, 90–111.Google Scholar
Bijker, W.E.,Hughes, T.P. and Pinch, T.J. (eds), 1987: The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bloor, D., 1976: Knowledge and social imagery, London.Google Scholar
Boule, M., 1923: Les Hommes fossiles. Eléments de paléontologie humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1975: La Spécifité du champ scientifique et les conditions sociales du progress de la raison, Sociologie et sociétés 7 (1), 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 2001: Science of science and reflexivity, Chicago, 2004.Google Scholar
Bowler, P., 1989: The invention of progress. The Victorians and the past, Oxford.Google Scholar
Callon, M. and Law, J. 1989: On the construction of socio-technical networks. Content and context revisited, Knowledge and society 9, 57–83.Google Scholar
Capitan, L., 1899: Cours d'anthropologie prehistorique. La Science prehistorique, ses méthodes, Revue de l'Ecole d'anthropologie de Paris 9, 333–49.Google Scholar
Cartailhac, E., 1889: La France préhistorique d'après les sépultures et les monuments, Paris.Google Scholar
Chadha, A., 2002: Visions of discipline. Sir Mortimer Wheeler and the archaeological method in India (1944–1948), Journal of social archaeology 2, 378–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, A., 2003: Post-processualism, professionalization, and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practice, Archaeological dialogues 10 (1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamber, D.W. and Turnbull, D. 1989: Science worlds. An integrated approach to social studies of science teaching, Social studies of science 19 (1), 155–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champion, T., 1996: Three nations or one? Britain and the national use of the past, in Díaz-Andreu, M. and Champion, T. (eds), Nationalism and archaeology in Europe, 119–45.Google Scholar
Coye, N., 1997: La Préhistoire en parole et en acte. Méthodes et enjeux de la pratique archéologique (1830–1950), Paris.Google Scholar
Coye, N. (ed.), 2006: Sur les Chemins de la préhistoire. L'Abbé Breuil, du Périgord à l'Afrique du Sud, Paris.Google Scholar
Crawford, E., 1992: Nationalism and internationalism in science, 1880–1939. Four studies of the Nobel population, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, E.,Shinn, T. and Soerlin, S. (eds), 1993: Denationalizing science. The contexts of international scientific practice, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croissant, J.L., 2000: Narrating archaeology. A historiography and notes toward a sociology of archaeological knowledge, in Nash, S. (ed.), It's about time. A history of archaeological dating in North America, Salt Lake City, 186–206.Google Scholar
Christeson, A.L., 1989: Tracing archaeology's past. The historiography of archaeology, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Daniel, G., 1981a: A short history of archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Daniel, G., 1981b: Introduction. The necessity for an historical approach to archaeology, in Daniel, G. (ed.), Towards a history of archaeology. Being the papers read at the first Conference in the History of Archaeology in Aarhus, 29 August–2 September 1978, London, 9–13.Google Scholar
Debus, A.G. 1987: Chemistry, alchemy and the new philosophy, 1550–1700. Studies in the history of science and medicine, London.Google Scholar
Defrance-Jublot, F., 2005: Question laïque et légitimité scientifique en préhistoire. La revue L'Anthropologie (1890–1910), Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire 87, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M., 2007a: A world history of archaeology at the nineteenth century, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M., 2007b: Internationalism in the invisible college. Political ideologies and friendships in archaeology, Journal of social archaeology 7 (1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M. and Champion, T. (eds), 1996: Nationalism and archaeology in Europe, London.Google Scholar
Díaz-Andreu, M. and Sørensen, M.L. (eds), 1998: Excavating women. A history of women in European archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J.E. (eds), 2000: Agency in archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Dolwick, J.S. 2009: ‘The social’ and beyond. Introducing actor-network theory, Journal of maritime archaeology 4, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornan, J.L. 2002: Agency and archaeology. Past, present and future directions, Journal of archaeological method and theory 9 (4), 303–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, M.E., 1872: L'Homme pendant les âges de la pierre dans les environs de Dinant-sur-Meuse, Brussels.Google Scholar
Eickhoff, M., 2005: German archaeology and National Socialism. Some historiographical remarks, Archaeological dialogues 12 (1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J., 1870: An address delivered in the Department of Ethnology and Anthropology, Liverpool (15 September 1870), London (British Association for the Advancement of Science).Google Scholar
Falconer, H., 1864: Primeval man and his contemporaries, in Murchinson, C. (ed.), 1868. Palaentological memoirs and notes of the late Hugh Falconer. Vol II. Mastodon, elephant, rhinoceros, ossiferous caves, primeval man and his contemporaries, London, 570–600.Google Scholar
Forman, P., 1971: Weimar culture, causality, and quantum theory, 1918–1927. Adaptation by German physicists and mathematicians to a hostile intellectual environment, Historical studies in the physical sciences 3, 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frickel, S. and Moore, K. (eds), 2006: The new political sociology of science. Institutions, networks, and power, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Galaty, M.L. and Watkinson, C. 2004: Archaeology under dictatorship. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galison, P., 2008: Ten problems in history and philosophy of science, Isis 99, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellner, E., 1983: Nations and nationalism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gero, J., 1985: Socio-politics of archaeology and the woman-at-home ideology, American antiquity 50 (2), 342–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooding, T.,Pinch, T. and Schaffer, S. (eds), 1989: The uses of experiment. Studies in the natural sciences, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hager, L.D., 1997: Women in human evolution, London and New York.Google Scholar
Halle, U., 2005: Archaeology in the Third Reich. Academic scholarship and the rise of the ‘lunatic fringe’, Archaeological dialogues 12 (1), 91–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilakis, Y. and Yalouri, E., 1999: Sacralising the past. Cults of archaeology in modern Greece, Archaeological dialogues 6, 115–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamy, E.-T., 1870: Précis de paléontologie humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Härke, H., (ed.), 2000: Archaeology, ideology and society. The German experience, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J., 1990: Nations and nationalism since 1780. Programme, myth, reality, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E.J. and Ranger, T., 1983: The invention of tradition, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1999: The archaeological process. An introduction, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 2000: Towards reflexive method in archaeology. The example at Çatalhöyük, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Horning, A.J., 2006: Archaeology, conflict and contemporary identity in the north of Ireland. Implications for theory and practice in comparative archaeologies of colonialism, Archaeological dialogues 13 (2), 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurel, A., 2007: La France préhistorienne de 1789 à 1941, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, S.R., 2006: Self-citation in archaeology. Age, gender, prestige and the self, Journal of archaeological method and theory 13 (1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M., 2000: Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation, in Thomas, J. (ed.), Interpretative archaeology. A reader, London, 211–27.Google Scholar
Johnston, R., 1976: Contextual knowledge. A model for the overthrow of the internal/external dichotomy in science, Journal of sociology 12, 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeser, M.-A., 2002: On the international roots of prehistory, Antiquity 76, 170–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaeser, M.-A. 2008: Biography as microhistory. The relevance of private archives for writing the history of archaeology, in Schlanger, N. and Nordbladh, J. (eds), Archives, ancestors, practices. Archaeology in the light of its history, Oxford, 9–20.Google Scholar
Kehoe, A.B., 1998: The land of prehistory. A critical history of American archaeology, London and New York.Google Scholar
Kehoe, A.B. and Emmerichs, M.B. (eds), 1999: Assembling the past. Studies in the professionalization of archaeology, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Klindt-Jensen, O., 1975: A history of Scandinavian archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Kline, R., 1995: Construing ‘technology’ as ‘applied science’. Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880–1945, Isis 86 (2), 194–221.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K., 1999: Epistemic cultures. How the sciences make knowledge, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, P.L., 1998: Nationalism and archaeology. On the constructions of nations and the reconstructions of the remote past, Annual review of anthropology 27, 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. (eds), 1995: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kohl, P.L.,Kozelsky, M. and Ben-Yehuda, N. (eds), 2007: Selective remembrances. Archaeology in the construction, commemoration, and consecration of national past, Chicago.Google Scholar
Koyré, A., 1961: La Révolution astronomique. Copernic, Kepler, Borelli, Paris.Google Scholar
Koyré, A., 1966: Etudes d'histoire de la pensée scientifique, Paris.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1981: A social history of Danish archaeology (1805–1975), in Daniel, G., Towards a history of archaeology, London, 20–44.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T., 1962: The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T., 1977 (1968): The history of science, in Kuhn, T., The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and changes, Chicago, 105–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A., 1988: The invention of primitive society. Transformations of an illusion, London.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1987: Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1999: Pandora's hope. Essays on the reality of science studies, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2005: Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1979: Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts, London.Google Scholar
Law, J., 2004: After method. Mess in social science research, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds), 1999: Actor network theory and after, Oxford.Google Scholar
Losemann, V., 1977: Nationalsozialismus und Antique. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Lyons, C.L. and Papadopolus, J.K. (eds), 2002: The archaeology of colonialism, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Merton, R.K., 1973 (1942): The normative structure of science, in Merton, R.K., The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations, Chicago and London, 267–78.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. (ed.), 1998: Archaeology under fire. Nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro Abadía, O., 2006a: Art, crafts and Paleolithic art, Journal of social archaeology 6 (1), 119–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro Abadía, O., 2006b: L'a priori du progrès chez Breuil et Leroi-Gourhan. Une continuité masque, Les Nouvelles de l'archéologie, 106, 29–33.Google Scholar
Moro Abadía, O., 2007: Arqueología Prehistórica e historia de la ciencia (Preface by Bruce G. Trigger), Barcelona.Google Scholar
Moro Abadía, O. and Morales, M.R. González, 2004: Towards a genealogy of the concept of ‘Paleolithic mobiliary art’, Journal of anthropological research 60, 321–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortillet, G., 1883: Le Préhistorique. Antiquité de l'homme, Paris.Google Scholar
Moser, S., 1998: Ancestral images. The iconography of human origins, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Moser, S., 2001: Archaeological representation. The visual conventions for constructing knowledge about the past, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory today. Cambridge, 262–83.Google Scholar
Müller-Scheessel, N., 2001: Fair prehistory. Archaeological exhibits at French Expositions universelles, Antiquity 75, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, T. (ed.), 1999: Encyclopedia of archaeology. The great archaeologists. 2 vols., Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Murray, T. (ed.), 2001: Encyclopedia of archaeology. History and discoveries. 3 vols., Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Murray, T. and White, J. Peter 1981: Cambridge in the bush? Archaeology in Australia and New Guinea, World archaeology 13 (2), 255–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, A., 2007: Finding time for the Old Stone Age. A history of Palaeolithic archaeology and Quaternary geology in Britain, 1860–1960, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B., 2007: Keeping things at arm's length. A genealogy of asymmetry, World archaeology 39 (4), 579–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, J., 2006: Collecting artefacts, acquiring empire, Journal of the history of collections 18 (1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, T.C., 1986: The last sixty years. Towards a social history of American archaeology in the United States, American anthropologist 88 (1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, T. C., 1995: Toward a social history of archaeology in the United States, Fort Worth.Google Scholar
Pinsky, V., 1989: Introduction. Historical foundations, in Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology. Essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology, Cambridge, 51–54.Google Scholar
Porter, R., 1990: The history of science and the history of society, in Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R. and Hodge, M.J.S. (eds), Companion to the history of modern science, London and New York, 32–46.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., 1995: L'Internationale scientifique (1890–1914), thèse de doctorat, Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, Paris.Google Scholar
Robertshaw, P. (ed.), 1990: A history of African archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Richard, N., 2008: Inventer la préhistoire. Les Débuts de l'archéologie préhistorique en France, Paris.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P., 2007: From Genesis to Prehistory. The archaeological Three Age System and its contested reception in Denmark, Britain and Ireland, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, R., 1985: Funding science. The real defect of peer review and an alternative to it, Science, technology and human values 10 (3), 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C., 1984: Whigs and professionals, Nature 308, 777–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E.W., 1978: Orientalism. Western representation of the Orient, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Schlanger, N., 2002: Ancestral archives. Explorations in the history of archaeology, Antiquity 76, 127–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlanger, N., 2003: The Burkitt affair revisited. Colonial implications and identity politics in early South African prehistoric research, Archaeological dialogues 10, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlanger, N., 2004: The past is in the present. On the history and archives of archaeology, Modernism 11, 165–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlanger, N. and Nordbladh, J. 2008: Archaeology in the light of its histories, in Schlanger, N. and Nordbladh, J. (eds), Archives, ancestors, practices. Archaeology in the light of its history, Oxford, 1–5.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A., 1977: Per una discussione sul calssicismo nell'età dell'imperialismo. Archéologie et nazisme, Quaderni di Storia 5, 1–26.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1993: La Conquête du passé. Aux Origines de l'archéologie, Paris.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1996: French archaeology. Between national identity and cultural identity, in Díaz-Andreu, M. and Champion, T. (eds), Nationalism and archaeology in Europe, London, 48–67.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A., 2002: Between antiquarians and archaeologists. Continuities and ruptures, Antiquity 76, 134–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder-Gudehus, B., 1978: Les Scientifiques et la paix. La Communauté scientifique internationale pendant les années vingt, Montreal.Google Scholar
Schuster, J.A., 1990: The Scientific Revolution, in Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R. and Hodge, M.J.S. (eds), Companion to the history of modern science, London and New York, 217–42.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., 2007: Symmetrical archaeology, World archaeology 39 (4), 589–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S., 1982: History of science and its sociological reconstructions, History of science 10, 157–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S., 1992: Discipline and bounding. The history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism–internalism debate, History of Science 30, 333–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. 1985: Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle and the experimental life, Princeton.Google Scholar
Shepherd, N., 2002: The politics of archaeology in Africa, Annual review of anthropology 31, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberman, N.A., 1989: Between past and present. Archaeology, ideology and nationalism in the modern Middle East, New York.Google Scholar
Silberman, N.A., 1999: From sacralising to sacrilege? Possible alternative relationships of religion, nationalism, and archaeology, Archaeological dialogues 6, 139–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skolnikoff, E.B., 1993: The elusive transformation. Science, technology, and the evolution of international politics, Princeton.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D., 1986: The ethnic origins of nations, Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D., 1983: State and nation in the Third World. The Western state and African nationalism, Brighton.Google Scholar
Sommer, U., 2000: Theory and tradition in German archaeology, Archaeological dialogues 7 (2), 160–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomášková, S., 2006: Yes, Virginia, there is gender. Archaeology's many histories, in Bisson, M. and Williamson, R. (eds), The archaeology of Bruce Trigger. Theoretical empiricism, Montreal, 81–113.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1980: Archaeology of the image of American Indian, American antiquity 45 (4), 662–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1984: Alternative archaeologies. Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist, Man, 19 (3), 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1994: The coming of age of the history of archaeology, Journal of archaeological reseach 2 (1), 113–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1995: Romanticism, nationalism, and archaeology, in Kohl, P.L. and Fawcett, C. (eds), Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology, Cambridge, 263–79.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 2001: Historiography, in Murray, T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of archaeology. History and discoveries. Volume II, Santa Bárbara, 630–39.Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 2006: A history of archaeological thought. 2nd edn, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Reybrouck, D., 2002: Boule's error. On the social context of scientific knowledge, Antiquity 76, 158–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vialet, A. and Hurel, A. 2004: Teilhard de Chardin en Chine correspondance inédite (1923–1940), Paris.Google Scholar
Wang, J., 1995: Liberals, the progressive left, and the political economy of postwar American science. The National Science Foundation debate revisited, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences 26 (1), 139–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webmoor, T. 2007: What about ‘one more turn after the social’ in archaeological reasoning? Taking things seriously, World archaeology 39 (4), 563–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitridge, P. 2004: Landscapes, houses, bodies, things. ‘Place’ and the archaeology of Inuit imaginaries, Journal of archaeological method and theory 11 (2), 213–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, C.L., 2007: Symmetrical archaeology. Excerpts of a manifesto, World archaeology 39 (4), 546–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarrow, T., 2003: Artefactual persons. The relational capacities of persons and things in the practice of excavation, Norwegian archaeological review 36 (1), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarrow, T., 2008: In context. Meaning, materiality and agency in the process of archaeological recording, in Knappett, C. and Malafouris, L. (eds.), Material agency. Towards a non-anthropocentric approach, New York, 1–17.Google Scholar
Yates, F.A., 1964: Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic tradition, London.Google Scholar