Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:39:52.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeologies of risk and wonder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2016

Benjamin Alberti
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this statement, I argue that one way for archaeology to realize the potential of its materials to tell us something different about the past is to confront the question of alterity, understood as the ontological difference that lies at the roots of much archaeological material. If we accept alterity as a starting point of analysis then we stand a chance of challenging the strictures of interpretive frameworks that foreclose the possibility of encountering something new. Methodologically and theoretically I argue for risk-taking, especially taking on conceptual resources from indigenous thinkers and adopting a stance of wonder in the face of our materials which can open up unsuspected archaeological realities.

Keywords

perspectivismindigenous theoryDavi Kopenawawonderalterity
Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , December 2016 , pp. 138 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, B., 2014a: Archaeology, risk, and the alter-politics of materiality, Fieldsights. Theorizing the contemporary. Cultural anthropology online, 13 January 2014, at http://culanth.org/fieldsights/476-archaeology-risk-and-the-alter-politics-of-materiality.Google Scholar
Alberti, B., 2014b: Designing body-pots in the Early Formative La Candelaria Culture, northwest Argentina, in Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds), Making and growing. Anthropological studies of organisms and artefacts, Aldershot, 107–25.Google Scholar
Alberti, B., Fowles, S., Holbraad, M., Marshall, Y. and Witmore, C.L., 2011: ‘Worlds otherwise’. Archaeology, anthropology and ontological difference, Current anthropology 52 (6), 896–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J., 2010: Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Cordova, V.F., 2007: How it is. The Native American philosophy of V.F. Cordova, Tucson.Google Scholar
Descola, P., 1996: The spears of twilight. Life and death in the Amazon jungle, New York.Google Scholar
Fowles, S., 2013: An archaeology of doings. Secularism and the study of Pueblo religion, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Green, L., and Green, D., 2013: Knowing the day, knowing the world. Engaging Amerindian thought in public archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Harris, O., and Robb, J., 2012: Multiple ontologies and the problem of the body in history, American anthropologist 114 (4), 668–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopenawa, D., and Albert, B., 2013: The falling sky. Words of a Yanomami shaman, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lucas, G., 2012: Understanding the archaeological record, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, B. 2010: In defense of things. Archaeology and the ontology of objects, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Olsen, B., Shanks, M., Webmoor, T. and Witmore, C.L., 2012: Archaeology. The discipline of things, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Proust, M. 1993: In search of lost time, Vol. 5. The captive, the fugitive, New York.Google Scholar
Scott, M.W., 2014: To be a wonder. Anthropology, cosmology, and alterity, in Abramson, A. and Holbraad, M. (eds), Framing cosmologies. The anthropology of worlds, Manchester, 31–54.Google Scholar
Spivak, G.C., 1999: A critique of postcolonial reason. Towards a history of the vanishing present, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stengers, I., 2011: Wondering and materialism, in Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. and Harman, G. (eds), The speculative turn. Continental materialism and realism, Melbourne, 68–80.Google Scholar
Verran, H., 2001: Science and an African logic, Chicago.Google Scholar
Verran, H., 2014: Anthropology as ontology is comparison as ontology. Fieldsights. Theorizing the contemporary. Cultural anthropology online, 13 January 2014, at www.culanth.org/fieldsights/468-anthropology-as-ontology-is-comparison-as-ontology.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2003: Anthropology (AND) science, at http://abaete.wikia.com/wiki (also published in Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology 7).Google Scholar
Walz, J., forthcoming: Healing space–time. Medical performance and object itineraries on a Tanzanian landscape.Google Scholar