Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:00:33.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Framing matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Reinhard Bernbeck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kerstin Hofmann and Philipp Stockhammer's essay on theory in ‘Beyond antiquarianism’ displays a mood that lacks self-confidence, despite a more optimistic outlook on theoretical reflections in their field than an earlier paper by Ulrike Sommer (2000b). The citations, amounting to 60 per cent of the text, are just an outward sign of that mood. A more revealing element is the essay's framing. Hofmann and Stockhammer do not discuss theory in German-speaking archaeology, as their abbreviation ‘GSA’ seems to imply, but rather restrict themselves to its prehistoric subdivision: the essay is actually only about ‘GSPA’. What are the preconditions for and the consequences of this self-imposed disciplinary (and disciplining) restriction?

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , June 2017 , pp. 36 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, G., 1998: Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life, tr. Heller-Roazen, Daniel, Stanford.Google Scholar
Altekamp, S., 2004: Das archäologische Gedächtnis, in K. Ebeling and S. Altekamp (eds), Die Aktualität des Archäologischen in Wissenschaft, Medien und Künsten, Frankfurt am Main, 211–32.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 1992: Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 1998: Moses der Ägypter. Entzifferung einer Gedächtnisspur. Munich.Google Scholar
Assmann, J., 2005: Die Zauberflöte. Oper und Mysterium, Munich.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R., 2009a: Class conflict in ancient Mesopotamia. Between knowledge of history and historicising knowledge, Anthropology of the Middle East 4 (1), 33–64.Google Scholar
Charim, I., 2009: Der Althusser-Effekt. Entwurf einer Ideologietheorie, Vienna.Google Scholar
Descola, P., 2005: Par-delà nature et culture, Paris.Google Scholar
Hahn, H.P., 2015: Der Eigensinn der Dinge. Einleitung, in Hahn, H.P. (ed), Vom Eigensinn der Dinge. Für eine neue Perspektive auf die Welt des Materiellen, Berlin, 9–56.Google Scholar
Holzkamp, K., 1972: Kritische Psychologie, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Honneth, A., 2003: Unsichtbarkeit. Stationen einer Theorie der Intersubjektivität, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Honneth, A., 2014: Verdinglichung. Eine anerkennungstheoretische Studie, 2nd edn, with commentaries, Berlin.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R., 2000: Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C., 1985: Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics, London.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1991: Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique, Paris.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1999: Politiques de la nature. Comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie, Paris.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A., 2015: Geschichte ohne Dinge? Materielle Kultur zwischen Beiläufigkeit und Quelle, Historische Anthropologie 23 (3), 431–45.Google Scholar
Niethammer, L., 2000: Kollektive Identität. Heimliche Quellen einer unheimlichen Konjunktur, Reinbek b. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Pollock, S., 2007: The royal cemetery of Ur. Ritual, tradition, and the creation of subjects, in Heinz, M. and Feldman, M.H. (eds), Representations of political power. Case histories from times of change and dissolving order in the ancient Near East, Winona Lake, IN, 89–110.Google Scholar
Smith, A.T., 2004: The end of the essential archaeological subject, Archaeological dialogues 11 (1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockhammer, P.W., Massy, K., Knipper, C., Friedrich, R., Kromer, B., Lindauer, S., Radosavljević, J., Wittenborn, F. and Krause, J., 2015: Rewriting the Central European Early Bronze Age chronology. Evidence from large-scale radiocarbon dating, PLoS ONE 10 (10), e0139705.Google Scholar
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2002: A inconstância da alma selvagem, São Paulo.Google Scholar
Winker, G., and Degeler, N., 2010: Intersektionalität. Zur Analyse sozialer Ungleichheiten, 2nd edn, Bielefeld.Google Scholar
Yoffee, N., and Sherratt, A. (eds), 1993: Archaeological theory. Who sets the agenda?, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar