Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:38:09.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do the swans deceive us all?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

Brian Boyd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A theoretically nuanced human–animal studies now stands at the forefront of many academic disciplines. The ‘theoretical lag’ characteristic of archaeology means that a subject largely reliant on the remains of humans and animals, and their associated material residues, lies lacking in theoretical sophistication.

Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , December 2013 , pp. 143 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, C., and Donovan, J. (eds), 1995: Animals and women, Durham.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., 1998: Animals, science, and spectacle in the city, in Wolch, J. and Emel, J. (eds), Animal geographies, London and New York, 27–50Google Scholar
Anderson, K., 1997: A walk on the wild side. A critical geography of domestication, Progress in human geography 21, 463–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arluke, A., and Sanders, C.R., 1996: Regarding animals (animals, culture and society), Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Armstrong Oma, K., and Hedeager, L., 2010: Introduction, World archaeology, 42 (2), 155–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birke, L., 1991a: Science, feminism and animal natures: I. Extending the boundaries, Women's studies international forum 14, 443–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birke, L., 1991b: Science, feminism and animal natures: II. Feminist critiques and the place of animals in science, Women's studies international forum 14, 451–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birke, L., 1995: Exploring the boundaries. Feminisms, animals and science, in Adams, C. and Donovan, J. (eds), Animals and women, Durham, 32–54.Google Scholar
Bruns, G.L., 2007: Becoming-animal (simple ways), New literary history 38 (4), 703–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calarco, M., 2008: Zoographies. The question of the animal from Heidegger to Derrida, New York.Google Scholar
Conneller, C., 2004: Becoming deer. Corporeal transformations at Star Carr, Archaeological dialogues 11 (1), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F., 1987 (1980): A thousand plateaus. Capitalism and schizophrenia (tr. Massumi, Brian), Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., 2004: The animal that therefore I am (more to follow), in Atterton, P. and Calarco, M. (eds), Animal philosophy, London, 113–28.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., 2008: The animal that therefore I am (tr. Wills, David), New York.Google Scholar
Descola, P., and Palsson, G., 1996: Introduction, in Descola, P. and Palsson, G. (eds), Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives, London, 1–21.Google Scholar
Haraway, D., 1991: A cyborg manifesto. Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century, in Haraway, D., Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature, New York, 151–52.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1995: The fundamental concepts of metaphysics. World, finitude, solitude (tr. McNeill, William and Walker, Nicholas), Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Kalof, L., and Fitzgerald, A. (eds), 2007: The animals reader. The essential classic and contemporary writings, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lucht, M., and Yarri, D. (eds), 2010: Kafka's animals. Animals, hybrids, and other fantastic beings, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Miracle, P., and Milner, N. (eds), 2002: Consuming passions, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Philo, C. 1995: Animals, geography and the city. Notes on inclusions and exclusions, Environment and planning D. Society and space 13, 655–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, V., 1993: Feminism and the mastery of nature, London.Google Scholar
Wolch, J., and Emel, J. (eds), 1998: Animal geographies. Place, politics, and identity in the nature–culture borderlands, London.Google Scholar
Wolch, J., West, K. and Gaines, T.E., 1995: Transspecies urban theory, Environment and planning D. Society and space 13, 735–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, C. (ed.) 2003: Zoontologies. The question of the animal, Minneapolis.Google Scholar