Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:35:08.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXXI. A Letter to the Secretary, on the Origin of the English Language. By the Rev. Mr. Drake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2012

Get access

Extract

Though I admire Mr. Whitaker's knowledge, and look upon his late publication of Manchester as a very valuable acquisition to the literary world, yet, I confess, I cannot acquiesce in every assertion that is there advanced. In a chapter of that work that relates to the origin of the English language, he seems to insist, if I apprehend his meaning aright, that the English tongue was radically formed of Celtick or British materials, and derived little or no assistance from the Teutonick. This is a doctrine as new as it is strange, and seems to require more arguments in support of it than he has been pleased to give us. And yet he is so warm and determined in the certainty of this position, that he treats all others, that may unfortunately have adopted a different system, as rash and presumptuous, and destitute of every knowledge of antiquity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1779

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 310 note * The passage however is accurately referred to, and to be found, in Dr. Hickes's Anglo-Saxon grammar, p. 92, where uvas is used for grapes, though the word may be rendered winberian in the printed version of the Anglo-Saxon gospel, which is not cited in the Archaeologia, vol. III. p. 89.