No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
Dr. Stukely has accurately distinguished two kind of shrines, both equally made for receiving the reliques of saints: but with this difference, that one sort was portable, and used in processions; and the other fixed, as being built of stone, marble, and other heavy materials.
page 23 note [o] Philosoph. Transact, Num. CCCCXC. pag. 580.
page 24 note [p] Glossar. Lat.
page 24 note [q] Apparat. ad W. Hemingford p. 145.
page 24 note [r] Somner's Cant. p. 95. not. e.
page 24 note [s] Tanner, Biblioth. p. 279.
page 24 note [t] Notit. Monast. p. 112. b.
page 24 note [u] Widmore's Hist. of Westm. Abb. p. 235.
page 24 note [x] p. 125.
page 24 note [y] pag. 6, 114, 115, 144, 145, 159.
page 24 note [z] Hemingford, ubi supra.
page 24 note [a] pag. 125.
page 24 note [b’ pag. 144, 145.
page 24 note [c] pag. 76, 77, 115, 148, 161.
page 24 note [c] Ibid. pag. 7, 81.
page 25 note [d] Vetust. Monument. Rer. Britann. Vol. I. Numb. xvi.
page 25 note [e] Matth. Paris, p. 261.
page 25 note [f] L. xxi.
page 25 note [g] Cantab. Sacr. pag. 27. num. xviii.
page 25 note [h] Ancient fun. monum. p. 381.
page 25 note [i] In voce Tabernaculum.
page 25 note [k] Pag. 163.
page 25 note [l] Worthies of Herefordshire, pag. 36.
page 26 note [m] Somner's Cantab. pag. 130.
page 26 note [n] Battely, ubi supra, and Carte's Hist. Vol. II. p. 358.