Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:27:51.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—The Nunburnholme Cross and Anglo-Danish Sculpture in York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Get access

Extract

In 1915 Professor W. G. Collingwood completed his survey of all the Anglian and Anglo-Danish sculpture in Yorkshire. The Addenda to York published then added three fragments to the twenty-four ‘certainly or probably local to the city’. Since then, the grand total of twenty-seven has at least trebled. The main sources for this spectacular increase are the demolition of, and subsequent excavations on the site of, the church of St. Mary Bishophill Senior in 1963–4, and the much larger operations at York minster, begun in 1966 and recently completed. A full catalogue of the latter must await the completion of the excavation report. Finds to the southwest of the river Ouse appear in a recent inventory of the Royal Commission on Historical Monuments. Further sculptures were found in Newgate5 and All Saints, Pavement. The material for consideration grows steadily, and it is now clear that York was an important centre for sculpture before the Norman Conquest. This paper is limited to consideration of the later Anglo-Danish sculpture, which involves presentation of recent discoveries and reassessment of some of the sculpture described by Collingwood. It also includes a reassessment of the Nunburnholme cross, which provides parallels for many of the features of York sculpture, and is now no longer an isolated work. As there is much new material to be considered, the individual carvings will be listed and briefly described, beginning with the Nunburnholme cross, which serves as a key to the different elements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 209 note 1 Collingwood, W. G., Y.A.J. xxiii (1915), 129299Google Scholar.

page 209 note 2 Ibid., pp. 260–1.

page 209 note 3 Ibid, xx (1909), 149.

page 209 note 4 R.C.H.M., City of York, vol. iii, South-West of the Ouse, 1972.

page 209 note 5 Y.P.S., Annual Report for 1963, 17.

page 209 note 6 Cramp, Rosemary, Anglian and Viking York (1967), pp. 1920Google Scholar.

page 209 note 7 Morris, M. C. F., Nunburnholme (1907), p. 82Google Scholar.

page 209 note 8 Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England, vol. vi, part ii (1937)Google Scholar, pls. xc-xciii.

page 209 note 9 Collingwood, W. G., Y.A.J. xxi, part 83 (1911), 266Google Scholar.

page 210 note 1 Morris, op. tit., pls. vi and viii.

page 210 note 2 Ibid., p. 83.

page 210 note 3 Ibid., p. 185.

page 210 note 4 Baldwin Brown, op. tit., p. 259.

page 210 note 5 Morris, op. tit., p. 83.

page 210 note 6 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., p. 258.

page 210 note 7 Ibid., pl. LXXII.

page 210 note 1 Calendar of Patent Rolls, 1334–38, p. 399.

page 215 note 1 Collingwood, op. cit. (1909), pp. 206–7.

page 215 note 2 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), p. 261.

page 215 note 3 Douglas, David C. (ed.), English Historical Documents ii, 1042–1189 (1953), pp. 132–3Google Scholar.

page 216 note 1 Collingwood, op. cit. (1909), pp. 190, 193.

page 216 note 2 Ibid., pp. 168–9.

page 216 note 3 Ibid., pp. 162, 165, 169.

page 216 note 4 Ibid., pp. 162, 163.

page 217 note 1 R.C.H.M., op. cit., p. 33, Stone (1), pl. 25.

page 217 note 2 Collingwood, op. cit. (1909), pp. 170, 173, 177.

page 218 note 1 Grove, L. R. A., Y.A.J. xxxv (1943), 24Google Scholar.

page 218 note 2 R.C.H.M., op. cit., p. 33, pl. 25, Stone (3).

page 218 note 3 Collingwood, op. cit. (1909), pp. 162–3.

page 218 note 4 R.C.H.M., op. cit., p. 29.

page 218 note 5 Collingwood, op. cit. (1909), pp. 176–8.

page 218 note 6 Unpublished; N.M.R. photograph BB68/10372.

page 218 note 7 Kendrick, T. D., Late Saxon and Viking Art (1949)Google Scholar, pl. li.

page 219 note 1 Professor Cramp suggests that the York tradition of arched niches derives from Mercia rather than North-umbria.

page 219 note 2 Kendrick, op. cit., pls. l, li, and xlii.

page 219 note 3 Ibid., p, 90.

page 219 note 4 Ibid., pl. li.

page 221 note 1 Clapham, A., English Romanesque Architecture before the Conquest (1930), pl. 21Google Scholar; and Davies, D. S., ‘Pre-Conquest Carved Stones in Lincolnshire’, Arch. J. lxxxiii (1926), pl. v, 13Google Scholar.

page 221 note 2 Op. cit., p. 100, pl. LXXVIII, 1, and fig. 13.

page 221 note 3 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), p. 230.

page 221 note 4 Collingwood, W. G., Northumbrian Crosses of the Pre-Norman Age (1927), p. 40Google Scholar, fig. 50.

page 223 note 1 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), p. 212.

page 223 note 2 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., pl. LXXIX; and as previous footnote.

page 223 note 3 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., pl. LXXII; and Kendrick, op. cit., pl. XLIII.

page 223 note 4 Calverley, W. S., Early Sculptured Crosses, Shrines and Monuments in the Diocese of Carlisle, ed. Collingwood, W. G. (1899)Google Scholar, plate facing p. 231.

page 223 note 5 Kendrick, op. cit., pl. Li.

page 223 note 6 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), pp. 257–8.

page 223 note 7 Professor Cramp suggests an alternative derivation to the ‘curly halo’ in the ‘Byzantine’ veil found at Breedon. She dates a cross at Ilkley, on which the feature also occurs, to the ninth century.

page 223 note 8 Collingwood, op. cit. (1927), p. 83.

page 224 note 1 Collingwood, op. cit. (1927), p. 90.

page 224 note 2 Ibid., pp. 168–9.

page 224 note 3 Ibid., pp. 172–3.

page 224 note 1 Ibid., p. 84.

page 224 note 5 Ibid., p. 40.

page 224 note 6 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), pp. 237–9.

page 224 note 7 Henderson, Isabel, The Picts (1967), p. 221Google Scholar, pl. 52.

page 224 note 8 Collingwood, op. cit. (1927), p. 55.

page 224 note 9 R. E. Routh, introduction by Clark-Maxwell, W. G., ‘A Corpus of the Pre-Conquest Carved Stones of Derbyshire’, Arch. J. xciv (1937–8), 6Google Scholar n. 1, 18, pl. VIIIA.

page 224 note 10 Routh, op. cit., 5–7, pl. 11.

page 225 note 1 Professor Cramp suggests different models for the different drapery techniques and considers that at least two different carvers worked on the cross.

page 225 note 2 Collingwood, op. cit. (1911), p. 269.

page 225 note 3 Binns, A. L., The Viking Century in Yorkshire (1963), p. 39Google Scholar.

page 225 note 4 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., p. 261.

page 225 note 5 Binns, op. cit., pls. on pp. 2 and 42; Pevsner, N., York-shire, The North Riding (1966)Google Scholar.

page 226 note 1 Henry, Framçoise, Irish Art during the Viking Invasions, 800–1020 A.D. (1967)Google Scholar, pl. 95.

page 226 note 2 Kendrick, op. cit., pl. XLII.

page 226 note 3 Henry, Framboise, Irish Art in the Early Christian Period to 800 A.D. (1965), pp. 128–30Google Scholar.

page 226 note 4 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., p. 263.

page 226 note 5 Henry, op. cit. (1965), pls. 92 and 95.

page 226 note 6 Henderson, op. cit., pl. 50.

page 226 note 7 Ibid., pl. 60.

page 226 note 8 The Revd.Powell, F. W., St. Gregory's Minster, Kirkdale (1956)Google Scholar, unnumbered pages 6, 9, 13.

page 226 note 9 Brönsted, J., Early English Ornament (1924), p. 232Google Scholar.

page 226 note 10 Arbman, Holger, The Vikings (1961), p. 19Google Scholar.

page 226 note 11 Ibid., pl. 31.

page 227 note 1 Collingwood, op. cit. (1911), p. 268.

page 227 note 2 Collingwood, Y.A.J. xix (1907), p. 385.

page 227 note 3 Druce, G. C., ‘some Abnormal and Composite Human Forms in English Church Architecture’, Arch. J. lxxii (1915). 135Google Scholar.

page 227 note 4 Henderson, op. cit., pl. 57.

page 227 note 5 Hammond, N. G. L. and Scullard, H. H. (eds.), The Oxford Classical Dictionary (2nd edn. 1970), p. 220Google Scholar, on ‘Centaurs’.

page 227 note 6 Collingwood, op. cit. (1911), p. 268.

page 227 note 7 Lucian, , Satirical Sketches (1961), pp. 31–3Google Scholar.

page 227 note 8 Stoll, R., Architecture and Sculpture in Early Britain (1967). Pl. 87Google Scholar.

page 227 note 9 Morris, op. cit., p. 151; and Fines, Yorkshire (John), Surtees Society, xciv (1897 for 1894), 101Google Scholar, no. cclv iii.

page 228 note 1 Henry, op. cit. (1967), pl. 98.

page 228 note 2 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), pp. 137–9.

page 228 note 3 Op. cit. (1927), p. 162.

page 228 note 4 Collingwood, op. cit. (1907), pp. 390, 393.

page 229 note 1 Peers, C. R., ‘The Inscribed and Sculptured Stones of Lindisfarne’, Arch, lxxiv (1923–4)Google Scholar, pl. LII, fig. 5.

page 229 note 2 Ibid., pl. LIV, fig. 1.

page 229 note 3 Henry, op. cit. (1967), pl. 95.

page 229 note 4 Collingwood, op. cit. (1907), p. 353.

page 229 note 5 Collingwood, op. cit. (1915), pp. 234–5.

page 229 note 6 Collingwood, op. cit. (1911), pp. 268–9, 290.

page 230 note 1 An earlier photograph, taken when the details were more distinct, is reproduced by Baldwin Brown, op. cit., pl. LXXVIII.

page 230 note 2 Blair, Peter Hunter, An Introduction to Anglo-Saxon England (1966)Google Scholar, pl. xiv.

page 230 note 3 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., pl. lxxx.

page 230 note 4 Ibid., pl. lxxxiii.

page 230 note 5 Davidson, H. R. Ellis, Pagan Scandinavia (1967), pp. 126–7Google Scholar.

page 230 note 6 Druce, op. cit., p. 135.

page 230 note 7 Op. cit., pp. 192 f.

page 230 note 8 Ibid., pp. 195–7.

page 230 note 9 Op. cit. (1927), p. 162.

page 231 note 1 Darby, H. C. and Maxwell, I. S. (eds.), The Domesday Geography of Northern England (1962), p. 401Google Scholar.

page 231 note 2 Collingwood, op. cit. (1927), p. 156.

page 231 note 3 Kendrick, op. cit., pl. XLIV.

page 231 note 4 Baldwin Brown, op. cit., p. 261; and Binns, op. cit.,

page 231 note 5 Morris, op. cit., pp. 82–3.

page 231 note 6 Busch and Lohse (eds.), Pre-Romanesque Art (1966), pl. 110.

page 231 note 7 Kendrick, op. cit., pl. 11.

page 231 note 8 Conant, K., Carolingian and Romanesque Architecture 1959)Google Scholar, pl. 32c.

page 231 note 9 Zarnecki, George, English Romanesque Sculpture 1066–1140 (1951)Google Scholar, pl. 10.

page 232 note 1 Ibid., pl. 9.

page 232 note 2 Morris, op. cit., p. 21.

page 232 note 3 Stubbs, 1704; Leland Collectanea, iv, 102–3; W. H. Dixon (ed. J. Raine), Fasti Eboracenses (1863), p. 142.

page 233 note 1 R. Liess, Der frühromanische Kirchenbau des ii. Jahrhunderts in der Normandie (1967), pp. 166–83.

page 233 note 2 Grodecki, Louis, ‘Les Débuts de la sculpture romane en Normandie, Bernay’, Bulletin monumental 108 (1950), 396402Google Scholar, and Les Chapiteaux de Bernay’, Bulletin monumental 109 (1951), 767Google Scholar.

page 233 note 3 Héliot, Pierre, ‘sur les dates de construction des abbatiales de Bernay, Cérisy-la-Forêt et Lessay’, Bulletin de la société nationale des antiquaires de France (1959), 188204Google Scholar.

page 233 note 4 Ricket, Margaret, Painting in Britain: The Middle Ages (1954), p. 57Google Scholar n. 81.

page 233 note 5 Zarnecki, G., ‘1066 and Architectural Sculpture’, Proceedings of the British Academy (1966), pp. 87104Google Scholar.

page 233 note 6 Liess, op. cit., p. 172.