Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:55:18.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—The Jutish Style A. A Study of Germanic Animal Art in Southern England in the Fifth Century A.D*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2011

Sonia Chadwick Hawkes
Get access

Extract

In 1915 Professor Baldwin Brown drew attention to a class of metalwork, found in Anglo-Saxon graves in the south of England, and decorated with examples of a distinctive animal style, more naturalistic than Anglo-Saxon style I. This style he considered to be a direct descendant of late Roman art forms, although produced, not in the years immediately following the Anglo-Saxon settlement, but after a considerable time lapse, towards the middle of the sixth century. A similar view was expressed in 1923 by Reginald Smith. Nils Åberg, writing in 1926, was noncommittal about dates, but saw the inspiration for the style in a blend of late Roman and Eastern Mediterranean tradition. It was not until 1936, however, that a more detailed critical estimate of the objects was published, this time by E. T. Leeds in his Early Anglo-Saxon Art and Archaeology. Leeds compared their decoration with that of examples of Gallo-Roman art in the late fourth and early fifth centuries and concluded that they came from the same style milieu. He wrote:

All the pieces here noticed clearly belong to a cultural phase, presenting indeed many affinities to the Germanic style of the settlement period; but, in reality, they represent a continental style antecedent to that development in southern England. … There is every reason to believe that they are objects ante-dating the invasion, and, if it is desired to know what native women were wearing before or at the time of Hengist’s landing, this group supplies the information.

Type
Research Article
Information
Archaeologia , Volume 98 , 1961 , pp. 29 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åberg, N., Den Nordiska Folkvandringstidens Kronologi (1924).Google Scholar
Åberg, N., The Anglo-Saxons in England (1926).Google Scholar
Alföldi, A., ‘Eine spåtrömische Helmform und ihre Schicksale im Germanische-Romanischen Mittelalter’, Acta Archaeologica (1934).Google Scholar
Behrens, G., ‘Spätrömische Kerbschnittschnallen’, Schumacher Festschrift (1930), 286 ff.Google Scholar
Böhner, K., Das Grab eines fränkischen Herren aus Morken im Rheinland (Rheinisches Landesmuseum, Bonn, 1959).Google Scholar
Brailsford, J., Guide to the Antiquities of Roman Britain (British Museum, 1951).Google Scholar
Brailsford, J., The Mildenhall Treasure (British Museum Handbook, 2nd ed. 1955).Google Scholar
Breuer, J. and Roòsens, H., Le Cimetière Franc de Haillot (Archaeologica Belgica, xxxiv, 1957).Google Scholar
Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts and Crafts of our Teutonic Forefathers (1910).Google Scholar
Brown, G. Baldwin, The Arts in Early England (1915).Google Scholar
Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S., The Sutton Hoo Ship Burial: a provisional guide (British Museum, 1947).Google Scholar
Chadwick, Sonia, ‘Note on an early Anglo-Saxon square-headed brooch from Canterbury’, Antiquaries Journal, xxxviii (1958), 52 ff.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Sonia, ‘The Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Finglesham, Kent: a reconsideration’, Medieval Archaeology, ii (1958), 1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochet, J. B. D., La Normandie souterraine (1854).Google Scholar
Curie, A., The Treasure of Traprain (1923).Google Scholar
Dasnoy, A., ‘Les Premières Damasquinures mérovingiennes de la région namuroise’, Annales Société Archéologique de Namur, xlvii (1954), 267 ff.Google Scholar
Douglas, J., Nenia Britannica (1793).Google Scholar
Eck, T., Les deux cimetières gallo-romains de Vermand et St. Quentin (1891).Google Scholar
Engelhardt, C., Thorsbjerg Mosefund (1863).Google Scholar
Evison, Vera, ‘Early Anglo-Saxon inlaid metalwork’, Antiquaries Journal, xxxv (1955), 20 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evison, Vera, ‘Further Anglo-Saxon inlay’, Antiquaries Journal, xxxviii (1958), 240 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fettich, N., ‘Der Schildbuckel von Herpály’, Acta Archaeologica, 1 (1930).Google Scholar
Fettich, N., ‘Der zweite Schatz von Szilágy Somlyò’, Acta Archaeologica Musei Nationalis Hungarici, viii (1932).Google Scholar
Forssänder, J., ‘Provinzialrömisches und Germanisches’, Meddelanden från Lunds Universitets Historiska Museum, vii (1937).Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C., ‘The Jutes of Kent’, Dark Age Britain: Studies presented to E. T. Leeds, (1956), 91 ff.Google Scholar
Henning, R., Der Helm von Baldenheim und die verwandten Helme des frühen Mittelalters (1907)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Françoise, ‘Hanging Bowls’, Journal Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland, lxvi pt. ii (1936), 209 ff.Google Scholar
Henry, Françoise, ‘Irish enamels of the Dark Ages and their relation to the cloisonné techniques’, Dark Age Britain: Studies presented to E. T. Leeds (1956), 71 ff.Google Scholar
Hillier, G., The History and Antiquities of the Isle of Wight (1856).Google Scholar
Holmquist, W., Tauschierte Metallarbeiten des Nordens (1951).Google Scholar
Holmquist, W., Germanic Art in the 1st Millennium A.D. (1955).Google Scholar
Hougen, B., The Migration Style in Norway (1936).Google Scholar
Kendrick, T. D., ‘British Hanging Bowls’, Antiquity, vi (1932), 161 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, T. D., ‘Polychrome Jewellery in Kent’, Antiquity, vii (1933), 429 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendrick, T. D., ‘Style in early Anglo-Saxon Ornament’, I.P.E.K. (1934), 66–76.Google Scholar
Kendrick, T. D., Anglo-Saxon Art to A.D. 900 (1938).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, J. R. and Leeds, E. T., ‘Three early Saxon graves from Dorchester, Oxon.’, Oxoniensia, xvii–xviii (1953), 63 ff.Google Scholar
Kühn, H., Die germanischen Bügelfibeln der Völkerwanderungszeit in der Rheinprovinz (1940).Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., The Archaeology of the Anglo-Saxon Settlements (1913).Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., Early Anglo-Saxon Art and Archaeology (1936).Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., ‘The distribution of the Angles and Saxons archaeologically considered’, Archaeologia, xci (1945), 1–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T., ‘Denmark and Early England’, Antiquaries Journal, xxvi (1946), 31 ff.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., A Corpus of Early Anglo-Saxon Square-headed Brooches (1949).Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T., ‘Anglo-Saxon Exports: a criticism’, Antiquaries Journal, xxxiii (1953), 208 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, E. T. (ed. by Sonia Chadwick), ‘Notes on Jutish art in Kent between 450 and 575’, Medieval Archaeology, i (1957), 5 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lethbridge, T. C., A Cemetery at Lackford, Suffolk (1951).Google Scholar
Lindenschmitt, L., Handbuch der deutschen Altertumskunde (1880–9).Google Scholar
Mackeprang, M. B., De Nordiske Guldbrakteater (1952).Google Scholar
Nenquin, J., La nécropole de Furfooz (1953).Google Scholar
Norberg, P., ‘Moor- und Depotfunde aus dem 5. Jahrhundert nach Chr. in Schonen’, Acta Archaeologia, ii (1931), 104 ff.Google Scholar
Ôberg, H., Guldbrakteaterna från Nordens Folkvandringstid (1942).Google Scholar
Pilloy, J., Études sur d'andens lieux de sépultures dans l'Aisne (1896–1912), 3 volumes.Google Scholar
Riegl, A., Spätrömische Kunstindustrie (1927).Google Scholar
Smith, C. Roach, The Antiquities of Richborough, Reculver, and Lymne (1850).Google Scholar
Salin, B., Die altgermanische Thierornamentik (1904).Google Scholar
Savory, H. N., ‘Some sub-Romano-British brooches from South Wales’, Dark Age Britain: Studies presented to E. T. Leeds (1956), 40 ff.Google Scholar
Shetelig, H., Vestlandske graver fra jernalderen (1912).Google Scholar
Shetelig, H., ‘The origins of the Scandinavian Style of Ornament in the Migration Period’, Archaeologia, xxvi (1927).Google Scholar
Shetelig, H., Classical Impulses in Scandinavian Art from the Migration Period to the Viking Age.Google Scholar
Slomann, Wencke, Saetrangfunnet: Norske Oldfunn, ix (1959).Google Scholar
Smith, R., Guide to the Anglo-Saxon and Foreign Teutonic Antiquities, British Museum (1923).Google Scholar
Voss, O., ‘The Hostentorp silver hoard and its period’, Acta Archaeologica, xxv (1954), 171–219.Google Scholar
Werner, J., ‘Spätrömische Gürtelgarnituren in Keilschnitt Technik’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäohgischen Instituts in Wien, xxvi (1930), 53–63.Google Scholar
Werner, J., Die beiden Zierscheiben des Thorsberger Moorfundes (1941).Google Scholar
Werner, J., ‘Zu fränkischen Schwertern des 5. Jahrhunderts’, Germania, xxxi (1953), 38–44.Google Scholar
Wheeler, R. E. M., London in Roman Times, London Museum (1930).Google Scholar
Willers, H., Die römische Bronzeeimer von Hemmoor (1901).Google Scholar
Wulff, O., Altchristliche und mittelalterliche, byzantische und italische Bildwerke (1909).Google Scholar
Ziegel, K., ‘Zum Spangenhelm von Stossen’, Ausgrabungen und Funde: Nachrichtenblatt für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, i, vol. v (1956).Google Scholar