^{page 50 note a} The situation of Camalodunum being placed by Ptolemy among the Trinobantes, they clearly might have possessed Essex, especially as he says that they were more eastern than the Catyeuchlani and other tribes whom he describes, that they were situate at the mouth of the Thames, παϱὰ τὴν Ἵμηνσαν ἔισχνσιν, (which I read Ταμέσης ἔισχυσιν,) and that the islands Tolingis and Counos lay below them, which I understand as signifying the Thanet and Canvey Islands. All this agrees with the supposition that the Thames ceased to be a river, where the respective boundaries of Cassivellaunus and the Trinobantes met, perhaps at the River Lea.

^{page 51 note a} Comm. De Bell. Gall. v. 21.

^{page 51 note b} The measurement cannot therefore be taken in the direction between Kent and Essex, but across the country.

^{page 52 note a} Mr. Lewin's position for Cæsar's landing-place.

^{page 53 note a} London, 1859, 4to. pp. 20, 21; and Archaeologia, vol. XXIX. pp. 159,160.

^{page 54 note a} Bell. Gall. iv. 17.

^{page 56 note a} Here Maitland or his editor interposes a notice of the Appian Way, as measured by Montfaucon, viz., “3 Parisian feet, or 3 feet 2½ inches English “measure.

^{page 57 note a} Maitland's History of London, continued by Entick, London, 1774, fol. vol. i. pp. 14, 15.