Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:20:57.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—A Technical Study of the Designs on the British Mirror Series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

P. R. Lowery ,
R. D. A. Savage  and
R. L. Wilkins
Get access

Extract

We have studied the techniques of decoration of the backs of the British bronze mirrors according to the methods outlined by us in Lowery, Savage, Wilkins, 1971, 176 f., and the construction of the design on the newly discovered Holcombe mirror (Fox, 1973). Our intention is to examine the technical relationships between the mirror backs and to note some details of bronzesmiths' practice which they illustrate, and on which the Holcombe mirror sheds much light. Our conclusions are based mainly on examination of silicone rubber moulds which, with the co-operation of the museums concerned, have been made of all the decorated mirror backs now available. In default of a similar study of any extensive body of other material, no comparisons outside the mirror series are cited. We are not here concerned with mirrors whose backs are undecorated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Archaeologia , Volume 105 , 1976 , pp. 99 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crawford, H. S., 1925. ‘The Engraved Bone Objects Found at Lough Crew, Co. Meath, in 1865’, J.R.S.A.I. 6th Series xv, 15–29.Google Scholar
Drescher, H., 1954. ‘Ein Beitrag zur Verwendung von Meßstäben und anderen Zeichenhilfsmitteln während der Bronzezeit’, Offa, xiii, 41–50.Google Scholar
Fox, A., 1973. ‘A Decorated Bronze Mirror from an Iron Age Settlement at Holcombe, near Uplyme, Devon,’ Antiq. Journ. liii, 21–41.Google Scholar
Fox, Sir Cyril, 1958. Pattern and Purpose. Cardiff.Google Scholar
Fox, Sir Cyril, 1960. ‘A Celtic Mirror from Great Chesterford’, Antiquity, xxxiv, 207–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, O.-H., 1955. ‘Eine etruskische Bronzeschnabelkanne’, Au Musée de Besançon 1 (= Annales Littéraires de l'Université de Besançon, 2e série ii, fasc. 1).Google Scholar
Hasluck, P. N., 1903. Engraving Metals. London.Google Scholar
Henry, F., 1965. Irish Art in the Early Christian Period. London.Google Scholar
Jacobsthal, P., 1944. Early Celtic Art. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowery, P. R., Savage, R. D. A., Wilkins, R. L., 1971. ‘Scriber, Graver, Scorper, Tracer’, P.P.S. xxxvii, 167–82.Google Scholar
Maryon, P., 1954. Metalwork and Enamelling. 3rd. ed., London.Google Scholar
Pagès-Allary, J., Déchelette, J., Lauby, A., 1903. ‘Le Tumulus arverne de Celles’, L'Anthropohgie xiv, 385–416.Google Scholar
Sandars, N. K., 1968. Prehistoric Art in Europe. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Spratling, M., 1970. ‘The Late Pre-Roman Iron Age Bronze Mirror from Old Warden’, Beds. Arch. J. v, 9–16.Google Scholar