Article contents
XXIII.—On the Relationship between Richard Fitz-James, Bishop of London, and Lord Chief Justice Sir John Fitz-James. By Edward Foss, Esq., F.S.A.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 June 2012
Extract
It too often happens, among biographers and genealogists, that erroneous dates and lineages, given by the first writer, are adopted without inquiry by those who follow him. Generations are thus not unfrequently omitted in pedigrees, and members of a family, bearing the same Christian name, become confounded with each other. Puzzling as every one engaged in such investigations must have found this practice in private descents, errors of this description are magnified in importance, when they have reference to persons of note and position; involving as they must do the difficulty of connecting the real parties with the facts that relate to them.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1854
References
page 306 note a Cal. Inquis. Post Mortem, vol. ii. p. 163.
page 306 note b Wood's Athenas Oxon. (1815), vol. ii. p. 720; Hutchins's Dorsetshire, vol. ii. p. 337.
page 306 note c Lord Campbell's Chief Justices of England, vol. i. p. 160.
page 306 note d Fuller's Worthies (1811), vol. ii. p. 283.
page 306 note e Wood's Athenæ Oxon. vol. ii. p. 722.
page 306 note f Hutchins's Dorsetshire, vol. ii. p. 337.
page 306 note g Chalmers's Biograph. Dictionary.
page 307 note a Cal. Inquis. Post Mortem, vol. iv. p. 375.
page 307 note b Testamenta Vetusta, p. 377.
page 307 note c Testamenta Vetusta, p. 597.
- 1
- Cited by