^{page 262 note 1} Antiquary, iii. 62-5.Google Scholar

^{page 264 note 1} Archaeologia, ix. 212.Google Scholar

^{page 264 note 2} Or perhaps a later Roman ditch, see p. 279.

^{page 265 note 1} Stow's Survey of London, C. L. Kingsford's edition, vol. i, p. 19.

^{page 287 note 1} On again referring to Mr. Fox's account of the bastion at King Edward Street, although he does not specially say so, it appears that this was also hollow at the base.

^{page 292 note 1} On a Bastion of London Wall, by Price, J. E., 1880, p. 26.Google Scholar

^{page 293 note 1} London and Middlesex Arch. Soc. Trans., n.s., vol. i, p. 357.Google Scholar

^{page 294 note 1} Archaeologia, vol. lix.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 1} Archaeologia, vol. lix, pl. xiii.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 2} Joum. Brit. Arch. Assoc, vol. xxxi, p. 26.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 3} Archaeologia, lix. 125.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 4} Antiquary, xii. 96.Google Scholar

^{page 296 note 1} Archaeologia, lx. 189.Google Scholar

^{page 295 note 2} Stow's Survey, Kingsford's, C. L. ed., i. 325.Google Scholar

^{page 298 note 1} London and Middlesex Arch. Soc. Trans., n. s., vol. i, p. 351.Google Scholar

^{page 299 note 1} Vestiges of Old London, by Archer, J. W., 1851.Google Scholar

^{page 300 note 1} Illustrated Family Journal, 1845.Google Scholar

^{page 301 note 1} Pall Mall Gazette, Feb. 3, 1886.Google Scholar

^{page 303 note 1} Archacologia, vol. xlviii, p. 222Google Scholar.

^{page 303 note 2} Stow's Survey, Kingsford's, C. L. ed., vol. i, pp. 87, 88.Google Scholar

^{page 305 note 1} Antiquities of London, 1792, two views and plan ; Ancient Topography of London, 1815Google Scholar.

^{page 305 note 2} Stozv's Survey, Kingsford's, C. L. ed., vol. i, p. 9.Google Scholar

^{page 305 note 3} Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc, v. 155; Collect. Antiq., i. 125; Antiquary, xxv. 51.

^{page 305 note 4} Roach Smith records his opinion (III. Rom. Lond., 18) that it then diverged towards St. Andrew's Hill, passing to the south of St. Andrew's Church, but of this the abrupt descent was his only evidence.

^{page 306 note 1} Excavations in Cranborne Chase by General Pitt-Rivers, vol. i, p. 27, ii, p. 56, iii, p. 3.

^{page 306 note 2} Translatio n of Fitz Stephen's account, Stow's Survey, Thorn's edition.

^{page 307 note 1} Archaeologia, vol. xxix, p. 150.

^{page 307 note 2} Illustrations of Roman London, 18. This description appears with unimportant variations in Archaeologia, vol. xxix, pp. 150-1.

^{page 308 note 1} Essex Naturalist, xvi. 258-62.

^{page 308 note 2} Tacitus, Annals, Book xiv, sect. 33 ‘Londinium—cognomento quidem coloniae non insigne sed copia negotiatorum et commeatuum maxime celebre’.

^{page 310 note 1} Antiquary, ii. 220.Google Scholar

^{page 310 note 2} V. C. H. London, p. 71.Google Scholar

^{page 310 note 3} Cat. Antiq. Roy. Exch., xxiii.Google Scholar

^{page 310 note 4} Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc, xxxviii. 130.Google Scholar

^{page 311 note 1} Royal MS. 18 D II, f. 148.

^{page 314 note 1} Parentalia, p. 265.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 1} Archaeologia, ix. 43.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 2} Journal of Roman Studies, vol. i, part 2, p. 167.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 3} V. C. H. London, i, p. 38, footnote.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 4} Journal of Roman Studies, vol. i, part 2, p. 156.Google Scholar

^{page 316 note 5} Archaeologia, Ix. 174-5.Google Scholar

^{page 317 note 1} Governance of London (1907), p. 72Google Scholar ; Geographical Journal (1908), xxxi. 491Google Scholar.

^{page 317 note 2} Anthrop. Rev., v. 71Google Scholar.

^{page 317 note 3} Arch. Journ., ix. 137-232Google Scholar; Archaeologia, lx. 169-85.Google Scholar

^{page 319 note 1} Illust. Rom. Lond., 14.Google Scholar

^{page 320 note 1} Cat. Antiq. New Royal Exchange, xii.Google Scholar

^{page 320 note 2} ‘A Description of the Sewers of the City of London and Liberties Hereof,’ 1840. (MS. Guildhall.)Google Scholar

^{page 321 note 1} Catalogue of the Antiquities found in the Excavations at the New Royal Exchange, 1848, p. xii.Google Scholar

^{page 321 note 2} Archaeologia, xxix. 154Google Scholar.

^{page 321 note 3} Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc, ii. 340.Google Scholar

^{page 321 note 4} N. S., xviii. 97.

^{page 323 note 1} Archaeologia, lx. 214.Google Scholar

^{page 324 note 1} Trans. Croyd. Nat. Hist, and Scient. Soc. (1911), p. 44.Google Scholar

^{page 327 note 1} Proceedings, xvii, p. 261.Google Scholar

^{page 328 note 1} Governance of London, 1907, pp. 94, 95.Google Scholar

^{page 328 note 2} Journal Brit. Arch. Assoc, vol. xxiv, pp. 109-112.Google Scholar

^{page 328 note 3} Watford's Antiquarian, 1885, vol. viii, pp. 57, 58.Google Scholar

^{page 334 note 1} Archaeologia, lx. 231Google Scholar

^{page 340 note 1} Trans. St. Paul's Eccl. Soc, vol. v, 1904Google Scholar . Symons's plan of the old church and that of the present church are there given side by side.

^{page 340 note 2} Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc. xliii. 203 (1887).Google Scholar

^{page 343 note 1} Sail-glased Stoneware, London, 1907.Google ScholarPubMed

^{page 343 note 2} Essex Arch. Soc. Trans., vol. xii, n.s., p. 177.Google Scholar

^{page 343 note 3} Essex Arch. Soc. Trans., vol. xii, n.s., p. 168.Google Scholar

^{page 344 note 1} Catalogue, Museum at Devizes, part ii, p. 67.Google ScholarPubMed