^{page 217 note 1} Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 4.

^{page 219 note 1} The part of area V dug to virgin soil was in the middle of the area, and does not, therefore, appear on all the sections of the sides of this area in pl. LXXIX.

^{page 219 note 2} For the artificial datum at 100 m., near the top of the mound, and the actual heights above sealevel, see Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 3, note 1.

^{page 219 note 3} The wood is being examined by Miss Bancroft.

^{page 220 note 1} Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 6–8.

^{page 220 note 2} Rooms 5 and 8b have not been dug below 92·40 m., so low floors have not been recorded in either.

^{page 223 note 1} O.I.P., xix, 102.

^{page 224 note 1} Op. cit., 36.

^{page 225 note 1} Shown in fig. 3 as an excrescence of the wall.

^{page 225 note 2} It is, however, significant that a fragmentary idol was found in room 7 at 93·2 m.: see p. 268.

^{page 228 note 1} The human remains have been submitted to Dr. Şevket Aziz Kansu, who has kindly undertaken to examine them.

^{page 230 note 1} Archaeologia, lxxxvi, IIff.

^{page 232 note 1} For remains of walls outside the fortified area, see p. 230.

^{page 232 note 2} Two sockets, one above the other, at 100·67 and 100·86 m. have been marked ⊗ on fig. 6.

^{page 232 note 3} Wall B and the buttress have been marked on fig. 6 as belonging to this period because they were later than A and earlier than the third stage: see above.

^{page 232 note 4} The stretch of masonry marked 101·56, parallel with the east end of wall Y, is merely the top courses of the wall slipped forward.

^{page 234 note 1} These walls, the east end of wall X and the lower part of the east end of wall Y, are marked as period 3 on fig. 6. It is possible that they belonged to a period intermediate between periods 2 and 3, but to avoid confusion this has not been indicated.

^{page 234 note 2} Bittel, Die Ruinen von Bogazköy, 13, 25; Puchstein, Boghasköi, Die Bauwerke, 42 ff. Here the space between the walls was strengthened by cross walls forming interior compartments.

^{page 234 note 3} O.I.P., xxviii, 214; xxix, 4, 290–2.

^{page 234 note 4} Woolley, Report on the Excavations at Jerablus on behalf of the British Museum, Part II: The Town Defences, 46.

^{page 234 note 5} Excavations at Phylakopi in Melos, 31 (Hellenic Society, Supplementary Papers, No. 4).

^{page 235 note 1} O.I.P., xxix, 290–2.

^{page 235 note 2} Bittel, op. cit., 13, 14, 25–7, 30, 32; Puchstein, op. cit., 39 ff. Compare also Excavations at Phylakopi, 30, fig. 15; 33.

^{page 235 note 3} Thermi, 44–7.

^{page 236 note 1} These began in period A: cf. Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 15.

^{page 236 note 2} B.M. Cat., i, part 1, pl. I; Thermi, pls. VIII, 140; XXXV, 115.

^{page 236 note 3} B.M. Cat., i, part 1, A 55; Thermi, pl. VIII, 284.

^{page 236 note 4} B.M. Cat., part 1, pl. I.

^{page 236 note 5} Compare O.I.P., xxviii, fig. 168, d2763 with S.S. 722, and Archaeologia, lxxxvi, pl. VII, 5.

^{page 236 note 6} O.I.P., xxviii, fig. 166.

^{page 236 note 7} Op. cit., loc. cit., nos. 2 and 7; fig. 75, e 1617; fig. 76, c 1509.

^{page 236 note 8} Op. cit., 152, pl. III, 1, 2.

^{page 236 note 9} I have examined this material at Ankara. The new excavations at Alaca Hüyük are published in Belleten, i, 181 ff.; further reports and illustrations in La Turquie Kamaliste, XV, 2–8, and Illustrated London News, 9 April, 1938. The short notices which have appeared on the Haşhüyük finds are recorded on p. 127 of P.F.K.

^{page 237 note 1} Türk Tarih, ii, 3 ff.; P.F.K., 60–1, 72–4. Some of the Ahlathbel bowls are very like specimens from Kusura: Türk Tarih, ii, 12 ff.

^{page 237 note 2} The vases found in the cemetery during 1936 are believed to belong to period A: see Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 16, 58, 59. Several of those on op. cit., pl. X, recall cups and jugs from Alişar 1; in particular O.I.P., xxviii, fig. 170, c915, d2828, e 1440, and fig. 171, c754.

^{page 237 note 3} P.F.K., 68, pls. XII, 1, 2, XVII; O.I.P., xxx, 425; the example from Mersin was reported in a lecture by Professor Garstang.

^{page 237 note 4} A.J.A., xxxix, 8, 557, 561, 562; xli, 21.

^{page 237 note 5} References, Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 4.

^{page 238 note 1} Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 11.

^{page 240 note 1} BK.K. and O.I.P., xxviii–xxx.

^{page 240 note 2} At Ankara. Unpublished.

^{page 251 note 1} See Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 28, 29; Thermi, 149 ff.; and P.F.K., 74–5 for references.

^{page 252 note 1} O.I.P., xix, 137, fig. 173; xxix, fig. 231, c677, fig. 232, e898, and examples on figs. 233–5.

^{page 252 note 2} P.F.K., 41, 74; O.I.P., xix, 55, 140, and figs. 174, 175; xxviii, 80, 81, 180–183; xxix, 193, 198–202; Türk Tarih, ii, 87; Belleten, i, fig. 18; S.S., 7644–9; BK.K., 18.

^{page 253 note 1} O.I.P., xix, 120–1, figs. 146, 147; xxviii, 93, 207; xxix, 273.

^{page 254 note 1} No. 21 is from the transitional period, no. 22 from period B.

^{page 256 note 1} Thermi, 159.

^{page 257 note 1} At Alişar, it appears earlier: see O.I.P., xxviii, 198, for its use in Alişar I.

^{page 258 note 1} A.J.A., xli, 277, 278, fig. 35.

^{page 260 note 1} Schliemann, Ilios, 489, no. 845; 497, nos. 878, 880.

^{page 260 note 2} I hope to submit samples of the stone implements to a specialist in order to have the materials properly identified, and to obtain information as to their probable sources.

^{page 263 note} 1 O.I.P., xxviii, fig. 90. For the squared butt see op. cit, loc. cit., e 1328.

^{page 263 note 2} O.I.P., xxviii, 82.

^{page 266 note 1} There are four fragments that may belong to other idols, but do not deserve description.

^{page 268 note 1} P.F.K., 37.

^{page 268 note 2} Thermi, 149, 177.

^{page 268 note 3} See also Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 31, fig. 12.

^{page 269 note 1} References, Thermi, 195.

^{page 269 note 2} Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 31, fig. 12, nos. 12–14.

^{page 269 note 3} Compare the stone whorls from Alişar, O.I.P., xxviii, 185, 269; xxix, 230.

^{page 269 note 4} O.I.P., xxix, fig. 481, e 1382.

^{page 270 note 1} O.I.P., xxix, 427.

^{page 270 note 2} Archaeologia, lxxxvi, 4.

^{page 270 note 3} O.I.P., xix, 66, 67, 172, 210.

^{page 273 note 1} Götze, Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatisch-Ägyptischen Gesellschaft, xxxii (1927) = Hethitische Texte in Umschrift, iii, 152–3.