No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
IV.—Sketch of British and Roman London
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2012
Extract
It is a commonly received opinion that London was planted by the Romans, and that before their arrival London had no existence. In the following remarks I propose—1. To show that London was, ab origine, a British city. 2. To endeavour to define what was the primitive site of it; and 3. To point out the gradual growth of London under the Roman domination.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1866
References
page 59 note a Being the substance of remarks made, partly orally, November 26th, 1863, and partly in writing, February 11th, 1864.
page 59 note b Lib. iv. c. 6.
page 59 note c Agric. c. 13.
page 59 note d Vacui a securibus et tributis. Tac. Ann. xii. c. 34.
page 60 note a Dion, lx. 19.
page 60 note b Dion, lx. 22.
page 61 note a Tac. Ann. xiv. 33.
page 61 note b Dion, lxii. 1.
page 61 note c Barbari, omissis castellis præsidiisque militarium, quod uberrimum spolienti et defendentibus intutum, læti prædâ et aliorum segnes, potebant. Tac. Ann. xiv. 33.
page 61 note d Cognomento quidem coloniæ non insigne sed copiâ negotiatorum et commeatuum maxime celebre. Tac. Ann. xiv. 33.
page 61 note e Ὄυτε νήσους οἶδα Κασσιτεϱίδας ἐούσας ἐκ τῶν ὁ κασσίτεϱος ἡμῖν ϕοιτᾶ. Herod, iii. 115.
page 62 note a Strabo, iii. 5.
page 62 note b B. G., iii. 9; iv. 20.
page 62 note c B. G., v. 12.
page 62 note d Strabo, iv. 5.
page 62 note e Χαλχώματα,, Strabo iii. 5, which agrees with Cæsar's statement, Ære utuntur importato. B. G. v. 12.
page 62 note f Strabo, iii. 5, iv. 6.
page 62 note g Tac. Ann. xiv. 33.
page 62 note h Dion. lx. 21.
page 63 note a Parentalia, p. 285.
page 63 note b Encyclop. Lond. vol. xiii. p. 426.
page 64 note a Bell. Gall. v. 21.
page 64 note b Cenimagni, Segontiaci, Ancalites, Bibroci, Cassi, legationibus missis, sese Cæsari dediderunt. Ibid.
page 64 note c Vastatis finibus, maxime etiam permotus defectione civitatum. Ibid. v. 22.
page 64 note d Ab his (the Cassi) cognoscit non longe ex eo loco oppidum Cassivellauni abesse. Ibid. v. 21.
page 64 note e Imanuentius in ea civitate (the Trinobantes) regnum obtinuerat interfectusque erat a Cassivellauno, ipse (Mandubratius) fugâ mortem vitaverat. Ibid. v. 20.
page 64 note f Summa imperii bellique administrandi, communi consilio permissa est Cassivellauno. Ibid. v. 11.
page 65 note a Cujus fines a maritimis civitatibus flumen dividit quod appellatur Thamesis, a mari circiter millia passuum lxxx. Bell. Gall. v. 11.
page 65 note b In fines Cassivellauni exercitum duxit. Ibid. v. 18.
page 65 note c Κατυευχλανοι. Ptol. lib. 2, c. S.
page 65 note d Κατουελλανοι. Dion, lx. 20.
page 66 note a Trinobantibus defensis atque ab omni militum injuriâ prohibitis. Bell. Gall. v. 21.
page 66 note b Ab his cognovit non longe ex eo loco oppidum Cassivellauni abesse. Ibid. v. 21.
page 66 note c Duabus ex partibus oppugnare contendit. Hostes sese ex aliâ parte oppidi ejecerunt. Ibid. v. 28.
page 66 note d Locum reperit egregie naturâ atque opere munitum. Ibid. v. 21.
page 66 note e Silvis paludibusque munitum. Ibid. v. 21.
page 66 note f See Parentalia, p. 265.
page 66 note e Encycl. Londin. article “London,” vol. xiii. p. 54.
page 67 note a Archæologia, vol. XXIV. p. 192.
page 67 note b Encycl. Londin. vol. xiii. p. 427.
page 67 note c Parentalia, p. 265.
page 67 note d See Encycl. Londin. vol. xiii. p. 429; Archæologia, vol. XXIX. p. 156.
page 68 note a Archæologia, vol. XXV. p. 600.
page 68 note b Ibid.
page 68 note c Id. vol. XXIX. p. 272.
page 68 note d Id. vol. XXVII. p. 140.
page 68 note e Id. vol. XXIX. p. 268.
page 69 note a Parentalia, p. 286
page 69 note b Ibid. p. 265.
page 69 note c Archæologia, vol. XXIX. p. 273.
page 70 note a Archæologia, vol. XXIX. pp. 155, 273.
page 70 note b Id. vol. IX. p. 273.
page 70 note c Id. vol. XXVII. p. 147.
page 70 note d Id. vol. XXIX. p. 203.