Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:27:51.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

II.—Excavations at Viroconium, 1936–7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2011

K. M. Kenyon
Get access

Extract

The city of Viroconium, with an area of about 170 acres, was the fourth largest city in Britain, and the largest one which owed its importance purely to the fact that it was a cantonal centre. It lies to-day almost entirely beneath farmlands, only a small part being covered by the modern village of Wroxeter. In spite of these facts, so encouraging and favourable to excavation, many of the problems of its history have not yet been solved. Only one series of excavations on the site have so far been scientifically executed and published, those carried out by Mr. J. P. Bushe-Fox, F.S.A. for the Society of Antiquaries in 1912–14, but these unfortunately did not reach any of the principal buildings of the city. The earlier excavations, in the middle of the nineteenth century, which located the well-known Bath Buildings, like all excavations of that date, did not produce any reliable evidence of the history of the site. The excavations carried out by Professor Donald Atkinson in 1924–6, which identified the Forum, have not yet been published.

Type
Research Article
Information
Archaeologia , Volume 88 , 1940 , pp. 175 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1940

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 175 note 1 Reports of the Research Committee of the Society of Antiquaries of London, nos. I, II, and IV. Excavations on the site of the Roman Town of Wroxeter, Shropshire, 1912,Google Scholar 1913, 1914. Referred to as Wroxeter I, II, III.

page 176 note 1 V. C. H. Shropshire, i, 242.

page 177 note 1 e.g. the first-century defences at Verulamium, though these are on a larger scale.

page 178 note 1 Wright, , Uriconium, p. 98.Google Scholar

page 179 note 1 See fig 2, nos. 1–6 for Samian, and brooch, fig. 15, no. 2.

page 179 note 1 Dr. T. Davies Pryce.

page 181 note 1 Cantrill, J. A., Arch. Camb. 1931.Google Scholar

page 181 note 2 Drawings, ii (Society of Antiquaries).

page 184 note 1 Fig. 4.

page 184 note 2 Fig. 9, nos. 16–24.

page 184 note 3 Fig. 9, nos. 7–13.

page 184 note 4 Figs. 5, 6.

page 184 note 5 I am indebted for this suggestion to Mr. J. P. Bushe‑Fox, F.S.A.

page 186 note 1 See pl. LXII, a, where the straight end of the south wall of room 6, in the left centre, was originally built up against the west wall of the main block, visible slightly to the right.

page 186 note 2 See pl. LXIV, b.

page 187 note 1 See pl. LXII, a, where the dividing wall is in the middle distance, beneath the two door sills.

page 188 note 1 See pl. LXV, a.

page 188 note 2 See the Verulamium Report, pp. 138–9.

page 188 note 3 For report on the bones see p. 227.

page 189 note 1 Section I, pl. LXIX.

page 189 note 2 See fig. 11, nos. 1–6.

page 191 note 1 Macdonald, G., Roman Britain 1914–28, Brit. Acad. Supp. Paper V, pp. 14–30.Google Scholar

page 191 note 2 Wright, p. 68.

page 191 note 3 Fig. 11, nos. 7–11.

page 192 note 1 Fig. 11, nos. 12–17.

page 192 note 2 Pl. LXVI, c.

page 195 note 1 For full details of levels see coarse pottery section, pp. 209–22.

page 198 note 1 T. Davies Pryce and Felix Oswald in Wheeler, R. E. M., The Roman Fort near BreconGoogle Scholar.

page 198 note 2 Ibid.

page 198 note 3 Birley, Eric in ‘Excavations on Hadrian's Wall, etc.’ (Cumberland and WestmorlandAntiquarian and Archaeological Society's Transactions, vol. xxx, fig. 11, 5 and 6).Google Scholar

page 200 note 1 Lowther, A. W. G., ‘Report on Excavations at Verulamium in 1934’, Antiq. Journ., xvii, I, fig. 8, 3.Google Scholar

page 200 note 2 Knorr, R., Die westpfälzischen Sigillata- Töpfereien von Blickweiler, etc., Textbild35.Google ScholarStanfield, J. A., ‘Unusual Forms of Terra Sigillata’, Arch. Journ. xxxvi, fig. 7, 35Google Scholar and fig.14, 65.

page 206 note 1 Knorr, R., ‘Terrasigillata der Zeit Vespasians in Rottweil und in Pompeji’ (Württembergische Vergangenheit), Textbild 2, 3.Google Scholar

page 206 note 2 Ibid., Textbild 4, 1.

page 206 note 3 Oswald, Felix, ‘Bowls byAcaunissa from Birdoswald, Mainz and Cologne’ “J.R.S., 1929), andGoogle Scholar‘Bowls of Acaunissa from the North of England’ (J.R.S., 1931),Google Scholar referred to above as AC. I and AC II respectively.

page 221 note 1 Sussex Arch. Coll., Ixxvii, 117, fig.3, 5.

page 221 note 2 Ibid., xxxv, 85, fig. 5.

page 221 note 3 Ibid., Ixxvi, 223.

page 227 note 1 See p. 188.