Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:14:52.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spherical Case of the Tūsī Couple

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

George Saliba  and
E. S. Kennedy
George Saliba
Affiliation:
Department of Middle East Languages and Cultures, 604 Kent Hall, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
E. S. Kennedy
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut, Lebanon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we study the development of the mathematical theorem, now known as the Tūsī Couple, and discuss the difference between its plane and spherical applications.

Dans cet article, nous étudions le développement du théorème mathématique, connu maintenant sous le nom de ‘couple d'al-Tūsī’; et nous discutons la différence entre son application plane et son application sphérique.

Type
Research Article
Information
Arabic Sciences and Philosophy , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , September 1991 , pp. 285 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ragep, F. Jamil, “The Two Versions of the Tūsī Couple,” in From Deferent to Equant: A Volume of Studies in the History of Science in the Ancient and Medieval Near East in Honor of E.S. Kennedy, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 500 (1987), pp. 329–56.Google Scholar

2 Saliba, George, “The Role of the Almagest Commentaries in Medieval Arabic Astronomy: A Preliminary Survey of Tūsī's Redaction of Ptolemy's Almagest,” Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, 37 (1987): 3–20.Google Scholar

3 Described in detail in Saliba, “The Role of the Almagest.”

4 Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī, Hall-i Mushkilāt-i Mu'īnīye, facsimile with introduction by Dānesh Pazẓūh, Dāneshgāh, Teheran, 1335 (1957).Google Scholar

5 See, for example, Kennedy, Edward S., “Late Medieval Planetary Theory,” Isis, 57 (1966): 365–378, p. 370,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Saliba, George, “The Astronomical Tradition of Maragha: A Historical Survey and Prospects for Future Research,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy: A Historical Journal, 1 (1991): 67–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī, al-Tadhkira, Leiden MS Or. 905, fol. 50v.Google Scholar

7 Especially in Qutb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, Nihāyat al-idrāk fī dirāyat al-aflāk, Istanbul, MS Köprülü 957, fol. 50v.

8 The work is described by El-Dallāl, Ahmad, The Astronomical Work of ṣadr al-Sharī'ah: An Islamic Response to Greek Astronomy, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Middle East Languages and Cultures, Columbia University, 1990, pp. 320–26.Google Scholar

9 Nizām al-Dīn Hasan b. Muhammad al-Nīsābūrī, (1310), Tawdīh al-Tadhkira, Cairo, Dār al-Kutub, MS Hay'a 66, p. 190.Google Scholar

10 Qutb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, Fa'altu fa-lā talum, Teheran, Majlis-i Shurāy-i Millī, MS 3944, fols. 68r–68v.Google Scholar

11 Al-Sharīf al-Jurjānī, Sharh; al-Tadhkira al-Nasīrīya, Cairo, Dār al-Kutub, MS Hay'a 103, p. 108.Google Scholar

12 Fathallāh Shīrvānī, Sharh al-Tadhkira, Istanbul, Topkapi Seray, MS Ahmad III 3314, fol. 246r.Google Scholar

13 Muhammad b. Ahmad Al-Khafrī, al-Takmila fi Sharh al-Tadhkira, India Office Library, MS Loth 747, fol. 169r.Google Scholar

14 ‘Abd al-'Alī b.Muhammad b. al-Husain Al-Birjandī, Sharh mukhtaṣar al-hay’a, Cambridge University Library, MS Add. 3589, fol. 170.Google Scholar