Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:15:02.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Point-source violations: split-beam tracking of fish at close range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2000

James J. Dawson
Affiliation:
BioSonics Inc., 4027 Leary Way NW, Seattle, WA 98107, USA
Daniel Wiggins
Affiliation:
BioSonics Inc., 4027 Leary Way NW, Seattle, WA 98107, USA
Donald Degan
Affiliation:
Aquacoustics Inc., 112 Charter Place, Mooresville, NC 28117, USA
Harold Geiger
Affiliation:
Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1255 West 8 Street, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526, USA
Deborah Hart
Affiliation:
Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1255 West 8 Street, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526, USA
Barbara Adams
Affiliation:
University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Department of Mathematics, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220 USA
Get access

Abstract

Split-beam positional estimates of fish detected in a river at close range often do not correspond to the actual position of the target. These inaccuracies create problems in determining whether a fish is moving upstream or downstream. We hypothesize that these positional estimates are degraded by two factors: size of target relative to beam diameter, and the complex scattering of the fish. These parameters create a near-field effect, within which the phase measurements of the returning echoes are corrupted. Examples of fish tracks from near and far range fish detected by a split-beam echo sounder are provided to illustrate these inaccuracies. Experimental data from tethered spheres and complex targets show increasing distortion with target complexity and proximity to the transducer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Elsevier, Inra, Ifremer, Cemagref, Ird, Cnrs, 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)