Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:45:27.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of short-time Artemia spp. feeding in larvae and different rearing environments in juveniles of common barbel (Barbus barbus) on their growth and survival under intensive controlled conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2007

Tomáš Policar ,
Pavel Kozák ,
Jitka Hamáčková ,
Andrea Lepičová ,
Jiří Musil  and
Jan Kouřil
Tomáš Policar
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Department of Aquaculture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Pavel Kozák
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Department of Aquaculture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Jitka Hamáčková
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Department of Aquaculture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Andrea Lepičová
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Department of Aquaculture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Jiří Musil
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Department of Aquaculture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Jan Kouřil
Affiliation:
University of South Bohemia, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Department of Aquaculture and Hydrobiology, Zátiší 728/II, 389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic
Get access

Abstract

The effect of short-time Artemia spp. feeding on growth performance and cumulative survival rate of barbel (Barbus barbus) larvae were studied under controlled aquaria conditions during the 21-day larval period. Three different diets (presenting reduced Artemia feeding) were tested for first exogenous nutrition of larvae (since 13 days post hatch): (1) artificial feed (Asta); (2) Artemia nauplii for 7 days followed by artificial feed; (3) Artemia nauplii for 14 days followed by artificial feed. The longer period of live food statistically improved growth of larvae (W = 174 ± 20 mg and SGR = 14.5 ± 0.5% d−1). The artificial dry food Asta without the addition of Artemia nauplii caused statistically decreased growth (W= 135 ± 22 mg and SGR= 13.1 ± 0.7% d−1). However, the growth of larvae with the short period of Artemia nauplii (W = 153 ± 25 mg and SGR = 13.8 ± 0.7% d−1) did not differ compared to either group. All used feeding diets did not have a significant effect on the cumulative survival rate of larvae ranging from 73 ± 1% to 74 ± 1% at the end of the larval rearing period.

The effects of the rearing environment on growth performance and survival rate of juveniles were tested under intensive controlled conditions in aquaria and troughs for 84 days following the larval period (from 34 to 118 dph). The environment of the troughs caused significantly decreased growth (W = 2079 ± 433 mg and SGR = 3.1 ± 0.05% d−1) of juveniles compared to ones reared in aquaria (W = 3236 ± 264 mg and SGR = 3.6 ± 0.1% d−1) at the end of the juvenile rearing period. Nevertheless, rearing environment did not have a significant influence on the cumulative survival rate of barbels (S C = 90 ± 4% and 81 ± 3% in aquaria and troughs, respectively).

Keywords

Barbus barbusLarval and juvenile rearingArtificial dry feedingArtemia naupliiDietRearing environment
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 175 - 183
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD, 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Billard, R., Cosson, J., Perchec, G., Linhart, O., 1995, Biology of sperm and artificial reproduction in carp. Aquaculture 129, 95-112. CrossRef
Dabrowski, K., 1984, Influence of initial weight during the change from live to compound feed on the survival and growth of four cyprinids. Aquaculture 40, 27-40. CrossRef
Fiala, J., Spurný, P., 2001, Intensive rearing of the common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) larvae using dry starter feeds and natural diet under controlled conditions. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 7, 320-326.
Hessen, D.O., Taugbøl, T., Fjeld, E., Skurdal, J., 1987, Egg development and lifecycle timing in the noble crayfish (Astacus astacus). Aquaculture 64, 77-82. CrossRef
Hofer R., 1985, Effects of artificial diets on the digestive processes of fish larvae. In: Cowey C.B., Mackie A.M., Bell J.G. (Eds.) Nutrition and feeding in fish. Academic Press, London.
Hoff F.H., Snell T.W., 1987, Plankton Culture Manual. Florida Aqua Frams, Inc., Dade City.
Jurajda, P., 1995, Effect of channelization and regulation on fish recruitment in a flood-plain river. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 10, 207-215. CrossRef
Kamler E., 1992, Early life history of fish. An energetics approach. Chapman and Hall, Fish and Fisheries Series 4.
Kamler, E., Urban-Jezierska, E., Stanny, L.A., Lewkowicz, M., Lewkowicz, S., 1987, Survival, development, growth, metabolism and feeding of carp larvae receiving zooplankton or starters. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 34, 503-541.
Kamler, E., Szlamiòska, M., Przybyl, A., Barska, B., Jakubas, M., Kuczyòski, M., Raciborski, K., 1990, Developmental response of carp larvae fed different foods or starved. Environ. Biol. Fish. 29, 303-313. CrossRef
Kolkovski, S., 2001, Digestive enzymes in fish larvae and juveniles – implications and applications to formulated diets. Aquaculture 200, 181-201. CrossRef
Keckeis, H., Schiemer, F., 1992, Food-consumption and growth of larvae and juveniles of 3 cyprinid species at different food levels. Environ. Biol. Fish. 33, 33-45. CrossRef
Killgore, K.J., Maynord, S.T., Chan, M.D., Morgan, R.P., 2001, Evaluation of propeller-induced mortality on early life stages of selected fish species. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21, 947-955. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRef
Krupka, I., 1988, Early development of the barbel Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758). Prace Ústavu rybárstva hydrobiol. Bratislava 6, 115-138.
Labatzki, P., Fuhrmann, B., 1992, Satzfischaufzucht der Flu $\beta $ barbe (Barbus barbus L.). Fortschr. Fischereiwiss. 10, 69-73.
Linhart, O., Rodina, M., Gela, D., Kocour, M., Vandeputte, M., 2005, Spermatozoal competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio): What is the primary determinant of competition success. Reproduction 130, 705-711. CrossRef
Lusk S., 1996, Development and Status of Populations of Barbus barbus in the Waters of the Czech Republic. Folia Zool. 45, (Suppl. 1), 39-46.
Lusk, S., Lusková, V., Halaèka, K., Šlechta, V., Šlechtová, V., 1998, Trends and production of a fish communities of the barbel zone. Folia Zool. 47 (Suppl. 1), 67-72.
Lusk, S., Hanel, L., Lusková, V., 2004, Red List of the ichthyofauna of the Czech Republic: Development and present status. Folia Zool. 53, 215-226.
Penczak, T., Kruk, A., 2000, Threatened obligatory riverine fishes in human-modified Polish rivers. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 9, 109-117. CrossRef
Penczak, T., Sierakowska, K., 2003, Anglers' records as a tool for assessing changes in fish populations. J. Appl. Aquac. 19, 250-254.
Peňáz, M., 1973, Embryonic development of the barb, Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758). Zoologické listy 22, 363-374.
Peňáz, M., Baruš, V., Prokeš, M., 1999, Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in a river used for energy production. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 15, 169-180. 3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRef
Philippart, J.C., 1982, Mise au point de l'alevinage contrôlé du barbeau Barbus barbus (L.) en Belgique. Perspectives pour le rempoissinnement des rivières. Cah. Ethol. Appl. 2, 173-202.
Philippart, J.C., Mélard, Ch., 1983, A first operation of restoring Belgian rivers with hatchery reared fry and fingerlings of the barbel, Barbus barbus, and the chub, Leuciscus leuciscus. Cah. Ethol. Appl. 3, 223-230.
Philippart J.C., Mélard Ch., Poncin P., 1989, Intensive culture of the common barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) for restocking. In: De Pauw N., Jaspers E., Ackefors H., Wilkins N. (Eds.) Aquaculture - a biotechnology in progress, Proc. Internat. Conf. Aquaculture Europe'87, 2-5 June 1987, Bredene, Belgium, Eur. Aquac. Soc., pp. 483-491.
Policar, T., Simon, V., Kozák, P., 2004, Egg incubation in the Noble crayfish (Astacus astacus L.): the effect of controlled laboratory and outdoor ambient condition on hatching success, growth and survival rate of juveniles. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 372-373, 411-423. CrossRef
Poncin, P., Mélard, Ch., Philippart, J., 1987, Use of temperature and photoperiod in the control of the reproduction of 3 European cyprinids: Barbus barbus (L.) Leuciscus cephalus (L.) and Tinca tinca (L.), reared in captivity. Preliminary results, Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 304, 1-12.
Poncin, P., 1989, Effects of different photoperiods on the reproduction of the barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) reared at constant temperature. J. Fish Biol. 35, 395-400. CrossRef
Pyka J., Bartel R., Szczerbowski J.A., Epler P., 2001, Reproduction of Gattan (Barbus xanthopterus Heckel), Shabbout (Barbus grypus Heckel) and Bunni (Barbus sharpeyi Gunther) and rearing stocking material of these species. Arch. Pol. Fish. 9, (Suppl.1), 235-246.
Rust M.B., 2002, Nutritional Physiology. In: Halver J.E., Hardy R.W. (Eds.) Fish Nutrition, Academic Press, pp. 367-452.
Sorgeloos, P., Dhert, P., Candreva, P., 2001, Use of the brine shrimp, Artemia spp., in marine fish larviculture. Aquaculture 200, 147-159. CrossRef
Taylor, A.A., Britton, J.R., Cowx, I.G., 2004, Does the stock density of stillwater catch and release fisheries affect the growth performance of introduced cultured barbel ? J. Fish Biol. 65 (Suppl. A), 308-313. CrossRef
Vilizzi, L., 2002, Modelling preference curves for the study of fish habitat use. Arch. Hydrobiol. 155, 615-626. CrossRef
Vilizzi, L., Copp, G.H., 2001, Behavioural responses of juvenile barbel in an artificial channel: distribution and velocity use. Anim. Behav. 61, 645-654. CrossRef
Wheeler, A., Jordan, D.R., 1990, The status of the barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), in the United Kingdom. J. Fish Biol. 37, 393-399. CrossRef
Wolnicki, J., Górny, W., 1995a, Survival and growth of larval and juvenile barbel (Barbus barbus L.) reared under controlled conditions. Aquaculture 129, 258-259. CrossRef
Wolnicki, J., Górny, W., 1995b, Suitability of two commercial dry diets for intensive rearing of larval tench (Tinca tinca L.) under controlled conditions. Aquaculture 129, 256-258. CrossRef
Wolnicki, J., Górny, W., 1995c, Controlled rearing of ide (Leuciscus leuciscus L) larvae using live food and dry feed. Aquaculture 129, 255-256. CrossRef
Wolnicki, J., 1996, Intensive rearing of larval and juvenile vimba, Vimba vimba (L.), fed natural and formulated diets. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 43, 447-454.