Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:44:46.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substitutes for live microalgae in mariculture: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 1997

René Robert
Affiliation:
IFREMER, Centre de Brest, Laboratoire de Physiologie des Invertébrés marins, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France
Pascal Trintignac
Affiliation:
SMIDAP, Syndicat Mixte pour le Développement Aquacole en pays de la Loire, Structure de Conseil Aquacole, 3 rue Célestin Freinet, Bât. B Sud, 44200 Nantes, France
Get access

Abstract

In mollusc hatcheries and nurseries, live microalgae are traditionally used as feed for bivalves. Despite recent improvements in efficiency, such intensive culture of microalgae represents major cost factors in the production of bivalve larvae and spat. In an attempt to provide cost-effective alternatives and to simplify hatchery-nursery procedures, non-living algal food has been developed over the past few years. Substitution products such as bacteria, yeast, vitamin or docosahexaenoic acid enriched powders, dry and concentrated microalgae and microcapsules have been tested and evaluated on an experimental scale. The present article reviews major research aimed at developing non living diets in mariculture, which generally resulted in lower growth and higher mortalities than that recorded for controls fed live microalgae. At the present time, concentrated and dried microalgae appear to be the best alternative products for bivalves, for juveniles essentially, while microcapsules provide an excellent research tool to study their nutritional requirements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© IFREMER-Elsevier, Paris 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)