Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:23:07.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Size heterogeneity prevails over kinship in shaping cannibalism among larvae of sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2005

Étienne Baras
Affiliation:
Department of Ethology and Animal Psychology, Aquaculture Research and Education Centre, University of Liège, 10, chemin de la Justice, 4500 Tihange, Belgium
Arsène Fortuné dAlmeida
Affiliation:
Laboratoire dhydrobiologie et daquaculture, Faculté des sciences agronomiques, Université nationale du Bénin, 01 BP 526, Cotonou, Benin
Get access

Abstract

Because preying on close relatives may cause a loss of inclusive fitness, cannibalistic animals are generally deemed to cannibalise non-related conspecifics preferentially to kins. Whether this basic principle also applies to fish exerting intracohort cannibalism at an early developmental stage is uncertain, and more intense cannibalism among mixed progenies might just be a consequence of greater size heterogeneity. To investigate this, progenies of sharptooth catfish of equivalent initial body weights but with contrasting size heterogeneity were reared separately or in mixed groups containing equal proportions of each progeny (27 ± 1°C, 12 h light:12 h night, 2.5 L aquaria, 100 or 200 fish·L–1). Cannibalism was monitored on a daily basis until the end of the larval stage (3–15 days after hatching). Cannibalism in mixed groups was intermediate between those in pure progenies, and was positively correlated (R2 = 0.803, P < 0.01) with initial size heterogeneity, irrespectively of fish origin. This finding does not exclude that catfish larvae were able to discriminate between siblings and non-related fish, but this obviously had very little influence on cannibalism. The implications of this finding are discussed, as they apply to prey selection in fast growing larvae, and aquaculture of catfish.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Elsevier, IRD, Inra, Ifremer, Cemagref, CNRS, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)