Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:15:06.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linking individual behaviour and migration success in Salmo salar smolts approaching a water withdrawal site: implications for management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

Jon C. Svendsen ,
Kim Aarestrup ,
Hans Malte ,
Uffe H. Thygesen ,
Henrik Baktoft ,
Anders Koed ,
Michael G. Deacon ,
K. Fiona Cubitt  and
R. Scott McKinley
Jon C. Svendsen*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Freshwater Fisheries, Denmark University of Copenhagen, Marine Biological Laboratory, Biological Institute, Denmark
Kim Aarestrup
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Freshwater Fisheries, Denmark
Hans Malte
Affiliation:
University of Aarhus, Department of Biological Sciences, Zoophysiology, Denmark
Uffe H. Thygesen
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Marine Fisheries, Denmark
Henrik Baktoft
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Freshwater Fisheries, Denmark
Anders Koed
Affiliation:
Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Freshwater Fisheries, Denmark
Michael G. Deacon
Affiliation:
Danish Ministry of the Environment, Ribe Environmental Centre, Water and Nature Division, Denmark
K. Fiona Cubitt
Affiliation:
CAER, University of British Columbia, Canada
R. Scott McKinley
Affiliation:
CAER, University of British Columbia, Canada
*
a Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Seaward migration of immature salmonids (smolts) may be associated with severe mortality in anthropogenically altered channels. Few studies however, have identified distinct behaviours that lead to exposure to adverse habitats or even unsuccessful migration. This study used high resolution telemetry to map migration routes of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts approaching a water withdrawal zone associated with an aquaculture facility in a lowland river. Individual smolts were tagged with an acoustic transmitter and released upstream of the water withdrawal zone. A trap was installed downstream of the water withdrawal zone. The trap captured all smolts that passed the water withdrawal zone. The tracking results confirmed previous studies on Pacific salmon showing that Atlantic salmon smolts may perform milling behaviours (i.e. upstream excursions and circular swimming behaviour) in anthropogenically altered channels. Non-milling and milling smolts were compared. Smolts performing milling behaviours covered a larger area (m2) and experienced an increased probability of entering the water withdrawal zone, considered an adverse habitat. Finally, smolts were identified as either passing (67%) or non-passing (33%) the water withdrawal zone based on the recapture data from the trap. In total, 20% of the non-passing smolts entered the aquaculture facility. Several behavioural traits differed between the remaining (80%) non-passing smolts and the passing smolts. In particular, time spent near the water withdrawal zone correlated negatively with the probability of passage. These links between individual behaviours and exposure to adverse habitats and passage probability may be applied to improve management of salmonid populations.

Keywords

Anadromous fishFish farmFish passageFisheriesHTIMigratory delaySalmonidaeTelemetry
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 201 - 209
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarestrup, K., Jepsen, N., 1998, Spawning migration of sea trout (Salmo trutta (L)) in a Danish river. Hydrobiologia 371/372, 275–281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarestrup, K., Koed, A., 2003, Survival of migrating sea trout (Salmo trutta) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts negotiating weirs in small Danish rivers. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 12, 169–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aarestrup, K., Jepsen, N., Koed, A., Pedersen, S., 2005, Movement and mortality of stocked brown trout in a stream. J. Fish Biol. 66, 721–728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostinho, A.A., Gomes, L.C., Fernandez, D.R., Suzuki, H.I., 2002, Efficiency of fish ladders for neotropical ichthyofauna. River Res. Applic. 18, 299–306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnekleiv, J.V., Rønning, L., 2004, Migratory patterns and return to the catch site of adult brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in a regulated river. River Res. Applic. 20, 929–942. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L.S., Haro, A., Castro-Santos, T., 2009, Three-dimensional movement of silver-phase American eels in the forebay of a small hydroelectric facility. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 58, 277–291. Google Scholar
Buchanan, R.A., Skalski, J.R., McMichael, G.A., 2009, Differentiating mortality from delayed migration in subyearling fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66, 2243–2255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cote, J., Fogarty, S., Weinersmith, K., Brodin, T., Sih, A., 2010, Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 277, 1571–1579. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier W.W., Kennedy G.J.A., 1993, Marine survival of wild and hatchery reared salmon (Salmo salar L.) from the river Bush, Northern Ireland. In Mills D.H. (Ed.). Salmon in the sea and the new enhancement strategies. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 139–162.
Davidsen, J., Svenning, M.-A., Orell, P., Yoccoz, N., Dempson, J.B., Niemelä, E., Klemetsen, A., Lamberg, A., Erkinaro, J., 2005, Spatial and temporal migration of wild Atlantic salmon smolts determined from a video camera array in the sub-arctic river Tana. Fish. Res. 74, 210–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, E.C., Gessel, M.H., Williams, J.G., 2009, Development of successful fish passage structures for downstream migrants requires knowledge of their behavioural response to accelerating flow. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66, 2109–2117. Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, J.E., Steig, T.W., 2002, A method for estimating the “position accuracy” of acoustic fish tags. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 140–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, J.E., Steig, T.W., 2003, Improved techniques for studying the temporal and spatial behavior of fish in a fixed location. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 700–706. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finstad, B., Økland, F., Thorstad, E.B., Bjorn, P.A., McKinley, R.S., 2005, Migration of hatchery- reared Atlantic salmon and wild anadromous brown trout post-smolts in a Norwegian fjord system. J. Fish Biol. 66, 86–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, P.C., Gilligan, D.M., Barwick, M., 2002, Changes in fish communities of the Shoalhaven River 20 years after construction of Tallowa Dam, Australia. River Res. Applic. 18, 265–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R.A., Nestler, J.M., Anderson, J.J., Weber, L.J., Loucks, D.P., 2006, Forecasting 3-D fish movement behavior using a Eulerian-Lagrangian-agent method (ELAM). Ecol. Model. 192, 197–223. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosset, C., Rives, J., Labonne, J., 2006, Effect of habitat fragmentation on spawning migration of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Ecol. Freshw. Fish 15, 247–254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M.M., Jensen, L.F., 2005, Sibship within samples of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and implications for supportive breeding. Conserv. Genet. 6, 297–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haro, A., Odeh, M., Noreika, J., Castro-Santos, T., 1998, Effect of water acceleration on downstream migratory behavior and passage of Atlantic salmon smolts and juvenile American shad at surface bypasses. T. Am. Fish. Soc. 127, 118–127. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heggenes, J., Røed, K.H., 2006, Do dams increase genetic diversity in brown trout (Salmo trutta)? Microgeographic differentiation in a fragmented river. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 15, 366–375. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoar W.S., 1988, The physiology of smolting salmonids. In Hoar W.S., Randall D.J. (Eds.). Fish Physiology, vol. 11. Academic Press, New York, pp. 275–343.
Hvidsten, N.A., Jensen, A.J., Rikardsen, A.H., Finstad, B., Aure, J., Stefansson, S., Fiske, P., Johnsen, B.O., 2009, Influence of sea temperature and initial marine feeding on survival of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar post-smolts from the Rivers Orkla and Hals, Norway. J. Fish Biol. 74, 1532–1548. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen B.O., Arnekleiv J.V., Asplin L., Barlaup B.T., Næsje T.F., Rosseland B.O., Saltveit S.J., Tvede A., 2011, Hydropower development – ecological effects. In Aa Ø., Einum S., Klemetsen A., Skurdal J. (Eds.). Atlantic salmon ecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp. 351–385.
Johnson, P.N., Bouchard, K., Goetz, F.A., 2005, Effectiveness of strobe lights for reducing juvenile salmonid entrainment into a navigation lock. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 25, 491–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S.L., Power, J.H., Wilson, D.R., Ray, J., 2010, A comparison of the survival and migratory behavior of hatchery-reared and naturally reared steelhead smolts in the Alsea River and estuary, Oregon, using acoustic telemetry. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 30, 55–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, B., Jonsson, N., 2004, Factors affecting marine production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 2369–2383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, N., Jonsson, B., Hansen, L.P., 1998, The relative role of density-dependent and density-independent survival in the life cycle of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 751–762. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, N., Jonsson, B., 2002, Migration of anadromous brown trout Salmo trutta in a Norwegian river. Freshw. Biol. 47, 1391–1401. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanno, Y., Vokoun, J.C., 2010, Evaluating effects of water withdrawals and impoundments on fish assemblages in southern New England streams, USA. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 17, 272–283. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P.S., Gessel, M.H., Williams, J.G., 2005, Seaward migrating subyearling Chinook salmon avoid overhead cover. J. Fish Biol. 67, 1381–1391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P.S., Williams, J.G., 2008, Response of migrating Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) smolts to in-stream structure associated with culverts. River Res. Applic. 24, 571–579. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P.S., Williams, J.G., 2009, Illumination influences the ability of migrating juvenile salmonids to pass a submerged experimental weir. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 18, 297–304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, P.S., O’Hanley, J.R., 2010, Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: a synthesis. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 17, 297–322. Google Scholar
Martel, G., Dill, L.M., 1995, Influence of movement by coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) parr on their detection by common mergansers (Mergus merganser). Ethology 99, 139–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, S.D., Hansen, L.P., Quinn, T.P., Saunders, R.L., 1998, Movement, migration, and smelting of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 77–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meldgaard, T., Nielsen, E.E., Loeschcke, V., 2003, Fragmentation by weirs in a riverine system: a study of genetic variation in time and space among populations of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) in a Danish river system. Conserv. Genet. 4, 735–747. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nams, V.O., 2006, Improving accuracy and precision in estimating fractal dimension of animal movement paths. Acta Biotheor. 54, 1–11. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestler, J.M., Goodwin, R.A., Smith, D.L., Anderson, J.J., Li, S., 2008, Optimum fish passage and guidance designs are based in the hydrogeomorphology of natural rivers. River Res. Applic. 24, 148–168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, C., Holdensgaard, G., Petersen, H.C., Björnsson, B.T., Madsen, S.S., 2001, Genetic differences in physiology, growth hormone levels and migratory behaviour of Atlantic salmon smolts. J. Fish Biol. 59, 28–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsèn, K.H., Petersson, E., Ragnarsson, B., Lundqvist, H., Jarvi, T., 2004, Downstream migration in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolt sibling groups. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61, 328–331. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, I.C., Greenberg, L.A., Eklov, A.G., 2001, Effect of an artificial pond on migrating brown trout smolts. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21, 498–506. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, D.L., Behnke, R.J., Gephard, S.R., McCormick, S.D., Reeves, G.H., 1998, Why aren’t there more Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 281–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosky, C.E., Schaller, H.A., 2010, Influence of river conditions during seaward migration and ocean conditions on survival rates of Snake River Chinook salmon and steelhead. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 19, 520–536. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumb, J.M., Perry, R.W., Adams, N.S., Rondorf, D.W., 2006, The effects of river impoundment and hatchery rearing on the migration behaviour of juvenile steelhead in the lower Snake River, Washington. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 26, 438–452. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, D.W., Hinch, S.G., 2010, Effectiveness monitoring of fish passage facilities: historical trends, geographic patterns and future directions. Fish Fish. 11, 12–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, J.W., 1960, The effect of impoundment on the population and movement of Atlantic salmon in Ellerslie Brook, Prince Edward Island. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 17, 453–473. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilt, C.R., 2007, Developing fish passage and protection at hydropower dams. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 104, 295–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semmens, B.X., 2008, Acoustically derived fine-scale behaviors of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) associated with intertidal benthic habitats in an estuary. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 65, 2053–2062. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrimpton, J.M., Björnsson, B.T., McCormick, S.D., 2000, Can Atlantic salmon smolt twice? Endocrine and biochemical changes during smolting. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 1969–1976. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.S., 1982, Decreased swimming performance as a necessary component of the smolt migration in salmon in the Columbia River. Aquaculture 28, 153–161. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonny, D., Knudsen, F.R., Enger, P.S., Kvernstuen, T., Sand, O., 2006, Reactions of cyprinids to infrasound in a lake and at the cooling water inlet of a nuclear power plant. J. Fish Biol. 69, 735–748. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, J.E.T., Davidsen, J.G., Jørgensen, E.H., Rikardsen, A.H., 2011, Seaward migrating Atlantic salmon smolts with low levels of gill Na + , K +  -ATPase activity; is sea entry delayed? Environ. Biol. Fishes. 90, 317–321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, J.C., Eskesen, A.O., Aarestrup, K., Koed, A., Jordan, A.D., 2007, Evidence for non- random spatial positioning of migrating smolts (Salmonidae) in a small lowland stream. Freshw. Biol. 52, 1147–1158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, J.C., Aarestrup, K., Deacon, M.G., Christensen, R.H.B., 2010, Effects of a surface oriented travelling screen and water abstraction practices on downstream migrating Salmonidae smolts in a lowland stream. River Res. Applic. 26, 353–361. Google Scholar
Thorstad, E.B, Økland, F., Finstad, B., Sivertsgard, R., Bjorn, P.A., McKinley, R.S., 2004, Migration speeds and orientation of Atlantic salmon and sea trout post-smolts in a Norwegian fjord system. Environ. Biol. Fish. 71, 305–311. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd C.D., Friedland K.D., MacLean J.C., Hazon N., Jensen A.J., 2011, Getting into hot water? Atlantic salmon responses to climate change in freshwater and marine environments. In Aa Ø., Einum S., Klemetsen A., Skurdal J. (Eds.). Atlantic salmon ecology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, pp. 409–443.
Unwin, M.J., Webb, M., Barker, R.J., Link, W.A., 2005, Quantifying production of salmon fry in an unscreened irrigation system: a case study on the Rangitata River, New Zealand. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 25, 619–634. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venditti, D.A., Rondorf, D.W., Kraut, J.M., 2000, Migratory behavior and forebay delay of radio-tagged juvenile fall Chinook salmon in a lower Snake River impoundment. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 20, 41–52. 2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welton, J.S., Beaumont, W.R.C., Clarke, R.T., 2002, The efficacy of air, sound and acoustic bubble screens in deflecting Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts in the River Frome, UK. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 9, 11–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, P.A., 1951, A trap for the capture of fish and other organisms moving downstream. T. Am. Fish. Soc. 80, 41–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabel, R.W., Faulkner, J., Smith, S.G., Anderson, J.J., Holmes, C.V., Beer, N., Iltis, S., Krinke, J., Fredricks, G., Bellerud, B., Sweet, J., Giorgi, A., 2008, Comprehensive passage (COMPASS) model: a model of downstream migration and survival of juvenile salmonids through a hydropower system. Hydrobiologia 609, 289–300. CrossRefGoogle Scholar