Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:29:13.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of time-area closure on tropical tuna purse-seine fleet dynamics through some fishery indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2011

Edgar Torres-Irineo ,
Daniel Gaertner ,
Alicia Delgado de Molina  and
Javier Ariz
Edgar Torres-Irineo
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR EME 212 (IRD, Ifremer et Université Montpellier 2), avenue Jean Monnet, BP 171, 34200 Sète Cedex, France
Daniel Gaertner*
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR EME 212 (IRD, Ifremer et Université Montpellier 2), avenue Jean Monnet, BP 171, 34200 Sète Cedex, France
Alicia Delgado de Molina
Affiliation:
IEO, Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Apdo. de Correos 1373, 38080 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Islas Canarias, España
Javier Ariz
Affiliation:
IEO, Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Apdo. de Correos 1373, 38080 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Islas Canarias, España
*
aCorresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Time-area closures have become a frequently used tool to control fishing effort and protect feeding and spawning areas. However, because time-area closure strata are mainly based on biological and ecological considerations, and do not accounts for fishermen’s behavior-at-sea, this type of regulation tool may not entirely achieve its objectives. With the aim of comparing the impact of two different time-area regulations: (1) a moratorium on Fish Aggregating Devices (FAD) sets (1997–2005) and (2) a no-take area for surface fleets (2005–2010) on the dynamics of the European (EU) tuna purse seine fleet operating in the eastern tropical Atlantic, several fishery indicators were evaluated through a Before-After, Control-Impact (BACI) approach. The results showed that prior to any regulation, the fleet used to be concentrated within the Gulf of Guinea area. During the first years of the moratorium on FAD (from November to January within a large region in the eastern Atlantic) there was a movement towards outside the protected area, increasing the total sets on FAD (restricted fishing activity). In general, this moratorium fulfilled its objectives; however, it was not respected during the last years of this regulation. The no-take time-area closure restricted all tuna catches for the surface fisheries but only in November and within a small area (i.e., the Picolo zone). As a result, there was an increase in activities on free schools outside the no-take area. Our findings suggest the use of some simple fishery indicators to understand fleet dynamics as a complement of ecological information before implementing new time area closures. Furthermore, since tunas are highly mobile species, anticipating the possible re-allocation of effort of purse seiners to adjacent areas in response to the spatial regulation is required to design different candidate time-area closures and to evaluate their effectiveness to protect juvenile tunas.

Keywords

Time-area closureFleet dynamicsTropical tunaFishery indicators
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 337 - 350
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agardy, T., Notarbartolo di Sciara, G.,Christie, P., 2011, Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 35, 226–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariz J., Gaertner D., 1999, A study of the causes of the increase in the catches of bigeye tuna by the European purse seine tuna fleets in the Atlantic Ocean. Program No 96/028, European Union, DG XIV, Bruxelles.
Ariz, J., Arrizabalaga, H., Artetxe, I., Delgado de Molina, A.,Moreno, G.,Pallarés, P.,Santana, J.C., 2001, Análisis del efecto de las moratorias llevadas a cabo por la flota de cerco española y asociada en el Océano Atlántico. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 52, 533–574. Google Scholar
Ariz, J., Delgado de Molina, A.,Pallarés, P.,Serralde, R.,Santana, J.C., 2005, Evolución de las capturas y del esfuerzo de la flota española de cerco tropical en el Océano Atlántico tras la aplicación de las moratorias voluntarias y la recomendación de CICAA sobre el establecimiento de una veda de zona y temporada al uso de dispositivos agregadores de peces. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 58, 372–384. Google Scholar
Ariz, J., Delgado de Molina, A.,Pianet, R.,Nordström, V., 2009, Some considerations on the effects of moratoria carried out by the European purse seine fleet in the Atlantic Ocean (ICCAT recommendations 98-01, 99-01 and 04-01). Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 64, 1234–1240. Google Scholar
Armsworth, P.R.,Block, B.A.,Eagle, J.,Roughgarden, J.E., 2010, The economic efficiency of a time – area closure to protect spawning bluefin tuna. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 36–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, T.A.,Hilborn, R.,Haynie, A.C.,Fay, G.,Flynn, L.,Griffiths, J.,Marshall, K.N.,Randall, J.K.,Scheuerell, J.M.,Ward, E.J.,Young, M., 2006, Fleet dynamics and fishermen behavior: lessons for fisheries managers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 1647–1668. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, E.N.,Mosqueira, I., 2006, Further analyses of time-area closures and their potential to reduce juvenile mortality of Atlantic tropical tunas. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 59, 536–545. Google Scholar
Cass-Calay, S.L.,Brooks, E.N.,Brown, C.A.,Scott, G.P., 2006, A possible framework for estimating the effect of the replacement of the FAD moratorium with a time-area closure on catches of Atlantic tropical tunas. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 59, 518–524. Google Scholar
De Bruyn, P., Murua, H., 2010, A potential framework for investigating the effects of moratoriums in the ICCAT region using standardised EU purse seine CPUE. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 65: 465–474. Google Scholar
Dinmore, T.A.,Duplisea, D.E.,Rackham, B.D.,Maxwell, D.L.,Jennings, S., 2003, Impact of a large-scale area closure on patterns of fishing disturbance and the consequences for benthic communities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 371–380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diouf, T.,Fonteneau, A.,Ariz, J., 1999, Analyse des effets du moratoire de la pêche sous objets flottants par les senneurs de l’Atlantique Tropical Est. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 49, 407–417. Google Scholar
Eberhardt, L.L.,Thomas, J.M., 1991, Designing environmental fields studies. Ecol. Monogr. 61, 53–73. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R.H.,McLain, D.R.,Bauer, R.A., 1981, Atlantic Skipjack Tuna: influences of mean environmental conditions on their vulnerability to surface fishing gear. Mar. Fish. Rev. 43, 1–11. Google Scholar
Fisher, J.A.D.,Frank, K.T., 2002, Changes in finfish community structure associated with an offshore fishery closed area on the Scotian Shelf. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 240, 249–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonteneau, A.,Ariz, J.,Gaertner, D.,Nordstrom, V.,Pallares, P., 2000, Observed changes in the species composition of tuna schools in the Gulf of Guinea between 1981 and 1999, in relation with the Fish Aggregating Device fishery. Aquat. Living Resour. 13, 253–257. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goujon, M.,Labaisse-Bodilis, C., 2000, Effets du plan de protection des thonidés de l’Atlantique 1998–1999 d’après les observations faites par les contrôleurs embarqués sur les thoniers senneurs gérés par les armements français. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 51, 651–669. Google Scholar
Goujon, M., 2004a, Effets du plan de protection des thonidés de l’Atlantique 2002–2003 d’après les observations faites sur le thoniers senneurs gérés par les armements français. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 56, 388–400. Google Scholar
Goujon, M., 2004b, Informations sur l’activité des thoniers senneurs et du supply français et sur les observations en mer d’après les données collectées pendant les plans de protection des thonidés de l’Atlantique 2000–2001, 2001–2002 et 2002–2003. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 56, 432–442. Google Scholar
Greenstreet, S.P.R.,Armstrong, E.,Mosegaard, H.,Jensen, H.,Gibb, I.M.,Fraser, H.M.,Scott, B.E.,Holland, G.J.,Sharples, J., 2006, Variation in the abundance of sandeels Ammodytes marinus off southeast Scotland: an evaluation of area-closure fisheries management and stock abundance assessment methods. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 63, 1530–1550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallier, J.P.,Gaertner, D., 2008, Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tunas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 353, 255–264. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, S.J.,Suter, J.M., 2007, The potential use of time-area closures to reduce catches of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean. Fish. Bull. 105, 49–61. Google Scholar
Hart, D.R., 2006, When do marine reserves increase fishery yield? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 1445–1449. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A.,Botsford, L.W., 2003, Comparing designs of marine reserves for fisheries and for biodiversity. Ecol. Appl. suppl. 13, S65–S70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiddink, J.G.,Hutton, T.,Jennings, S.,Kaiser, M.J., 2006, Predicting the effects of area closures and fishing effort restrictions on the production, biomass, and species richness of benthic invertebrate communities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 63, 822–830. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R.,Stokes, K.,Maguire, J.J.,Smith, A.,Botsford, L.W.,Mangel, M.,Orensanz, J.,Parma, A.,Rice, J.,Bell, J.,Cochrane, K.L.,Garcia, S.,Hall, S.J.,Kirkwood, G.P.,Sainsbury, K., 2004, When can marine reserves improve fisheries management? Ocean Coast. Manage. 47, 197–205. Google Scholar
Holland, D.S.,Brazee, R.J., 1996, Marine Reserves for Fisheries Management. Mar. Resour. Econ. 11, 157–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, D.S., 2003, Integrating spatial management measures into traditional fishery management systems: the case of the Georges Bank multispecies groundfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 915–929. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwood, J.W.,Nichols, J.H.,Milligan, S., 1998, Evaluation of closed areas for fish stock conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 893–903. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICCAT 2009, Evaluation of the effect of the closure contained in [Rec. 08-01] and alternative closures. In: Report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS) ICCAT, Madrid, pp. 175–176.
Jaworsky, A.,Solmundsson, J.,Ragnarsson, S.A., 2006, The effect of area closures on the demersal fish community off the east coast of Iceland. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 63, 897–911. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, O.P.,Ortega-Garcia, S.,Martell, S.J.D.,Ahrens, R.N.M.,Domeier, M.L.,Walters, C.J.,Kitchell, J.F., 2010, Local management of a “highly migratory species”: the effects of long-line closures and recreational catch-and-release for Baja California striped marlin fisheries. Prog. Oceanogr. 86, 176–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, R.E.,Freeman, M.M.R.,Hamilton, R.J., 2000, Ignore fishers’ knowledge and miss the boat. Fish Fish. 1, 257–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, M.J. 2005, Are marine protected areas a red herring or fisheries panacea? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 1194–1199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, J.B.,Tetreault, I.,Gaines, S.D.,Nisbet, R.M., 2007, Fishing the line near marine reserves in singles and multispecies fisheries. Ecol. Appl. 17, 1039–1054. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeQuesne, W.J.F.,Codling, E.A., 2009, Managing mobile species with MPAs: the effects of mobility, larval dispersal, and fishing mortality on closure size. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, 122–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln-Smith, M.P.,Pitt, K.A.,Bell, J.D.,Mapstone, B.D., 2006, Using impact assessment methods to determine the effects of a marine reserve on abundances and sizes of valuable tropical invertebrates. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 1251–1266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, L.R.,Grafton, R.Q.,Kompas, T.,Smith, A.D.M., 2010, Closure strategies as a tool for fisheries management in metapopulations subjected to catastrophic events. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 17, 346–355. Google Scholar
Menard, F.,Fonteneau, A.,Gaertner, D.,Nordstrom, V.,Stequert, B.,Marchal, E., 2000, Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an Eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 525–530. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murawsky, S.A.,Brown, R.,Lai, H.L.,Rago, P.J.,Hendrickson, L., 2000, Large-scale closed areas as a fishery-management tool in temperate marine systems: the Georges Bank experience. Bull. Mar. Sci. 66, 775–798. Google Scholar
Murawsky, S.A.,Wigley, S.E.,Fogarty, M.J.,Rago, P.J.,Mountain, D.G., 2005, Effort distribution and catch patterns adjacent to temperate MPAs. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 1150–1167. Google Scholar
Poos, J.J.,Rijnsdorp, A.D., 2007, An “experiment” on effort allocation of fishing vessels: the role of interference competition and area specialization. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 304–313. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers, J.E.,Abeare, S.M., 2009, Fishing effort redistribution in response to area closures. Fish. Res. 99, 216–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, E.D.,Luo, J.,Goodyear, P.C.,Hoolihan, J.P.,Snodgrass, D.,Orbesen, E.S.,Serafy, J.E.,Ortiz, M.,Schirripa, M.J., 2010, Ocean scale hypoxia-based habitat compression of Atlantic istiophorid billfishes. Fish. Oceanogr. 19, 448–462, CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, S.,Gaertner, D., 2004, The behavioural dynamics of fishers: management implications. Fish Fish. 5, 153–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchirico, J.N.,Malvadkar, U.,Hastings, A.,Wilen, J.E., 2006, When are no-take zones an economically optimal fishery management strategy? Ecol. Appl. 16, 1643–1659. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P.E., 1993, Impact assessment using the before-after-control-impact (BACI) model: concerns and comments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 627–637. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith E.P., 2002, BACI design. In: El-Shaarawi A.H., Piegorsch W.W. (Eds.), Vol. I, Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, pp. 141–148.
Smith, M.D.,Wilen, J.E., 2003, Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behavior. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 46, 183–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.D.,Grabowski, J.H.,Yund, P.O., 2008, The role of closed areas in rebuilding monkfish populations in the Gulf of Maine. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 1326–1333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefansson, G.,Rosenberg, A.A., 2005, Combining control measures for more effective management of fisheries under uncertainty: quotas, effort limitation and protected areas. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 360, 133–146. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, A.J., 1992, Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 161, 145–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J.A.,Keith, R.P., 1995, Analyzing the effects of accidental environmental impacts: approaches and assumptions. Ecol. Appl. 5, 1069–1083. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilen, J.E.,Smith, M.D.,Lockwood, D.,Botsford, L.W., 2002, Avoiding surprises: Incorporating fisherman behavior into management models. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70, 553–575. Google Scholar
Zacharias, M.A.,Gerber, L.R.,Hyrenbach, K.D., 2006, Review of the Southern Ocean Sanctuary: Marine protected areas in the context of the International Whaling Commission Sanctuary Program. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 8, 1–12.Google Scholar