Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:44:03.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choosing survey time series for populations as part of an ecosystem approach to fishery management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2009

Verena M. Trenkel  and
John Cotter
Verena M. Trenkel
Affiliation:
Ifremer, Département EMH, BP 21105, 44311 Nantes, France
John Cotter
Affiliation:
CEFAS Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
Get access

Abstract

Ecosystem assessments of fisheries based only on survey data will often have to use surveys that were designed historically for special purposes, e.g. for assessing abundances of two or three target species, or for tuning VPAs. An important question then is whether the previously collected data can provide informative time series of abundance indices and other state indicators for a wider range of target and non-target species. Some potential shortcomings of existing data series are treated in this paper leading to four questions which can guide the user to determine the suitability of an existing time series: did the survey cover the stock of each species adequately? Did survey catchability vary significantly between length or age classes? Did survey catchabilities vary significantly in space or time? Was the sampling effort sufficient? Simple methods for investigating these questions are proposed and illustrated with examples.

Keywords

IndicatorsSurvey-based methodsBias
Type
Research Article
Information
Aquatic Living Resources , Volume 22 , Issue 2: Fish Stock Assessments Using Surveys and Indicators , April 2009 , pp. 121 - 126
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beare D., Castro J., Cotter J., van Keeken O., Kell L., Mahé J.C., Moura O., Nielsen R., Piet G., Simmonds J., Skagen D., Sparre P., 2002, Evaluation of research surveys in relation to management advice (EVARES). Final report. FISH/2001/02 – Lot 1. DGXIV Fisheries, European Commission, Brussels. Available from [email protected]
Benoît, H.P., Swain, D.P., 2003, Accounting for length- and depth-dependent diel variation in catchability of fish and invertebrates in an annual bottom-trawl survey. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 1298–1317. CrossRef
Cotter, A.J.R., Mesnil, B., Piet, G.J., 2007, Estimating stock parameters from trawl cpue-at-age series using year-class curves. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 234–247. CrossRef
Cotter, J., Mesnil, B., Witthames, P., Parker-Humphreys, M., 2009, Notes on nine biological indicators estimable from trawl surveys with an illustrative assessment for North Sea cod. Aquat. Living Resour. 22, 135–153. CrossRef
Daan N., 2001, The IBTS database: a plea for quality control. ICES Annual Science Conference, ICES CM 2001/T:03.
Francis, R.I.C.C., Hurst, R.J., Renwick, J.A., 2003, Quantifying annual variation in catchability for commercial and research fishing. Fish. Bull. 101, 293–304.
Godø O.R., 1994, Factors affecting the reliability of groundfish abundance estimates from bottom trawl surveys. In: Fernö A., Olsen S. (eds.) Marine fish behaviour in capture and abundance estimation. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp. 166–197.
Heessen H.J.L., Dalskov J., Cook R.M., 1997, The International Bottom Trawl Survey in the North Sea, the Skagerrak and Kattegat. ICES CM 1997/Y:31.
ICES, 2004, Report of the workshop on survey design and data analysis (WKSAD).
ICES, 2006a, Report of the study group on survey trawl standardisation (SGSTS).ICES CM 2006/FTC:05.
ICES, 2006b, Working Group on the Assessment of Southern Shelf Stocks of Hake, Monk and Megrim.
ICES, 2007, Collection of acoustic data from fishing vessels. ICES Coop. Res. Rep. 287.
Massé, J., 1996, L'écho-intégration en halieutique : étude et suivi de la distribution et de l'abondance des stocks exploités. Oceanis 22, 23–38.
Mesnil, B., Cotter, A.J.R., Fryer, R.J., Needle, C.L., Trenkel, V.M., 2009, A review of fishery-independent assessment models, and initial evaluation based on simulated data. Aquat. Living Resour. 22, 207–216. CrossRef
Pelletier, D., 1998, Intercalibration of research survey vessels in fisheries: a review and an application. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 2672–2690. CrossRef
Poulard J.-C., Trenkel V.M. 2007. Do survey design and wind conditions influence survey indices? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 1551–1562.
Rochet, M.-J., Trenkel, V.M., Bellail, R., Coppin, F., Le Pape, O., Mahé, J.-C., Morin, J., Poulard, J.-C., Schlaich, I., Souplet, A., Vérin, Y., Bertrand, J., 2005, Combining indicator trends to assess ongoing changes in exploited fish communities: diagnostic of communities off the coasts of France. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 1647–1664. CrossRef
Rochet, M.J., Trenkel, V.M., 2003, Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60, 86–99. CrossRef
Swain D.P., Nielsen G.A., Sinclair A.F., Chouinard G.A. 1994, Changes in catchability of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) to an otter-trawl fishery and research survey in the southern Gulf of St Lawrence. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 51, 493–504.
Trenkel, V.M., Pinnegar, J.K., Rochet, M.J., Rackham, B., 2004, Different survey designs provide similar pictures of community structure but not of individual fish populations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 351–362. CrossRef
Trenkel, V.M. Rochet, M.J., Mesnil, B., 2007, From model-based prescriptive advice to indicator-based interactive advice. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 768-774. CrossRef
Woillez, M., Poulard, J.-C., Rivoirard, J., Petitgas, P., Bez, N., 2007, Indices for capturing spatial patterns and their evolution in time, with application to European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Bay of Biscay. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 537–550. CrossRef
Yoccoz, N.G., Nichols, J.D., Boulinier, T., 2001, Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 446–453. CrossRef