Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T22:23:37.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Word reading in Spanish: A comparison between skilled and less skilled beginning readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Angela Signorini
Angela Signorini*
Affiliation:
University of Buenos Aires
*
Angela Signorini, Instituto de Lingüistica, Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 25 de mayo 217, 1002 Buenos Aires, Argentina
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate word reading abilities in first and third grade Spanish-speaking children who were learning to read in Spanish; the performance of skilled and less skilled readers was compared across measures that assessed phonological recoding ability, knowledge of grapheme-phoneme correspondences, and phonemic awareness. The findings suggest that Spanish-speaking children relied on phonological recoding strategies in the process of becoming readers. First grade, less skilled readers seemed to depend on partial letter-sound knowledge. Furthermore, spelling-sound correspondences appeared to be the main source of information used by first grade, skilled readers and third grade, less skilled readers. The latter seemed to lag behind skilled readers in the use of word-specific information. The phonemic awareness tasks displayed moderate to low correlations with reading ability in the less skilled groups. It is argued that the simple phonological structure of Spanish and its shallow orthography lead to the phonological processing of letter strings during reading acquisition.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 1997 , pp. 319 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alliende, F., Condemarin, M., & Milicic, N. (1982). Prueba de Comprensión Lectora de Complejidad Lingüistica Progresiva. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Baron, J. (1979). Orthographic and word-specific knowledge in children's reading of words. Child Development, 50, 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 2, 386–393.Google Scholar
Boder, E. (1971). Developmental dyslexia: A diagnostic screening procedure based on three characteristic patterns of reading and spelling. In Bateman, B. (Ed.), Learning disorders. Seattle: Special Child Publications.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo Valdivieso, L., Bermeosolo, J., & Pinto, A. (1991). Dificultades del aprendizaje de la lectura y diferencias socioeconómicas. Anales de la Facultad de Educatión (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), 12, 69–88.Google Scholar
Bravo Valdivieso, L., Bermeosolo, J., & Pinto, A. (1992). Procesamiento auditivo-fonémico y comprensión lectora silenciosa en un grupo de dieléxicos. Revisia Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 24, 275–292.Google Scholar
Bravo Valdivieso, L., Bermeosolo, J., Pinto, A., Oyarzo, E., & Morales, M. (1990). Variables que predicen el resultado del tratamiento en disléxicos de niveles socioeconomicos diferentes. Revista Terapia Psicológica, 13, 42–46.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1988). The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. (1992). Studies in the acquisition procedure for reading: Rationale, hypotheses, and data. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Colombo, L., & Tabossi, P. (1992). Strategies and stress assignment: Evidence from a shallow orthography. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Cossú, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Katz, L., & Tola, G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1980). The development of orthographic images. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C, & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, A. E. (1990). Factors contributing to performance on phoneme awareness tasks in school-aged children. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-103/104, 137–152.Google Scholar
Freebody, P., & Byrne, B. (1988). Word-reading strategies in elementary school children: Relations to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, P. B., & Walsh, M. A. (1991). Chinese, Phoenicians, and the orthographic cipher of English. In Brady, S. A.Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grompone, M. A. C. (1975). Colonialismo y dislexia. In de Quirós, J. B., Schrager, O., & Feldman, J. (Eds.), El lenguaje lectoescritoy sus problemas. Buenos Aires: Panamericana.Google Scholar
Guirao, M., & Garcia Jurado, M. A. (1993). Estudo estadistico del español. Buenos Aires: CONICET, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Sensoriales.Google Scholar
Guirao, M., & Manrique, A. M. B. (1972). Fonemas, silabas y palabras del español de Buenos Aires. Filologia, 16, 135–165.Google Scholar
Guirao, M., & Manrique, A. M. B. (1975). Identification of Argentine Spanish vowels. Journal of Psycholinguislic Research, 4, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirao, M., & Manrique, A. M. B. (1979). Spectral modifications of Spanish vowels by consonantal context. Unpublished manuscript, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Sensoriales, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, J. L. (1981). Orthographic variations and visual processing. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-66, 119–165.Google Scholar
Jorm, A. F., & Share, D. L. (1983). An invited article: Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. G. (1984). Phonological recoding skills and learning to read: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenchner, O., Gerber, M. M., & Routh, D. K. (1990). Phonological awareness tasks as predictors of decoding ability: Beyond segmentation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G., & Shankweiler, D. (1980). Orthography and the beginning reader. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Venezky, R. (Eds.), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1989). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle (IARLD Monograph Series). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lukatela, G., Popadic, D., Ognjenovic, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research. SR-63/64, 227–242.Google Scholar
Manis, F. R., & Morrison, F. J. (1985). Reading disability: A deficit in rule learning? In Siegel, L. S. & Morrison, F. J. (Eds.), Cognitive development in atypical children. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Manrique, A. M. B. (1979). On the recognition of isolated Spanish vowels. In Hollien, H. P. (Ed.), Current issues in the phonetic sciences. Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar
Manrique, A. M. B. (1980). Manual defonetica acústica. Buenos Aires: Hachette.Google Scholar
Manrique, A. M. B. (1994). Alfabetización emergente: Diferencias socioculturales. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Manrique, A. M. B., & Signorini, A. (1994). Phonological awareness and reading and spelling abilities in Spanish-speaking children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. (1946). Estudios de fonologia española. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L. C., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33. 283–319.Google Scholar
Quirós, J. B., Schrager, O., & Feldman, J. (1975). El lenguaje lectoescrito y sus problemas. Buenos Aires: Panamericana.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez Bou, I. (1952). Recuenlo de vocabulario español. Rio Piedras: Universidad de Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sianovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. F., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38. 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., Nathan, R. G., & Zolman, J. E. (1988). The developmental lag hypothesis in reading: Longitudinal and matched reading level comparisons. Child Development, 59, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Cunningham, A. F. (1991). Beyond phonological processes: Print exposure and orthographic processing. In Brady, S. A. & Shankweiler, D. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (1984). Individual differences among children in spelling and reading styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunmer, W. E., & Nesdale, A. R. (1985). Phonemic segmenation skill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Bon, W. H. J., & Van Der Pijl, J. (1997). Effects of word length and wordlikeness on pseudoword repetition of poor and reading-level matched normal readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33. 321–363.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading aquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar