Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:05:07.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual processing of derivational morphology in children with developmental dyslexia: Insights from masked priming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2013

PAULINE QUÉMART  and
SÉVERINE CASALIS
PAULINE QUÉMART*
Affiliation:
University of Poitiers and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
SÉVERINE CASALIS
Affiliation:
University of Lille North of France
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Pauline Quémart, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (CeRCA)–CNRS UMR 7295, MSHS, Bâtiment A5, 5 rue Théodore Lefebvre, 86000 Poitiers, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated whether children with dyslexia rely on derivational morphology during visual word recognition and how the semantic and form properties of morphemes influence this processing. We conducted two masked priming experiments, in which we manipulated the semantic overlap (Experiment 1) and the form overlap (Experiment 2) between morphologically related pairs of words. In each experiment, French dyslexic readers as well as reading-level matched and chronological-age matched children performed a lexical decision task. Significant priming effects were observed in all groups, indicating that their lexicon is organized around morpheme units. Furthermore, the dyslexics’ processing of written morphology is mainly influenced by the semantic properties of morphemes, whereas children from the two control groups are mainly influenced by their form properties.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , March 2015 , pp. 345 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Assink, E. M., Van Bergen, F., Van Teeseling, H., & Knuijt, P. P. (2004). Semantic priming effects in normal versus poor readers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 67–79.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L. B., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A., & Scarpati, S. (1991). Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students. Brain & Language, 40, 471–490.Google Scholar
Bertrand, D., Fluss, J., Billard, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2010). Efficacité, sensibilité, spécificité: Comparaison de différents tests de lecture. L'Année Psychologique, 110, 299–320.Google Scholar
Betjemann, R. S., & Keenan, J. M. (2008). Phonological and semantic priming in children with reading disability. Child Development, 79, 1086–1102.Google Scholar
Beyersmann, E., Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2011). Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 937–942.Google Scholar
Bonifacci, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2008). Speed of information processing in children with dyslexia and children of low-IQ: A test of the modular hypothesis. Cognition, 107, 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnotte, I., & Casalis, S. (2010). Semantic priming in French children with varying comprehension skills. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, J. R., Perfetti, C. A., & MacWhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers. Developmental Psychology, 35, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruck, M. (1988). The word recognition and spelling of dyslexic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 51–69.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.Google Scholar
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108, 243–262.Google Scholar
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2003). The effects of morphological structure on children's reading of derived words in English. In Assink, E. & Sandra, D. (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 27–52). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C., & Katz, L. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249–274.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casalis, S., Dusautoir, M., Colé, P., & Ducrot, S. (2009). Morphological relationship to children word reading: A priming study in fourth graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 761–766.Google Scholar
Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of orthographic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 165–182.Google Scholar
Colé, P., Bouton, S., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2012). Stem and derivational-suffix processing during reading by French second and third graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 97–120.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2010). Bas du formulaire Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O'Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martin (2009). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 749–755.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–128.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 75–114.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 37, 895–908.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691–703.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171–208.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (2000). A small to large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 53, 1081–1104.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody, adaptation française. Toronto: Psycan.Google Scholar
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, A. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 31.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing in morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of the form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684–691.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Rueckl, J., DiLiberto, K., Pastizzo, M. J., & Vellutino, F. R. (2002). Morphological analysis by child readers as revealed by the fragment completion task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 529–535.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Soltano, E. G., Pastizzo, M. J., & Francis, S. E. (2004). What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing? Brain & Language, 90, 17–30.Google Scholar
Felton, R. H., Naylor, C. E., & Wood, F. B. (1990). Neuropsychological profile of adult dyslexics. Brain & Language, 39, 485–497.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1998). The pros and cons of masked priming. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 203–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, U. (1980). Unexpected spelling problems. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 495–515). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 421–444.Google Scholar
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 127–131.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, P. L., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). Prediction of exception word and nonword reading in dyslexic children: The severity hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 34–43.Google Scholar
Hatcher, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2002). The phonological representations hypothesis of dyslexia: From theory to practice. In Reid, G. & Wearmouth, J. (Eds.), Dyslexia and literacy: Theory and practice (pp. 69–83). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hennessey, N. W., Deadman, A., & Williams, C. (2011). Semantic effects on word naming in children with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 267–286.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (1992). Deficits in output phonology: An explanation of reading failure? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 47–72.Google Scholar
Hultquist, A. M. (1997). Orthographic processing abilities of adolescents with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 89–114.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.Google Scholar
Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l'Alouette. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Spelling errors and reading fluency in compensated adult dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leikin, M., & Zur Hagit, E. (2006). Morphological processing in adult dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 471–490.Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41.Google Scholar
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18, 313.Google Scholar
Lyon, G. R. (1995). Toward a definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27.Google Scholar
Marcolini, S., Traficante, D., Zoccolotti, C., & Burani, C. (2011). Word frequency modulates morpheme-based reading in poor and skilled Italian readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinus, A., & De Jong, P. (2010). Size does not matter, frequency does: Sensitivity to orthographic neighbors in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 129–144.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form, and meaning. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.Google Scholar
Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of word length on lexical decision in dyslexic children and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98, 140–149.Google Scholar
McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a “fete” in “fetish”? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C.-M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school in English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.Google Scholar
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Individual differences in contextual faciliation: Evidence from dyslexia and poor reading. Child Development, 69, 996–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661–677.Google Scholar
Nievas, F., & Justicia, F. (2004). A cross-sectional study about meaning access processes for homographs. Cognitive Development, 19, 95–109.Google Scholar
Peereman, R., Lété, B., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2007). Manulex-infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme–phoneme mappings, and infralexical and lexical units in child-directed written material. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 593–603.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385–413.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., McCabe, L. L., Smith, S. D., Lefly, D. L., Bookman, M. O., Kimberling, W. J., et al. (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. Child Development, 57, 1001–1013.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., Van Orden, G. C., Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., & Haith, M. M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1753–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical basis of comprehension skill. In Corfien, D. (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2011). The role of form and meaning in the processing of written morphology: A priming study in French developing readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 478–496.Google Scholar
Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Duncan, L. G. (2012). Exploring the role of bases and suffixes when reading familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence from French young readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 424–442.Google Scholar
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.Google Scholar
Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Study of Reading, 12, 221–252.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven manual: Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Raven manual: Coloured Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Rey-Debove, J. (Ed.). (2004). Le Robert Brio—Analyse comparative des mots. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.Google Scholar
Siegel, L. S., Share, D., & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics. Psychological Science, 6, 250–254.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. B., Lorsbach, T. C., & Whitehouse, D. (1983). Encoding and contextual components of word recognition in good and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 161–171.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia (Essays in developmental psychology). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive–compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Individual differences in the cognitive processes in reading: 1. Word decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 485–493.Google Scholar
Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C. (2011). How do roots and suffixes influence reading of pseudowords: A study of Italian children with and without dyslexia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 777–793.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.Google Scholar