Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:06:47.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valency, secondary frequency, and lexical access: A Japanese study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jun Yamada  and
Yuriko Kayamoto
Jun Yamada*
Affiliation:
Hiroshima University
Yuriko Kayamoto
Affiliation:
Hiroshima University
*
Faculty of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima, 739-0046, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the effect of valency (defined as the associative value that represents the number of two-kanji words containing in first or second position the first-positional kanji of the word) on the recognition of two-kanji words in Japanese. Lexical decisions were 24 ms faster for words in the high-valency condition than in the low-valency condition, but were 26 ms slower for nonwords in the high-valency condition than in the low-valency condition. While these results suggested a significant interaction between valency and wordness, a regression analysis indicated that the frequency and valency of the first constituent kanji are significant factors for word recognition, and that the frequency of the first constituent kanji is a significant factor for nonword recognition. The secondary-frequency effect hypothesis is put forth to explain the effects of valency and other variables on lexical decision time.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , January 1998 , pp. 87 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borowsky, R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22. 63–85.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12. 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Dornic, S. (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. 6, pp. 235–267). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memoryand Cognition, 4, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuzawa, S. (1976). Kanji no dokuji gakushuu [The learning of kanji]. Tokyo: Gakutosha.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 113, 256–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language. 29, 228–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grainger, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In Frost, R.Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 131–146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Japanese Language Institute. (1963). Cendai zasshi 90shu no yogo yoji [Uses of words and kanji in 90 modern journals]. Tokyo: Shuei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occur-rence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jastrzembski, J. E., & Stanners, R. F. (1975). Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 14, 634–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. F. (1992). On the role of cohorts or neighbors in visual word recognition. In Frost, R.Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 147–164). Amster-dam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, C. K., Cheng, P. W., & Mulcahy, R. (1987). Automatic processing of morphemic orthography by mature readers. Language and Speech, 30, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1991). The science of words. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Millis, M. L., Button, S. B. (1989). The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you dont. Memory and Cognition, 17, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C, Haggard, P. N. (1989). The effects of frequency on visual word recognition: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishio, M., Iwabuchi, E., & Mizutani, S. (1994). Iwanami kokugo jiten [The Iwanami Japanese dictionary] (5th ed.). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. D., & Yamada, J. (1978). Are whole word kanji easier to leam than syllable kana? Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wydell, T. N., Butterworth, B., & Patterson, K. E. (1995). The inconsistency of consistency effectsin reading: The case of Japanese kanji. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Mem-ory, and Cognition, 21, 1155–1168.Google Scholar
Zhang, B., & Peng, D. (1992). Decomposed storage in the Chinese lexicon. In Chen, H. C.Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 131–149). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar