Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T18:41:35.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of orthographic structure by deaf adults: Recognition of fingerspelled words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Vicki L. Hanson
Vicki L. Hanson*
Affiliation:
Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut
*
Vicki L. Hanson, Haskins Laboratories, 270 Crown Street, New Haven, CT 06510
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Deaf adults' access to English word structure was tested in a task requiring letter report for fingerspelled words, orthographically regular nonsense words (pseudowords), and orthographically irregular nonsense words (nonwords). Deaf subjects, like hearing subjects, were sensitive to orthographic structure as indicated by accuracy of letter report: Letters of words were reported most accurately, while letters of pseudowords were reported more accurately than letters of nonwords. Analysis of errors on letter reports revealed that deaf subjects tended to produce orthographically regular responses. These results provide clear evidence that deaf adults are able to make use of orthographic structure.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 343 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D. Working memory and reading. In Kolers, P. A., Wrolstad, M., & Bouma, H. (Eds.), Processing of visible language, Vol. 1. New York: Plenum, 1979.Google Scholar
Baron, J., & Thurston, I.An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 4, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, H.Reading the manual alphabet. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet College Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Carr, T. H., Davidson, B. J., & Hawkins, H. L.Perceptual Flexibility in word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978, 4, 674–690.Google Scholar
Conrad, R.The deaf school child. London: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar
Dodd, B. The spelling abilities of profoundly pre-lingually deaf children. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Dodd, B., & Hermelin, B.Phonological coding by the prelinguistically deaf. Perception and Psychophysics, 1977, 21, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doehring, D. G., & Rosenstein, J.Visual word recognition by deaf and hearing children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1960, 3, 320–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehri, L. C. The development of orthographic images. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S.The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1980, 1, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. W. Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to linguistic structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1980.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. J., Pick, A., Osser, H., & Hammond, M.The role of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in the perception of words. American Journal of Psychology, 1962, 75, 554–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. J., Shurcliff, A., & Yonas, A. Utilization of spelling patterns by deaf and hearing subjects. In Levin, H. & Williams, J. P. (Eds.), Basic studies in reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Hanson, V. L.Processing of visual and auditory words: Evidence for common coding. Memory and Cognition, 1981, 9, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, V. L. Short-term recall by deaf signers of American Sign Language: Implications of encoding strategy for order recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982, in press.Google Scholar
Hoemann, H. W., Andrews, C. E., Florian, V. A., Hoemann, S. A., & Jansema, C. J.The spelling proficiency of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 1976, 121, 489–493.Google ScholarPubMed
Kolers, P. A., & Katzman, M. T.Naming sequentially presented letters and words. Language and Speech 1966, 9, 84–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kučera, H., & Francis, W.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I.: Brown University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G., & Shankweiler, D. Orthography and the beginning reader. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Venezky, R. L. (Eds.), Orthography, reading, and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L.Phonemic effects in the silent reading of hearing and deaf children. Cognition, 1978, 6, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, M.Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, D. W., Venezky, R. L., & Taylor, G. A.Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979, 108, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L.Preliminary lexical identification in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976, 2, 80–91.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Gary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P.Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 1979, 7, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, E. B.Speed of reading when the span of letters is restricted. American Journal of Psychology, 1966, 79, 272–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reich, P. A. Visible distinctive features. In Makkai, A. & Makkai, V. B. (Eds.), The First LACUS Forum. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press, 1974, 348–356.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K.Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 546–554.Google Scholar
Shand, M. A.Sign-based short-term coding of American Sign Language signs and printed English words by congenially deaf signers. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. R.Residual hearing and speech production in deaf children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1975, 18, 759–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venezky, R.The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickelgren, W. A.Context-sensitive coding, associative memory, and serial order in (speech) behavior. Psychological Review. 1969, 76, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickelgren, W. A. Phonetic coding and serial order. In Carterette, E. C. & Friedman, M. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 7). Language and Speech. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Zakia, R. D. & Haber, R. N.Sequential letter and word recognition in deaf and hearing subjects. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar