Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:33:57.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spoken verb processing in Spanish: An analysis using a new online resource

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2009

SEMILLA M. RIVERA ,
ELIZABETH A. BATES ,
ARACELI OROZCO-FIGUEROA  and
NICOLE Y. Y. WICHA
SEMILLA M. RIVERA
Affiliation:
University of Texas at San Antonio and University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
ELIZABETH A. BATES
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego
ARACELI OROZCO-FIGUEROA
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego
NICOLE Y. Y. WICHA*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at San Antonio and University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Nicole Y. Y. Wicha, Department of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Verbs are one of the basic building blocks of grammar, yet few studies have examined the grammatical, morphological, and phonological factors contributing to lexical access and production of Spanish verb inflection. This report describes an online data set that incorporates psycholinguistic dimensions for 50 of the most common early-acquired Spanish verbs. Using this data set, predictors of response time (RT) from stimulus onset and mean differences at offset are examined. Native Spanish speakers, randomly assigned to one of two tasks, listened to prerecorded verbs and either repeated the verb (single word shadowing) or produced its corresponding pronoun. Factors such as stimulus duration, number of syllables, syllable stress position, and specific levels of initial phoneme facilitated both shadowing of a verb and production of its pronoun. Higher frequency verbs facilitated faster verb repetition, whereas verbs with alternative pronouns increased RT to pronoun production. Mean differences at offset (stimulus duration is removed) indicated that listeners begin speaking earlier when the verb is longer and multisyllabic compared to shorter, monosyllabic words. These results highlight the association between psycholinguistic factors and RT measures of verb processing, in particular, features unique to languages like Spanish, such as alternative pronoun and tense.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 29 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alameda, J. R., & Cuetos, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano (Vol. 2). Oviedo, Spain: University of Oviedo Press.Google Scholar
Alario, F. X., Costa, A., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Frequency effects in noun phrase production: Implication for models of lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 299–320.Google Scholar
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61.Google Scholar
Alvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 545–555.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P. J. L. (1999). Target-error resemblance in French word substitution speech errors and the mental lexicon. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 269–287.Google Scholar
Assadollahi, R., & Pulvermuller, F. (2003). Early influences of word length and frequency: A group study using MEG. NeuroReport, 14, 1183–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachoud-Levi, A.-C., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 331–346.Google Scholar
Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. NeuroReport, 15, 545–548.Google Scholar
Barde, L. H., Schwartz, M. F., & Boronat, C. B. (2006). Semantic weight and verb retrieval in aphasia. Brain and Language, 97, 266–278.Google Scholar
Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Szekely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., et al. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 344–380.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & D'Amico, S. (1999). Processing complex sentences: A cross-linguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 69–123.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernandez, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 992–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D'Amico, S., & Hernandez, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 847–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B. (2001). Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, E., & Liu, H. (1996). Cued shadowing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 577–581.Google Scholar
Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., & Price, T. R. (1991). Short-term memory and sentence comprehension. An investigation of a patient with crossed aphasia. Brain, 114 (Pt. 1A), 263–280.Google ScholarPubMed
Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 73–79.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature, 349, 788–790.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Orthographic neighborhood effects on visual word recognition in Spanish: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 857–871.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., and Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connine, C. M., Mullennix, J., Shernoff, E., & Yelen, J. (1990). Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1084–1096.Google Scholar
Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresti, E., & Moneglia, M. (Eds.). (2005). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken romance languages. Florence, Italy: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuetos, F., Alvarez, B., Gonzalez-Nosti, M., Meot, A., & Bonin, P. (2006). Determinants of lexical access in speech production: Role of word frequency and age of acquisition. Memory and Cognition, 34, 999–1010.Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., Bonin, P., Ramón Alameda, J., Chalard, M., & Caramazza, A. (2009). The specific-word frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from Spanish and French. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Cuetos, F., Ellis, A. W., & Alvarez, B. (1999). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 650–658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. (2001). Corpus of historical Spanish prose 1200–1900/Corpus del Español. Retrieved from http://www.corpusdelespanol.orgGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S., Bentrovato, S., & Bates, E. (2009). Processing inflected verbs in Italian. Unpublished manuscript. Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” and University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S., & Gentille, P. (1999). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian: A reaction time study. First Language, 19, 129–163.Google Scholar
Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S., Smith, S., Mimica, I., & Bates, E. (1998). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian and Serbo-Croatian: Local versus distributed cues. In Hillert, D. (Ed.), Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 345–377). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dopke, S. (1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German–English children. Journal of Child Language, 25, 555–584.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J. P., et al. (1993). MacArthur communicative development inventories: User's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
García-Pelayo y Gross, R., & Durand, M. (1976). Diccionario moderno: Español–Inglés, English–Spanish. New York: Ediciones Larousse.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1981). Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain Theory, 4, 161–178.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 603–609.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Effects of word length and frequency on the human event-related potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1090–1103.Google Scholar
Hillis, A. E., Tuffiash, E., & Caramazza, A. (2002). Modality-specific deterioration in naming verbs in nonfluent primary progressive aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1099–1108.Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Newton, T., Fenson, L., & Conboy, B. (2003). MacArthur Inventarios del Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas. User's guide and technical manual. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Jansma, B. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2004). Monitoring syllable boundaries during speech production. Brain and Language, 90, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juilland, A., & Chang-Rodríguez, E. (1964). Frequency dictionary of Spanish words. La Haya, Spain: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis: A practical guide for clinicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostic, A., & Haveka, J. (2002). Processing of verb tense. Psihologija, 35, 299–316.Google Scholar
Labelle, M., Godard, L., & Longtin, C. M. (2002). Grammatical and situational aspect in French: A developmental study. Journal of Child Language, 29, 301–326.Google Scholar
Laudanna, A., & Voghera, M. (2002). Nouns and verbs as grammatical classes in the lexicon. Rivista di Linguistica, 14, 9–26.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavior and Brain Science, 22, 1–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linares, R. E., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Stem allomorphy in the Spanish mental lexicon: Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments. Brain and Language, 97, 110–120.Google Scholar
Lukatela, G., Kostic, A., Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns. Memory and Cognition, 11, 59–63.Google Scholar
Mackay, A. I., Connor, L. T., Albert, M. L., & Obler, L. K. (2002). Noun and verb retrieval in healthy aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society, 8, 764–770.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150.Google Scholar
Marini, A., Boewe, A., Caltagirone, C., & Carlomagno, S. (2005). Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 439–463.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25, 71–102.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., & Duggan, G. B. (2003). Age of acquisition, ageing, and verb production: Normative and experimental data. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 56, 705–730.Google Scholar
Navarrete, E., Basagni, B., Alario, F. X., & Costa, A. (2006). Does word frequency affect lexical selection in speech production? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1681–1690.Google Scholar
Negro, I., Chanquoy, L., Fayol, M., & Louis-Sidney, M. (2005). Subject–verb agreement in children and adults: Serial or hierarchical processing? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 233–258.Google Scholar
Odberg, T., Jakobsen, J. E., Hultgren, S. J., & Halseide, R. (2001). The impact of glaucoma on the quality of life of patients in Norway. II. Patient response correlated to objective data. Acta Ophthalmology Scandinavica, 79, 121–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Rourke, T. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (2002). Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing. Biological Psychology, 60, 121–150.Google Scholar
Pechmann, T., Reetz, H., & Zerbst, D. (1989). The unreliability of voice key measurements. Sprache & Kognition, 8, 65–71.Google Scholar
Peers, E. A. (Ed.). (1968). Cassell's Spanish–English, English–Spanish dictionary (6th ed.). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 134–144.Google Scholar
Persson, J., Sylvester, C. Y., Nelson, J. K., Welsh, K. M., Jonides, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2004). Selection requirements during verb generation: Differential recruitment in older and younger adults. NeuroImage, 23, 1382–1390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillai, J. J., Araque, J. M., Allison, J. D., Sethuraman, S., Loring, D. W., Thiruvaiyaru, D., et al. (2003). Functional MRI study of semantic and phonological language processing in bilingual subjects: Preliminary findings. NeuroImage, 19, 565–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K., & Bandelow, S. (2006). Stochastic approaches to understanding dissociations in inflectional morphology. Brain and Language, 98, 194–209.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N. (1999). Slips of the tongue: Speech errors in first and second production. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prado, E. L., & Ullman, M. T. (2009). Can imageability help us draw the line between storage and composition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 110, 849–866.Google Scholar
Pynte, J., & Kennedy, A. (2006). An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research, 46, 3786–3791.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 307–314.Google Scholar
Schiller, N. O., Jansma, B. M., Peters, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2006). Monitoring metrical stress in polysyllabic words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 112–140.Google Scholar
Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M., & Cuetos, F. (2000). LEXESP: Informatizado del Español [LEXESP: A computerized database of Spanish]. Barcelona: Ediciones de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Sonnenstuhl, I., Eisenbeiss, S., & Clahsen, H. (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition, 72, 203–236.Google Scholar
Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8, 411–416.Google Scholar
Spieler, D. H., & Balota, D. A. (2000). Factors influencing word naming in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 15, 225–231.Google Scholar
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., & Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 399–412.Google Scholar
Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., et al. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 247–250.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 124, 107–136.Google Scholar
Tyler, M. D., Tyler, L., & Burnham, D. K. (2005). The delayed trigger voice key: An improved analogue voice key for psycholinguistic research. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 139–147.Google Scholar
Vossen, O. (1998). Eurowordnet: A multilingual database with lexical semantic networks. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311–334.Google Scholar