Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:18:00.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sentence repetition as a marker of language skills in children with dyslexia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2013

KRISTINA MOLL*
Affiliation:
University of York
CHARLES HULME
Affiliation:
University College London
SONALI NAG
Affiliation:
University of York
MARGARET J. SNOWLING
Affiliation:
University of York
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Kristina Moll, Department of Psychology, Karl-Franzens University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study investigated the role of length and complexity on sentence repetition in children with dyslexia and typical readers. Length and complexity each had independent effects on sentence repetition, and children with dyslexia performed more poorly than typical readers. This group effect was attributable to individual differences in language rather than memory skills. Error analyses revealed that content words (specifically adjectives) were more likely to be omitted in longer than in shorter sentences independent of complexity. In complex sentences, function words (specifically prepositions) were the most vulnerable to errors, particularly for a subgroup of children with dyslexia who had oral language difficulties. It is proposed that deficits in sentence repetition are indicative of language difficulties in children with dyslexia.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 5068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, D. J., MacDonald, M. C., & Postle, B. R. (2011). The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37, 4459.Google Scholar
Acheson, D. J., Postle, B. R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). The interaction of concreteness and phonological similarity in verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition, 36, 1736.Google Scholar
Adams, A.-M., & Gathercole, S. E. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 35, 95116.Google Scholar
Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 6488.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390412.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database [CD]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The Children's Communication Checklist version 2 (CCC-2). London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., North, T., & Donlan, C. (1996). Nonword repetition as a behavioural marker of inherited language impairment: Evidence from a twin study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 391403.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858886.Google Scholar
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chiat, S. (2001). Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: Premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 113142.Google Scholar
Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2008). Early phonological and sociocognitive skills as predictors of later language and social communication outcomes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 635645.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 741748.Google Scholar
Dollaghan, C., & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 11361146.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. A. (1991). The metrical basis for children's subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 431451.Google Scholar
Gould, T. D., & Gottesman, I. I. (2006). Psychiatric endophenotypes and the development of valid animal models. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5, 113119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagoort, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2009). The speaking brain. Science, 326, 372373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 1346413471.Google Scholar
Lieven, E. (2008). Building language competence in first language acquisition. European Review, 16, 445456.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 3554.Google Scholar
McDougall, S., Hulme, C., Ellis, A. W., & Monk, A. (1994). Learning to read: The role of short-term memory and phonological skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 112123.Google Scholar
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2010). Serial and free recall in children can be improved by training: Evidence for the importance of phonological and semantic representations in immediate memory tasks. Psychological Science, 21, 16941700.Google Scholar
Newcomer, P. L., & Hammill, D. D. (2005). Test of Language Development—Primary and Intermediate, fourth edition (TOLD-4). San Antonio, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Pearson Clinical. (2005). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test—Second UK Edition (WIAT-IIUK). Retrieved from http://www.pearsonclinical.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Pickering, S., & Gathercole, S. (2001). Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C). London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Plaza, M., Cohen, H., & Chevrie-Muller, C. (2002). Oral language deficits in dyslexic children: Weaknesses in working memory and verbal planning. Brain and Cognition, 48, 505512.Google Scholar
Psychological Corporation (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Seeff-Gabriel, B., Chiat, S., & Roy, P. (2008). Early Repetition Battery (ERB). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Shankweiler, D., & Crain, S. (1986). Language mechanisms and reading disorder: A modular approach. Cognition, 24, 139168.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (2003). Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: Individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Development, 74, 358373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stothard, S. E., Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., Chipchase, B. B., & Kaplan, C. A. (1998). Language-impaired preschoolers: A follow-up into adolescence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 407418.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103, 761772.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., Secord, W., Semel, E., Rust, J., Golombok, S., & Lycett, E. (2006). The manual of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, forth UK edition (CELF-IVUK). London: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Wilsenach, C. (2006). Syntactic processing in developmental dyslexia and in specific language impairment. LOT Dissertation Series. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar