Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:32:01.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The representation and processing of tone in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from slips of the tongue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

Jenn-Yeu Chen
Jenn-Yeu Chen*
Affiliation:
National Chung-Cheng University
*
Jenn-Yeu Chen, Department of Psychology, National Chung-Cheng University, 160 San Hsing, Min Hsiung, Chia Yi 621, Taiwan, R.O.C. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The issue of how tones are represented and processed when speaking Mandarin Chinese was examined via naturalistic slips of the tongue. The slips were collected from tape-recorded radio call-in programs over a period of one year. One research assistant listened to the programs twice, and another listened to them a third time independently. All the errors judged to be slips by the assistants were reviewed by the author. A total of 987 slips were confirmed and classified according to the system of Garnham, Shillcock, Brown, Mill, and Cutler (1982). With respect to the sound movement errors, it was found that, although errors of segmental phonemes were fairly common, errors of tones were rare. Moreover, the error pattern of the tones was different from that of the segmental phonemes. The relative immunity of tone to production errors is similar to the problem of stress in English. It is suggested that lexical tones in Mandarin Chinese are represented and processed differently than segmental sounds but similarly to lexical stress in English. These characteristics of the Mandarin tones relative to the segmental sounds are described in a model of phonological encoding for a single word, adapted from Levelt (1989).

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 289 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, J.-Y. (1996, April). A study of slips of the tongue in Chinese: Methods and some preliminary observations. Presented at the Chang Chao-Ting Memorial Conference: Progress in Cognitive and Life Sciences, Min-Hsiung, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y. (1997a, September). Some methodological problems in the study of speech errors in Chinese. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Chinese Psychological Association, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-Y. (1997b, April). Syllable errors from naturalistic slips of the tongue in Chinese. Presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1982). The reliability of speech error data. In Cutler, A. (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 7–28). Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fay, D. (1982). Substitutions and splices: A study of sentence blends. In Cutler, A. (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 163–195). Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1980). Introduction. In Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. (1977). Counterfeit tones in the speech of southern Thai bidialectals. Lingua, 41, 125–143.Google Scholar
Garnham, A., Shillcock, R. C., Brown, G. A., Mill, A. I. D., & Cutler, A. (1982). Slips of the tongue in the London–Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. In Cutler, A. (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 251–263). Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. (1976). An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 23–68.Google Scholar
Leben, W. R. (1978). The representation of tone. In Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 177–219). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moser, D. (1991). Slips of the tongue and pen in Chinese. (Sino-Platonic Papers, No. 22). Department of Oriental Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Shen, J.-X. (1992). Examples and categorization of slips of the tongue in Chinese. Chinese Language, 4, 306–316.Google Scholar
Shen, J.-X. (1993). Slips of the tongue and the syllable structure of Mandarin Chinese. In Yau, Shun-Chiu (Ed.), Essays on the Chinese language by contemporary Chinese scholars (pp. 139–161). Paris: Centre de Recherdches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale–Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Wan, I.-P. (1997). Tone errors in Mandarin Chinese. Master’s thesis, State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar