Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:29:45.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship of form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig
Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Department of Linguistics, Memorial Hall 313, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The task of all language learners is to match form and meaning. This study investigates the associations of form and meaning in the developing tense and aspect systems of adult learners of English as a second language. A cross-sectional study of 135 learners at six levels of proficiency was conducted using a cloze passage and compositions on the same topic. The interlanguage tense and aspect systems can be characterized as showing high formal accuracy, but relatively lower appropriate use across all levels. During the period when appropriate use lags behind formal accuracy, learners seem to associate form and meaning through alternative interim hypotheses related to lexical aspect and discourse function.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 253 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. (1986). El desarollo de la morfología verbal en el español como segundo idioma. In Meisel, J. M. (Ed.), Adquisición de languaje/Aquisicao da linguagem (pp. 115–138). Frankfurt: Vervuert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquisition. In Ferguson, C. A. & Huebner, T. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F., & Miller, R. (1976). How children talk about what happened. Journal of Child Language, 3, 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, N. (1987). The importance of meaning over form in second language system building: An unresolved issue. Unpublished PhD thesis, Graduate Center, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Bailey, N. (1989). Discourse conditioned tense variation. In Einsenstein, M. R. (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation (pp. 279–296). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1975). Dynamics of a Creole system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Bronckart, J-P., & Sinclair, H. (1973). Time, tense and aspect. Cognition, 2, 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coenen, J. (1988). The acquisition of Dutch. In Perdue, C. & Klein, W. (Eds.), Utterance structure (Final Report to the European Science Foundation, Vol. 6, pp. 178–233). (Available from the Max-Planck Institute)Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1982). Tense-aspect modality: The creole prototype and beyond. In Hopper, P. (Ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics (pp. 115–163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradman, H. L., & Hanania, E. (1990). Discrete focus vs. global tests: Performance on selected verb structures. In Jong, J. H. A. L. de & Stevenson, D. K. (Eds.), Individualizing the assessment of language abilities (pp. 166–176). Avon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Harlig, J. (1989). The interaction of verbal aspect and noun phrase determination in Hungarian. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Givón, T. (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Huebner, T., Perdue, C., & Carroll, M. (1988). The acquisition of English. In Perdue, C. & Klein, W. (Eds.), Utterance structure (Final Report to the European Science Foundation, Vol. 6, pp. 36–136). (Available from the Max-Planck Institute)Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. A. (1987). Developmental patterns of past tense acquisition among foreign language learners of French. In VanPatten, B., Dvorak, T. R., & Lee, J. F. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 52–60). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1986). Second language acquisition (rev. ed., Bohuslaw, Jankowski, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumpf, L. (1984). Temporal systems and universality in interlanguage: A case study. In Eckman, F., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (Eds.), Universals of second language acquisition (pp. 132–143). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. (1983). Developmental and instructional sequences. In Seliger, H. W. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Classroom oriented research (pp. 217–245). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. (1987). Classroom language as input to second language acquisition. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 169–187). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural language acquisition. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 206–224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Ohlstain, E. (1979). The acquisition of the English progressive: A case study of a seven-year-old Hebrew speaker. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 18, 81–102.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, R. (1990). The primacy of aspect: Aspectual marking in English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1987). The expression of temporality in basilang speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D., & Aksu, A. A. (1982). Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. In Hopper, P. (Ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trévise, A. (1987). Toward an analysis of the (inter)language activity of referring to time in narratives. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 225–251). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Verbs and times. In Vendler, Z. (Ed.), Linguistics and philosophy (pp. 97–121). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. (Reprinted from Philosophical Review, 66, 1957, 143–160)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Véronique, D. (1987). Reference to past events and actions in narratives in L2: Insights from North African Learners' French. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 252–272). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
von, Stutterheim C., & Klein, W. (1987). A concept-oriented approach to second language studies. In Pfaff, C. W. (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 191–205). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Wagner-Gough, J. (1975). Comparative studies in second language acquisition. CAL-ERIC/ CLL Series on Languages and Linguistics, 26. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 107 157)Google Scholar
Weist, R. M., Wysocka, H., Witkowska-Stadnik, K., Buczowska, E., & Konieczna, E. (1984). The defective tense hypothesis: On the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish. Journal of Child Language, 11, 347–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfson, N. (1979). The conversational historical present alternation. Language, 55, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar