Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:01:47.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The production of passives by children with specific language impairment: Acquiring English or Cantonese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2006

LAURENCE B. LEONARD ,
ANITA M.-Y. WONG ,
PATRICIA DEEVY ,
STEPHANIE F. STOKES  and
PAUL FLETCHER
LAURENCE B. LEONARD
Affiliation:
Purdue University
ANITA M.-Y. WONG
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
PATRICIA DEEVY
Affiliation:
Purdue University
STEPHANIE F. STOKES
Affiliation:
University of Reading
PAUL FLETCHER
Affiliation:
University College, Cork
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The production of passive sentences by children with specific language impairment (SLI) was studied in two languages, English and Cantonese. In both languages, the word order required for passive sentences differs from the word order used for active sentences. However, English and Cantonese passive sentences are quite different in other respects. We found that English-speaking children with SLI were less proficient than both same-age and younger typically developing peers in the use of passives, although difficulty could not be attributed to word order or a reliance on active sentences. Cantonese-speaking children with SLI proved less capable than same-age peers in their use of passive sentences but at least as proficient as younger peers. The implications of these cross-linguistic differences are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 267 - 299
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop D. 1979. Comprehension in developmental language disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 21, 225– 238.Google Scholar
Burgemeister B., Blum L., & Lorge I.1972. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Cohen J.1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crain S., & Thornton R.1998. Investigations in universal grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crain S., Thornton R., & Murasugi K.(November, 1987). Capturing the elusive passive. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
Fletcher P., Leonard L., Stokes S., & Wong A. M.-Y.2005. The expression of aspect in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 621– 634.Google Scholar
Fox D., & Grodzinsky Y.1998. Children's passive: A view from the by-phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 311– 332.Google Scholar
Guasti M. T.2002. Language acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haegeman L. 1985. The get-passive and Burzio's generalization. Lingua, 66, 53– 77.Google Scholar
Klee T., Stokes S., Wong A. M.-Y., Fletcher P., & Gavin W.2004. Utterance length and lexical diversity in Cantonese-speaking children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1396– 1410.Google Scholar
Leiter R. G.1979. Leiter International Performance Scale. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
Leonard L. 1989. Language learnability and specific language impairment in children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 179– 202.Google Scholar
Leonard L.1998. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leonard L., Deevy P., Miller C., Rauf L., Charest M., & Kurtz R.2003. Surface forms and grammatical functions: Past tense and passive participle use by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 43– 55.Google Scholar
Leonard L., Eyer J., Bedore L., & Grela B.1997. Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 741– 752.Google Scholar
Leonard L., Miller C., & Gerber E.1999. Grammatical morphology and the lexicon in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 678– 689.Google Scholar
Leonard L., Miller C., Grela B., Holland A., Gerber E., & Petucci M.2000. Production operations contribute to the grammatical morpheme limitations of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 362– 378.Google Scholar
Li Y.-H. A.1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
1994. Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. The LSHK Cantonese romanization scheme. Hong Kong: Author.
Manzini R., & Rousseou A.2000. A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua, 110, 409– 447.Google Scholar
Matthews S., & Yip V.1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
McBride C., Tardif T., Fletcher F., Shu H., & Wong A. M.-Y.2004. Developmental precursors to early literacy in Chinese children [Research grant]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Research Grants Council.
Redmond S. 2003. Children's productions of the affix -ed in past tense and past participle contexts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1095– 1109.Google Scholar
Reynell J., & Gruber C.1990. Reynell Developmental Language Scales, U. S. Edition. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Reynell J., & Huntley M.1987. Reynell Developmental Language Scales, Cantonese Version. Windsor: NEFR-Nelson.
Roid G., & Miller L.1997. Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.
Schütze C., & Wexler K.(November, 2000). An elicitation study of young children's knowledge of tense. In S. Howell, S. Fish, & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proc. of the 24th Annual Boston University Conf. on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 669– 683). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Stokes S.2002. Lexical and morphological diversity in children with SLI: Evidence in support of an optionality constraint. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the International Association for the Study of Child Language and the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.
van der Lely H. 1994. Canonical linking rules: Forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. Cognition, 51, 29– 72.Google Scholar
van der Lely H. 1996. Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive interpretation. Lingua, 98, 243– 272.Google Scholar
van der Lely H. 1998. SLI in children: Movement, economy, and deficits in the computational-syntactic system. Language Acquisition, 7, 161– 192.Google Scholar
Watkins R., & Rice M.1991. Verb particle and preposition acquisition in language-impaired preschoolers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1130– 1141.Google Scholar
Werner E., & Kresheck J.1983a. Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test—II. DeKalb, IL: Janelle.
Werner E., & Kresheck J.1983b. Structured Photographic Expressive Language Test—Preschool. DeKalb, IL: Janelle.
Wong A. M.-Y., Leonard L., Fletcher P., & Stokes S.2004. Questions without movement: A study of Cantonese-speaking children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1440– 1453.Google Scholar