Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:40:43.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological awareness in multilingual Chinese children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Susan J. Rickard Liow  and
Kenneth K. L. Poon
Susan J. Rickard Liow*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Kenneth K. L. Poon
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
*
Department of Social Work and Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore119260. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phonological awareness has been shown to be important for early literacy development in unilingual readers of English. We investigated its impact in English and Mandarin for 57 multilingual pupils whose language backgrounds were English, Chinese (Mandarin/dialect), or Bahasa Indonesia, using a homophone decision task, an English lexicality spelling test, and a Hanyu Pinyin (romanised Mandarin) spelling test. All three groups of pupils were studying English and Mandarin in the same school, and so, somewhat unusually, the influence of their language background (especially script exposure) could be seen in the absence of differences in teaching strategies. In English, the results showed that a relationship between script exposure and phonological awareness develops in line with the orthographic depth hypothesis (Frost, Katz, & Bentin, 1987). The Bahasa Indonesia group exhibited the highest levels of alphabetic phonological awareness, followed by the English group and then the Chinese group. In Mandarin, the pupils' performance on the Hanyu Pinyin spelling test suggested that tonal phonological awareness is relatively independent of alphabetic phonological awareness. It seems that language background can influence the nature and development of phonological awareness, and that this in turn may affect children's strategies for the subsequent acquisition of a second (or third) written language.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1998 , pp. 339 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barr, R. (1975). The effect of instruction on pupil reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 555–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentin, S., Hammer, R., & Cahan, S. (1991). The effects of aging and first grade schooling on thedevelopment of phonological awareness. Psychological Science, 2, 271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children anddyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 156–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caravolas, M., & Bruck, M. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children'sphonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cataldo, S., & Ellis, N. C. (1988). Interactions in the development of spelling, reading and phonological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 86–109.Google Scholar
Chandler Yeo, H., Rickard Liow, S. J., & Gupta, A. F. (1994). Specific language disorders inSingaporean children: Four case studies. Singapore Journal of Education, 14, 1–10.Google Scholar
Chen, M. J., & Yuen, J. C. K. (1991). Effects of Pinyin and script type on verbal processing:Comparisons of China, Taiwan and Hong Kong experience. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 14, 429–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Statistics. (1992). Census of population 1990: Demographic characteristics. Singapore: Singapore National Publishers.Google Scholar
Ellis, N., & Cataldo, S. (1992). Spelling is integral to learning to read. In Sterling, C. M.Robson, & C. (Eds.), Psychology, spelling and education (pp. 122–142). Clevedon: MultilingualMatters.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1980). Spelling difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disci-plines, 19, 279–285.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In Patterson, K., Marshall, J., & Col-theart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London Frith U.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographicdepth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptionand Performance, 13, 104–115.Google ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. E. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integratingthe teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. ChildDevelopment, 65, 41–57.Google Scholar
Ho, L.-K. P. (1992). Phonological awareness in English-Chinese bilingual children. Unpublishedmanuscript. Department of Social Work and Psychology, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1996). The effect of first written language on the acquisition of Englishliteracy. Cognition, 59, 119–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processingin Aphasics (PALPA). Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (1989). Effects of LI orthographic representation on L2 phonological coding strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (1994). Second language reading research: Problems and possibilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15 (1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Li, N. C, & Thompson, S. A. (1987). Chinese. In Comrie, B. (Ed.), The world's major languages. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C., & Fischer, F. W. (1977). Phoneticsegmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Loo, S. C. (1989). Frequency dictionary of Chinese characters, words, and phrases used in Singapore primary school textbooks. Singapore: Chinese Language and Research Centre, NationalUniversity of Singapore.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1986). Phonological awareness: The role of reading experience. Cognition, 24, 65–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Education. (1981). Chinese language syllabus for the new education system. Singapore:Educational Publications Bureau.Google Scholar
Naidoo, S. (1981). Teaching methods and their rationale in dyslexic research and its applications toeducation. In Pavlidis, G. T.&, T. R. Miles (Eds.), Dyslexia research and its applications toeducation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pakir, A. (1993). Two tongue tied: Bilingualism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 14, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C, & Coltheart, M. (1985). Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological andcognitive studies of phonological reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. J. (1987). Malay (Indonesian and Malaysian). In Comrie, B. (Ed.), The world's majorlanguages. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Read, G., Zhang, Y., Nie, H., & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds dependson knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard Liow, S. J., & Tng, S. K. (1992). English reading and spelling test battery: Word familiarity, word consistency and nonword. (Working Paper No. 46). Singapore: Department of SocialWork and Psychology, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (1976). Foundations for teaching English as a second language: Theory andmethod for multicultural education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K. (1990). Developmental dyslexia. In Eysenck, M. W. (Ed.), Cognitive psychology:An international review. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K. (1992). Cognitive theories of spelling and implications for education. In Sterling, C. M.Robson, & C. (Eds.), Psychology, spelling, and education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., & Evans, H. M. (1994). Levels of phonological awareness and learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 221–250.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning-disabled children: evaluating the assumption of specificity. In Torgesen, J. & Wong, B. (Eds.), Psychologicaland educational perspectives on learning disabilities. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Sterling, C. M. (1992). Introduction to the psychology of spelling. In Sterling, C. M. & Robson, C. (Eds.), Psychology, spelling, and education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wang, W. S.-Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 50–63.Google Scholar
Watson, I. (1991). Phonological processing in two languages. In Bialystok, E. (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar