Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:37:58.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The on-line processing of unaccusativity in Greek agrammatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2011

ELENI PERISTERI ,
IANTHI-MARIA TSIMPLI  and
KYRANA TSAPKINI
ELENI PERISTERI*
Affiliation:
Aristotle University of Thesaloniki
IANTHI-MARIA TSIMPLI
Affiliation:
Aristotle University of Thesaloniki
KYRANA TSAPKINI
Affiliation:
John Hopkins University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Eleni Peristeri, Aristotle University of Thesaloniki, School of English, Ethnikis Aminis, P. C. 54 124, Office 308A, Thessaloniki, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the on-line processing of unaccusative and unergative sentences in a group of eight Greek-speaking individuals diagnosed with Broca aphasia and a group of language-unimpaired subjects used as the baseline. The processing of unaccusativity refers to the reactivation of the postverbal trace by retrieving the mnemonic representation of the verb's syntactically defined antecedent provided in the early part of the sentence. Our results demonstrate that the Broca group showed selective reactivation of the antecedent for the unaccusatives. We consider several interpretations for our data, including explanations focusing on the transitivization properties of nonactive and active voice-alternating unaccusatives, the costly procedure claimed to underlie the parsing of active nonvoice-alternating unaccusatives, and the animacy of the antecedent modulating the syntactic choices of the patients.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 233 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (2004). Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative alternation: Evidence for a non-unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Everaert, M. (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaguer, R. D., Costa, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Juncadella, M., & Caramazza, A. (2004). Regular and irregular morphology and its relationship with agrammatism: Evidence from two Spanish–Catalan bilinguals. Brain and Language, 91, 212–222.Google Scholar
Balogh, J., Zurif, E. B., Prather, P., Swinney, D., & Finkel, L. (1998). Gap filling and end of sentence effects in real-time language processing: Implications for modeling sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, H., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., & Patterson, K. (2003). Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What's the connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 502–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E., Byma, G., Kurowski, K., Hourihan, J., Brown, T., & Hutchison, A. (1998). On-line processing of filler-gap constructions in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkhardt, P., Piñango, M., & Wong, K. (2003). The Role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity. Brain and Language, 86, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burkhardt, P., Avrutin, S., Piñango, M. M., & Ruigendijk, E. (2008). Slower-than-normal syntactic processing in agrammatic Broca aphasia: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1996). Syntactic processing in sentence comprehension under dual-task conditions in aphasic patients. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 525–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, F., Bock, K., & Goldberg, A. (2003). Do thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition, 90, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2004). The resolution and recovery of filler-gap dependencies in aphasia: Evidence from on-line anomaly detection. Brain and Language, 88, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M. I., Emmorey, K., & Bellugi, U. (1992). Sensitivity to inflectional morphology in aphasia: A real-time processing perspective. Brain and Language, 43, 747–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, N., Taranto, G., Shapiro, L. P., & Swinney, D. (2008). The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 39, 355–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froud, K. (2001). Linguistic theory and language pathology: Evidence for the morphology interface from a case of acquired language disorder. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language disorders. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). Trace deletion, θ-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 50, 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grodzinsky, Y., Piñango, M., Zurif, E., & Drai, D. (1999). The critical role of group studies in neuropsychology: Comprehension regularities in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1991). Syntactic priming in Broca's aphasics: Evidence for slow activation. Aphasiology, 5, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, H. (1993). Comprehension of passive in Japanese aphasics. Brain and Language, 45, 247–263.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. (1997). Semantic priming in Broca's aphasics at shortV SOA: No support for an automatic semantic access deficit. Brain and Language, 56, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of grammatical relations. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (Ed.), Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. The view from building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linebarger, M., Schwarz, M., & Saffran, E. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structures in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 11, 361–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport-Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity: At the syntax–lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, T., Swinney, D., Walenski, M., & Zurif, E. (2008). How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 107, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Love, T., Swinney, D., & Zurif, E. (2001). Aphasia and the time-course of processing long distance dependencies. Brain and Language, 79, 169–170.Google Scholar
Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., Contardi, A., & Pinna, G. D. (2002). Verb–noun double dissociations in aphasic lexical impairments: The role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and Language, 81, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzini, M. R., & Roussou, A. (2000). A minimalist theory of A-movement and control. Lingua, 110, 409–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature, 387, 592–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R. (2003). Language processing: Functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 55–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Sentential context and on-line lexical decision tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Lanquage, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1239–1243.Google Scholar
Miceli, G., & Caramazza, A. (1988). Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology. Brain and Language, 35, 24–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatics' difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milberg, W. P., Blumstein, S. E., & Dworetzky, B. (1987). Processing of lexical ambiguities in aphasia. Brain and Language, 31, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, L., Holland, A., & Beeson, P. M. (1997). Accuracy monitoring and task demand evaluation in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, H. N., Shapiro, L. P., & Nawy, R. (1994) Prosody and the processing of filler-gap sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 473–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nanousi, V., Masterson, J., Druks, J., & Atkinson, M. (2006). Interpretable vs. uninterpretable features: Evidence from six Greek speaking agrammatic patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 209–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9, 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappert, S., Zeiske, M., & Pechmann, T. (2009). Structural priming across verb types and voice. Oral presentation at the 22nd annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1987). The assessment of bilingual aphasia. Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Penke, M., Janssen, U., & Krause, M (1999). The representation of inflectional morphology: Evidence from Broca aphasia. Brain and Language, 68, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peristeri, E. (2005). Agrammatism in modern Greek: Aspects of production and comprehension. In Agathopoulou, E., Dimitrakopoulou, M., & Papadopoulou, D. (Eds.), 17th International Symposium: Selected papers on theoretical and applied linguistics (Vol. 2). Thessaloniki: Monohromia.Google Scholar
Peristeri, E., & Tsapkini, K. (2011). A comparison of the BAT and BDAE-SF batteries in determining the linguistic ability in Greek-speaking patients with Broca aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 25, 464–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1978). Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Jaeger, J. J., Woodbury, A. E., Ackerman, F., Chiarello, C., Gensler, O. D., Kingston, J., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Rogalsky, C., Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2008). Broca's area, sentence comprehension, and working memory: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roussou, A., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2007). The role of cliticization in Modern Greek. In Alexiadou, A. (Ed.), Studies in the morpho-syntax of Greek. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Linebarger, M. C. (1998). Semantic influences on thematic role assignment: Evidence from normals and aphasics. Brain and Language, 62, 255–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C., Saffran, E. M., & Pate, D. (1987). Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. P., Gordon, B., Hack, N., & Killakey, J. (1993). Verb-argument structure processing in complex sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 423–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, L., Nagel, N., & Levine, B. (1993). Preferences for a verb's complements and their use in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 96–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition, 27, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, L., Zurif, E. B., & Grimshaw, J. (1989). Verb processing during sentence comprehension: Contextual impenetrability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re) consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, D., Ford, M., Frauenfelder, U., & Bresnan, J. (1987). The time course of coindexation during sentence comprehension. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society Meeting, Seattle.Google Scholar
Swinney, D., Zurif, E. B., Prather, P., & Love, T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing resources underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, D. (2000). -O/-me alternations in MG patient oriented constructions: Anticausatives and passives. In Pavlidou, T. & Tzitzilis, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Department of the University of Thessaloniki. Thessaloniki: University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, D. (2001). The structure of VP and the mediopassive morphology: The passives and anticausatives in Modern Greek. Oral presentation at the Workshop on Greek Syntax and the Minimalist Seduction, Reading University.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. K. (2003). Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, C. K., & Choy, J. J. (2009). Pronominal resolution and gap filling in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38, 255–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsapkini, K., Emmanuel, A., Passalidou, C., & Nassiopoulou, G. (2007). Boston diagnostic Aphasia examination-short form: Greek normative data. Poster presented at the 9th European Conference on Psychological Assessment (ECPA9), Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Tsapkini, K., Jarema, G. & Kehaya, E. (2002). Regularity revisited: Evidence from lexical access of verbs and nouns in Greek. Brain and Language, 81, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseng, H., McNeil, M. R., & Milenkovic, P. (1993). An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 276–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsimpli, I.-M. (2006). The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as a native and second language. In Unshworth, S., Parodi, T., Sorace, A., & Young–Scholten, M. (Eds.), Paths of development in L1 and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., et al. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varlokosta, S., Valeonti, N., Kakavoulia, M., Lazaridou, M., Economou, A., & Protopapas, A. (2006). The breakdown of functional categories in Greek aphasia: evidence from agreement, tense, and aspect. Aphasiology, 20, 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., Caplan, D. (2004). Verbal working memory and on-line syntactic processing: Evidence from self-paced listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 129–163.Google ScholarPubMed
Zingeser, L. B., & Bemdt, R. S. (1990). Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language, 39, 14–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed