Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:29:35.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Object label learning by middle- and working-class, black and white, younger and older preschool children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

Valerie Whittlesey  and
Elizabeth F. Shipley
Valerie Whittlesey*
Affiliation:
Kennesaw State University
Elizabeth F. Shipley
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
*
Valerie Whittlesey Lawrence, Department of Psychology, Kennesaw State University, 1000 Chastain Road, Kennesaw, GA 30144
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examined the ability of younger and older preschool children from different backgrounds (16 middle-class black, 16 middle-class white, 16 working-class black, and 16 working-class white) to map labels to objects and to establish inclusion relationships. The children were taught novel labels for perceptually related and unrelated unfamiliar objects. Although the groups were similar in their ability to comprehend the first label during the first session, white children produced the first label more. When additional labels were taught during subsequent sessions, the differences among the groups of children were augmented. Although children from all backgrounds applied labels to objects based on initial labelings, middle-class, white, and older children did this to a greater extent than working-class, black, and younger children. Evidence for the use of inclusion relations for perceptually related target objects was not found for the children; rather, the children used a mutually exclusive labeling strategy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 429 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasiow, N., Hanes, M., & Hanes, M. (1982). Language and reading strategies for poverty children (pp. 75-105). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Anglin, J. (1977). Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Au, T., & Glusman, M. (1990). The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: To honor or not to honor? Child Development, 61, 1474-1490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blewitt, P. (1994). Understanding of categorical hierarchies: The earlier levels of skill. Child Development, 65, 1279-1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., Caldwell, B., & Rock, S. (1988). Home environment and school performance: Tenyear follow-up examination of three models of environmental action. Child Development, 59, 852-867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. (1978). The child as word learner. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J., & Miller, G. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 264-293). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chall, J. (1987). Two vocabularies for reading: Recognition and meaning. In McKeown, M. G. & Curtis, M. E. (Eds.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 7-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chase-Lansdale, F., Mott, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Phillips, D. (1991). Children of the national longitudinal survey of youth: A unique research opportunity. Developmental Psychology, 27, 918- 931.Google Scholar
Clark, E. (1983). Meanings and concepts. In Flavell, J. & Markman, E. (Eds.), Cognitive development: Vol. 3. Manual of child psychology (4th ed., pp. 787-840). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
DeStefano, J. (1978). Language: The learner and the school. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D., & Tabors, P. (1991, April). Early literacy: Linkages between home, school, and literacy achievement at age 5. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association meeting, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Golinkoff, R., Mervis, C., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1994). Early object labels: The case of a developmental lexical principles framework. Journal of Child Language, 21, 125-155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golinkoff, R., Shuff-Bailey, M., Olguin, R., & Ruan, W. (1995). Young children extend novel words at the basic level: Evidence for the principle of categorical scope. Developmental Psychology, 31, 494-507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, A. (Ed.). (1984). Home environment and early cognitive development. Longitudinal research. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaning differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1991). Mother-child conversation in different social classes and communicative settings. Child Development, 62, 782-796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1992). How should frequency in input be measured? First Language, 12, 233-245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1994). Influences of mother and child on maternal talkativeness. Discourse Processes, 18, 105-117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1995). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In Bornstein, M. (Ed.). Handbook of parenting (pp. 161-188). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Landau, B., & Stecker, D. (1990). Objects and places: Geometric and syntactic representations in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 5, 287-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, V. (1997). Middle and working-class children's speech during a picture labeling task. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 158, 226-240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, V., & Shipley, E. (1996). Parental speech to middle- and working-class children from two racial groups in three settings. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 233-255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liittschwager, J., & Markman, E. (1994). Sixteen- and 24-month-olds’ use of mutual exclusivity as a default assumption in second-label learning. Developmental Psychology, 6, 955-968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E., & Hutchinson, J. (1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, E., & Wachtel, G. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121-157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervis, C., Golinkoff, R., & Bertrand, J. (1994). Two-year-olds readily learn multiple labels for the same basic-level category. Child Development, 65, 1163-1177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neisser, U. (Ed.). (1986). The school achievement of minority children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. (1980). Ostensive definition in vocabulary teaching. Journal of Child Language, 7, 565-573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ninio, A. (1990). Early environmental experiences and school achievement in the second grade: An Israeli study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13, 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quay, L., & Blaney, R. (1992). Verbal communication, nonverbal communication, and private speech in lower and middle socioeconomic status preschool children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 153, 129-138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 382-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. (1983). Literacy and language: Relationships during the preschool years. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 165-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wales, R., Colman, M., & Pattison, P. (1983). How a thing is called - A study of mothers’ and children's naming. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 1-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D., Greenwood, C., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65, 606-621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, S., & Gelman, R. (1986). Preschoolers’ use of superordinate relations in classification and language. Cognitive Development, 1, 139-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waxman, S., & Hatch, T. (1992). Beyond the basics: Preschool children label objects flexibly at multiple hierarchical levels. Journal of Child Language, 19, 153-166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, S., & Kosowski, T. (1990). Nouns mark category relations: Toddlers’ and preschoolers’ word-learning biases. Child Development, 61, 1461-1473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waxman, S., & Senghas, A. (1992). Relations among word meanings in early lexical development. Developmental Psychology, 28, 862-873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Download undefined(PDF)
PDF 80.1 KB