Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:30:19.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological awareness and reading achievement in university students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Jamie L. Metsala ,
Rauno Parrila ,
Nicole J. Conrad  and
S. Hélène Deacon Open the ORCID record for S. Hélène Deacon [Opens in a new window]
Jamie L. Metsala*
Affiliation:
Mount Saint Vincent University
Rauno Parrila
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Nicole J. Conrad
Affiliation:
Saint Mary’s University
S. Hélène Deacon
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University Life Sciences Centre
*
*Corresponding author. Email: Jamie. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examined morphological awareness and reading achievement in university students in two ways. First, students with and without a self-reported history of reading difficulties were compared on word reading and text reading achievement, and on the reading-related skills of morphological awareness, orthographic processing, and phonological processing. Second, the unique contribution of morphological awareness to reading achievement was examined for a larger sample of first-year university students. Students with a self-reported history of reading difficulties (n = 54) showed moderate to large gaps in each area of reading achievement, and timed reading comprehension appeared more severely impaired than word-reading efficiency. These students had a deficit in morphological awareness that persisted even when (a) phonological awareness and orthographic processing skills, or (b) word-reading accuracy were statistically controlled. In the larger first-year sample (N = 211), morphological awareness contributed to variance in word reading beyond that accounted for by phonological awareness and orthographic processing. Furthermore, of the reading-related skills, only morphological awareness made a unique contribution to reading comprehension beyond variance accounted for by word reading. Taken together, these results demonstrate that morphological awareness makes unique contributions to university students’ reading achievement and is an additional difficulty for students with a self-reported history of reading difficulties.

Keywords

morphological awarenessreading achievementreading disabilitiesuniversity students
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 743 - 763
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Kochva, I. (2016). An examination of an intervention program designed to enhance reading and spelling through the training of morphological decomposition in word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 163–172. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1108321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergey, B., Deacon, S., & Parrila, R. (2017). Metacognitive reading and study strategies and academic achievement of university students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 81–94. doi: 10.1177/0022219415597020 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. I., Fishco, V. V., & Hanna, G. (1993). The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition and component phonological processing skills of adults with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Developmental Review, 13, 258–268. doi: 10.1006/drev.1993.1012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M., Guasti, M., Sabisch, B., & Männel, C. (2013). Characterizing the morphosyntactic processing deficit and its relationship to phonology in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1595–1607. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.04.009 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400007839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, K. B., Bock, A. M., Coppage, E. A., Hodgkiss, M. D., & Nelson, M. I. (2017). A comparison of cognitive flexibility and metalinguistic skills in adult good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 139–152. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalli, E., Colé, P., Pattamadilok, C., Badier, J. M., Zielinski, C., Chanoine, V., & Ziegler, J. C. (2017). Spatiotemporal reorganization of the reading network in adult dyslexia. Cortex, 92, 204–221. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.012 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalli, E., Duncan, L., Elbro, G., El Ahmadi, C., & Colé, A. (2017). Phonemic—Morphemic dissociation in university students with dyslexia: An index of reading compensation? Annals of Dyslexia, 67, 63–84. doi: 10.1007/s11881-016-0138-y CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chevalier, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K. C., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). The role of metacognitive reading strategies, metacognitive study and learning strategies, and behavioral study and learning strategies in predicting academic success in students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 34–48. doi: 10.1177/0022219415588850 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, C., Gregg, N., McLain, L., & Bellair, L. W. (2009). A comparison of spelling performance across young adults with and without dyslexia. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 94–105. doi: 10.1177/1534508408318808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, N. J., Harris, N., & Williams, J. (2013). Individual differences in children’s literacy development: The contribution of orthographic knowledge. Reading and Writing, 26, 1223–1239. doi: 10.1007/s1114501294152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkett, J. K., & Parrila, R. (2008). Use of context in the word recognition process by adults with a significant history of reading difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 139–161. doi: 10.1007/s11881-008-0018-1 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corkett, J. K., Parrila, R., & Hein, S. F. (2006). Learning and study strategies of university students who report a significant history of reading difficulties. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 34, 57–79.Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). “Fell” primes “fall,” but does “bell” prime “ball”? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A., Nathan, R., & Raher, K. (2011). Orthographic processing in models of word recognition. In Kamil, M., Pearson, P., Moje, E., and Afflerbach, P. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H. (2012). Sounds, letters and meanings: The independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 456–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01496.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Pasquarella, A. (2013). Reciprocal relationship: Children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1113–1126. doi: 10.1037/a0029474 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H., Cook, K., & Parrila, R. (2012). Identifying high-functioning dyslexics: Is self-report of early reading problems enough? Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 120–134. doi: 10.1007/s11881-012-0068-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 432–451. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.926907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. doi: 10.1017/S0142716404001110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–128. doi: 10.1007/s11881-006-0005-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S. H., Tong, X., & Mimeau, C. (2016). Morphological and semantic processing in developmental dyslexia across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. In Perfetti, C., and Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Dyslexia across languages and writing systems: A handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240. doi: 10.1007/BF02648177 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. doi: 10.1177/074193258600700104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 159–183. doi: 10.1177/1086296X11403086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatcher, J., Snowling, M., & Griffiths, Y. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 119–133. doi: 10.1348/000709902158801 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hebert, M. (2016). An examination of reading comprehension and reading rate in university students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Canada).Google Scholar
Jackson, N. E. (2005). Are university students’ component reading skills related to their text comprehension and academic achievement? Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 113–139. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, N. E., & Doellinger, H. (2002). Resilient readers? University students who are poor recoders but sometimes good text comprehenders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 64–78. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, N., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. (2009). Phonological and orthographic spelling in high-functioning adult dyslexics. Dyslexia, 15, 105–128. doi: 10.1002/dys.364 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25, 389–410. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, A. (2008). Overlapping confidence intervals and statistical significance. StatNews: Cornell University Statistical Consulting Unit, 73. Retrieved from http://www.cscu.cornell.edu/news/statnews/stnews73.pdf.Google Scholar
Kruk, R. S., & Bergman, K. (2013). The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 10–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, L. J., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. M., Wouters, J., & Ghesquière, P. (2015). Morphological awareness and its role in compensation in adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 21, 254–272. doi: 10.1002/dys.1495 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefly, D. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the adult reading history questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 286–296. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300306 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leikin, M., & Zur Hagit, E. (2006). Morphological processing in adult dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 471–490. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9025-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leinonen, S., Müller, K., Leppänen, P., Aro, H., Ahonen, M., & Lyytinen, T. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing, 14, 265–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1011117620895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, J., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Cole, P. (2014). Morphological awareness in dyslexic university students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 1213–1233. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyler, A., & Breznitz, Z. (2005). Impaired phonological and orthographic word representations among adult dyslexic readers: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 215–240. doi: 10.3200/GNTP.166.2.215-240 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller-Shaul, S. (2005). The characteristics of young and adult dyslexics readers on reading and reading related cognitive tasks as compared to normal readers. Dyslexia, 11, 132–151. doi: 10.1002/dys.290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. E. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E, and Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Parrila, R., Corkett, J., Kirby, J., & Hein, S. (2003). Adult Reading History Questionnaire—Revised (Unpublished questionnaire, University of Alberta).Google Scholar
Parrila, R., Georgiou, G., & Corkett, J. (2007). University students with a significant history of reading difficulties: What is and is not compensated? Exceptionality Education Canada, 17, 195–220. doi: 10.1037/t52486-00 Google Scholar
Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.827687 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2015). Visual processing of derivational morphology in children with developmental dyslexia: Insights from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 345–376. doi: 10.1017/S014271641300026X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, J., & Deacon, H. (2008). The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 35, 453–465. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008525 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarborough, H. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In Neuman, S. B., and Dickinson, D. K. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129. doi: 10.1002/dys.322 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 31–82. doi: o10.1016/ S0065-2407(08)00002-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, F., & Singleton, C. (2000). The reading comprehension abilities of dyslexic students in higher education. Dyslexia, 6, 178–192. doi: 10.1002/1099-0909(200007/09 3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C., & Strucker, J. (2000). Lessons from preventing reading difficulties in young children for adult learning and literacy. In Comings, J., Garner, B., and Smith, C. (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy: A project of the National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 25–73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Stafura, J., & Perfetti, C. (2017). Integrating word processing with text comprehension: Theoretical frameworks and empirical examples. In Cain, K., Compton, D. L., and Parrila, R. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (Vol. 15, pp. 9–32). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, 44, 351–376. doi:10.1177/00238309010440030301 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523. doi: 10.1037/a0023495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1998). Phonological processing and reading: Contributions from longitudinal research. Thalamus, 16, 30–39.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Welcome, S. E., Chiarello, C., Halderman, L. K., & Leonard, C. M. (2009). Lexical processing skill in college-age resilient readers. Reading and Writing, 22, 353–371. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9120-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: CELF-5. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests—Revised [kit]: Normative update. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar